Bitcoin Forum
April 25, 2024, 03:55:41 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 ... 200 »
261  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Any bitcoin-turned-millionaires here? on: March 21, 2015, 06:53:43 AM
As the title says, just interested, are there people on the forums who became millionaires due to BTC alone?

Most active accounts that have been around and active since 2010 and 2011 probably have made a million or two from Bitcoin.
262  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [XMR] Monero - A secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency - 0.8.8.6 on: March 21, 2015, 06:48:38 AM
It seems like the rise of the past few weeks has run out of steam, I wonder if we'll slowly bottom out ready for another rise in a month or two?
263  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][DRK] Darkcoin | First Anonymous Coin | Inventor of X11, DGW, Darksend and InstantX on: March 21, 2015, 06:47:24 AM
Is there a reason for the current growth in price?
264  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: rpietila Altcoin Observer on: March 16, 2015, 12:09:34 PM

Sounds like SuperNET to me. Especially the API thing and being able to run on any type of currency.

I'm not so sure, isn't SuperNET using the various coins as features apart of the network? For example BBR will be the anonymous layer, etc...

I am not advocating that at all, I'm advocating for a truly coin agnostic platform that only uses Crypto Currencies as a method of barter/payment and nothing more.
265  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: rpietila Altcoin Observer on: March 15, 2015, 02:57:15 PM
@rpietila -- i agree with you on your initial post back last year about the altcoins you listed. I was also in the same boat with the nxt premine distribution, but  having following it for the past year it seems that their platform is more promising than its coin aside from the premine aspect. I'm curious to what is your thoughts on it so far with its latest developments.

I haven't really followed the "blockchain 2.0" things including NXT or payment networks (Ripple, Paypal). I also don't know about technology and it does not interest me. I haven't invested in any of the aforementioned and don't think I will.

Although XMR is down from where I told that it is "very interesting", I have followed it closely and been actively involved in the development. I feel there is a great undervaluation ongoing, and the rise that started a few weeks ago is just the beginning. XMR needs to make a new high ($5+) to make it a convincing case for an altcoin that has future. We still have about 600% to go to reach even that value, which means there's money to be made.

Money I do understand, technology not.

I think I said this a while ago, at one point (way before Monero) I was very optimistic about generation 2 coins, coins that could run applications and such.
After following the developments of MaidSafe, Ripple, Ethereum for a while the idea turned a little sour in my mind, and this was still before Monero was on the scene.

The reason for sour flour? Imagine the internet was bound so that each TCP transaction was tied eternally into dollars?
Yep, it all kind of fell apart from that point onwards, in my mind.

I felt that the solution wasn't in tying a currency into such a platform, the solution was a generation 2 platform that would be coin agnostic.
The ideal platform would be more open and fluid, accepting any number of currencies to run it's underlying system, some of these apps might not even need to be tied into crypto currency at all.

One of my beliefs is that over a long enough time span, almost all systems will become open. I believe the same will happen for these platforms. Ethereum might be open source, but it's still a closed eco system for the applications running on top. The fuel is a single coin that can never change.

Once I convinced myself that the true generation 2 platforms would eventually run on top of any currency (using perhaps some type of API?) I started looking for a new coin, one that can compliment my Bitcoin investments. I found Zerocoin and waited for it, but as more information came out, about the trust issues with the initial accumulator state, I moved on from that idea.

I waited and waited and then Monero came along. A fresh idea, a coin that wasn't tacking on Gen 2 crap, closed eco systems, and a coin that offered anonymity now with a growing development team.

So I started investing with my fingers crossed.

It was a while after that you announced that you too were interested in Monero, and having knew who you were beforehand really helped back up my decision.

Perhaps Monero will be my saving grace, that future platforms will run on top of it and others, with Monero leading the way as the true cash of the internet.

Who knows.

Separate church and state.
Separate coin and platform.

:p
266  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [XMR] Monero - A secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency - 0.8.8.6 on: March 10, 2015, 07:56:04 AM
Any reason for the price increase?

rats fleeing a slinking ship?

Wait. Wouldn't that cause the price to crash?
267  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [XMR] Monero - A secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency - 0.8.8.6 on: March 10, 2015, 03:46:38 AM
Any reason for the price increase?
268  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Service Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: Just-Dice.com : Invest in 1% House Edge Dice Game on: March 02, 2015, 03:37:53 PM
Dooglus, why did you choose CLAM's?

I'm not dooglus but I believe CLAMs were seen as being closer to "play money". The reason why Just-Dice stopped using Bitcoin was because of new regulations in Canada and also because he felt uncomfortable handling such large amounts of other peoples' money.

Also this post sheds some insight into why he chose CLAMs:

...

Thanks Bizmark13.

I wonder if Dooglus will ever sell the site code or release the entire betting database from the bitcoin site?
I would love to have a torrent of every roll. So much history there.

269  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Service Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: Just-Dice.com : Invest in 1% House Edge Dice Game on: March 02, 2015, 01:32:17 PM
Dooglus, why did you choose CLAM's?
270  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [XMR] Monero - A secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency - 0.8.8.6 on: March 02, 2015, 01:24:56 PM
Don't know if someone already find it, but it seems to me that this thread

ring signature efficiency
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=972541.msg10619684#msg10619684

is worth sharing here.

To make a long story short Adam Back is speculating on how reducing ring signature used in cryptonote:

This alternate linkable ring signature tends to 1/2 the size of the crypto note ring signature as the signature is 3+n values vs 2+2n values.

I haven't the skill to validate his claims but I thought than monero devs would be interested in such a claim.

What are the implications of this? Could we use this research to make Monero more efficient?
271  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: The network seems stressed (and behind) right now on: March 01, 2015, 05:33:22 PM
Is this really news? I recall several thousand tx being in the queue as the norm for Bitcoin.
In addition, all my transactions with the proper fee have been accepted as per normal.

I think if we start to see 10,000 unconfirmed fee paying tx then we might need to raise the alarm.

Like someone's earlier calculations in this thread suggest, the average fee of the unconfirmed tx in queue is really low.
272  Economy / Economics / Re: Was Bitcoin actually just a Pump and Dump? on: March 01, 2015, 05:26:19 PM
What charts say currency (all currency) is a pump and dump?  I would love to see them and see why you think that.

If it was sure it was a pump and dump, the price would be zero or close to zero.

We could be the small group of believers, holding up its price. Smiley

could be. but the people who hold now can also be the new wealthy elite.
you never know. that's why we hold.

I'm not sure about this...

I think that most people are holding because they have already incurred massive losses and are waiting patiently until the price rises to a break even point.
It's at that point most holders will sell, stop stressing and move on with their lives.

The side effect here is that, we have hundreds of thousands of people with their sell price, and until the market absorbs this, it will not continue to new highs.

Unfortunately, I think that this is creating far too much downward pressure that will simply ruin Bitcoin.

Cryptocurrency will probably prevail, but I am not sure that it will be Bitcoin leading the way.
The coin that will lead the way simply doesn't exist yet.
273  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] Official Shareholder Discussion Thread [Moderated] on: March 01, 2015, 05:00:08 PM
zumzero...loses 10k pounds, supports the one that stole his money and comes here to post retard shit. Only in Bitcoin land.

No-one stole my money.  I invested in a high risk, high reward tech startup which did not succeed.  I did not invest more than I could afford to lose and I sleep well at night because of that.  I continue to invest in this space and am confident the future is peaches and cream all the way.

Negative.

Ken constantly lied to us. For months he made no progress whilst lying to us.

I'm in the process of starting up a startup and if it fails that is ok, on certain conditions!
One of these conditions is that we do the best for the company we start and we do the best we can with the money invested.

That means that we tell the truth even if it's ugly. If folding the company and returning x% of the money is the best option because our idea failed, then so be it.

We can pivot if we know what we are doing and our investors agree with the information we provide.
Once you lie to your investors you are a scammer.

This is the crucial difference that you're not really understanding very well.

Ken's idea failed, and instead of admitting defeat he somehow lost the rest of the money whilst doing nothing for months on end, whilst lying to us.
In fact, I recall that Ken said that we were still with eASIC for a long time when that business partnership had ended long ago.

Ken deceived us and was rarely honest.

This wasn't another startup that failed, it was a web of lies.
If you lie to your investors you become a scammer.

It's actually quite simple and I am concerned you cannot understand this basic logic.
274  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Best Alternative Altcoin ? on: February 26, 2015, 02:12:36 PM
Try to research the technology yourself. Or simply put whats under the hood of these coins

Don't have enough knowledge to judge by my self again . btw does the creators of both Litecoin & Dogecoin are from Bitcointalk forums ? I mean how they first started since they are the most famous after Bitcoin .

~ Madness

If you don't have enough knowledge, then spend some time to learn and gain the knowledge.
Trust me, Bitcoin and the Alts are the easiest way to lose vast sums of money if you're not careful.

Educate yourself first and purchase coins second.

275  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [XMR] Monero - A secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency - 0.8.8.6 on: February 24, 2015, 01:00:42 PM
Any reason for the price increase today?
276  Bitcoin / Mining support / Re: probability of generating a block solo mining Bitcoin vs lottery on: January 27, 2015, 01:23:33 PM
had to un-shit my pants - realized posts originally from 2013. because someone asked how long would it take, someone pointed 1ths or so, and had a block in no time. i was... excited and confused.

someone recently lucked one with nominal hashing considering the task. just luck.

there's a difference between hashing and catching.
Lottery sells hope, solo mining sells loss. There is no way around using a pool now, then the luck turns the other way: tiny revenue in comparison to ruffled looking raffle tickets.

Isn't mining only for companies that can construct ASIC's now, and even then most of them fail.
277  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Speculation (Altcoins) / Re: [XMR] Monero Speculation on: January 27, 2015, 05:51:36 AM
Not many predicted that we would reach $1242 per bitcoin in 2013, when it started the year at $13.50, unable to surpass the previous peak for 18 months.

The peak was surpassed, and 30 months after (the peak of 2011), Bitcoin was trading 40x higher.

I think this makes it more, not less, probable that the same can happen again and $50k reached if not this, the next year.


BTW. I was one of the (quite few) people to recognize that BTC's NPV was $2000 when it was trading at about $50 in March-13. This realization helped me a lot in the assurance of going speculatively all-in that year, and realizing a 600% gain in 7 months.

It is true that the prediction of $300k per bitcoin before the end of 2013 did not materialize, yet everyone who played along, did fantastically good by buying at $50. They either sold partly with me for 1000%+ gain, or are still holding for a 500% unrealized gain.

Every troll who does not have money to pay his own expenses would do well to heed this.





What are your price predictions for Monero for the next 6 months?

It has been very disheartening to see it fall so low.
278  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: The Best Coin To Purchase For a 1+ year hold? on: January 21, 2015, 05:55:41 AM
I'm surprised no one mentioned Monero.
Has the community fallen out of favour with this one?
279  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] Official Shareholder Discussion Thread [Moderated] on: January 17, 2015, 06:10:51 PM
I was probably the most vocal supporter of Ken's dream and that's because I trully belived in it myself.  But even my generally optomistic self can accept I backed the wrong horse in this instance.  Financially it hurt me a lot but I'd never want to share with the majority of twisted people who frequent this forum, just how badly.  And yet, with all that has happened I still maintain that Ken tried his best and genuinely wanted to to make his shareholders successful.  He failed on that and I'm sure it will have a more profound effect on him as a human being than many of you would care to accept or acknowledge.  Some of the hate that exists in this space is perhaps the worst I have ever witnessed in humanity and even with that I still hold hope for all, as irrespective of the sides we've chosen, perhaps we might agree that it is long overdue that the common person becomes empowered to change the world for the betterment of their species using bitcoin and similar decentralised solutions.  All is fair in love and war.  Best of luck to you all.

Ken should have returned all the investors money the moment the eASIC deal fell through.
Ken did not know what he was talking about, he constantly got basic Bitcoin terminology confused and lied to us about the progress he was making.

If he had said after eASIC, sorry guys, I screwed up, here is some of your money back. Then he could have been forgiven. Bad business.

The fact is, he screwed up and just kept on going with it.

If he had given us back even 30% of our investment before the price spike, many of us would have been in profit.

I may not be remembering correctly, but we found out that the eASIC deal died before the price increase. I could be wrong.
280  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [XMR] Monero - A secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency - 0.8.8.6 on: January 17, 2015, 06:03:56 PM
I would have thought that Monero would appreciate against Bitcoin in times like these.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 ... 200 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!