Bitcoin Forum
May 20, 2019, 07:54:47 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.18.0 [Torrent] (New!)
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 ... 260 »
1  Economy / Speculation / Re: Legendary Bitcoin Trader “masterluc” Predicts $15,000 Bitcoin This Year on: December 07, 2017, 12:22:01 AM
Almost there  Grin
2  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Damaged wallet on: January 09, 2017, 05:00:03 PM
There is no sorting anymore in ledgers, since they are computed and paged in on the DB side. If the wallet side balance is fine, then this isn't a DB issue but a GUI one.

At this point you'll have to wait for 0.96, which has a lot of fixes on that front.

OK, thank you.
3  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: 2 year old Armory wallet. Do I have to sync the entire blockchain? on: January 09, 2017, 04:59:05 PM
^ I'm running 0.93.3.

0.95.1 won't start for me on OSX (not sure how to debug this, as I'm used to Linux), so I just got 0.93.3.

EDIT: With 0.95.1, if I do this

Code:
open /Applications/Armory.app

in a terminal, the Armory icon appears very briefly in the dock, then disappears, and nothing is printed to the console.

EDIT2: Found 0.95 on the GitHub repo's Releases page, and it works. It's scanning now...

Try this fix. (It'll be rolled into 0.96.) That should allow 0.95.1 to launch.

That fix worked for me. But you will need to remember move Armory.app to your Application folder for it to work.
4  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Damaged wallet on: January 07, 2017, 04:02:40 PM
If you tally the transactions visible in the ledger, what total amount do you end up with? If you double click on the wallet, is the balance off as well?

If I double click on the wallet the balance is OK.

I just discovered this: if I click on "Date", "Wallet", "Comments", or "Amount" on the transactions view the sorting of the transactions doesn't change but the balance updates to the correct amount. So I guess this bug is related to the wallet filter and the transactions view.
5  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Damaged wallet on: January 07, 2017, 03:32:58 PM
Log doesn't show anything off. Look at the wallet history, are there transactions missing?

No there aren't. I had a watching-only wallet with +20k transactions and I removed it just in case - the maximum availabe funds/spendable funds is still wrong. It says 0.0000000.
6  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Damaged wallet on: January 07, 2017, 02:09:13 AM
I finally managed to run 0.95.1 and now the transaction is displayed correctly when I double click on it but the wallet fiter is NOT working. Furthermore the maximum funds/spendable funds display is incorrect. Sad

Do you have enough addresses computed on the wallet chain? What is your top block? Let's see dbLog.txt.

Yes I have, for sure. dbLog.txt sent via private message.
7  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Damaged wallet on: January 06, 2017, 09:52:14 PM
I finally managed to run 0.95.1 and now the transaction is displayed correctly when I double click on it but the wallet fiter is NOT working. Furthermore the maximum funds/spendable funds display is incorrect. Sad

Perhaps you haven't defined ownership of all your wallets in Armory. For each wallet in Armory, go to "Wallet Properties/Belongs to:" and check "This wallet is mine" then click OK. Otherwise, available wallet funds will not be included in the total balance displayed on the main screen.



Yes I did - ownership was defined long ago, I've been using armory since a long time. Neverthless I re-assigned ownership just in case to no avail.
8  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Damaged wallet on: January 06, 2017, 09:28:23 PM
the wallet fiter is NOT working

That's a known bug. goatpig will hopefully have it squashed for 0.96.

Also the one about maximum spendable funds? It also seems its having problems to go online.
9  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Damaged wallet on: January 06, 2017, 09:06:23 PM
I finally managed to run 0.95.1 and now the transaction is displayed correctly when I double click on it but the wallet fiter is NOT working. Furthermore the maximum funds/spendable funds display is incorrect. Sad
10  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Damaged wallet on: January 06, 2017, 07:39:37 PM
I managed to start 0.95.1 but says "DB version mismatch"

Deleting database folder in /Application Support/Armory doesn't resolve the issue.

EDIT: just realized that an instance of armorydb kept running and i had to manually shut it off. Now I've deleted the db and its rebuilding. Will update later.
11  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Damaged wallet on: January 06, 2017, 07:33:04 PM
You're going to want to talk to goatpig and droark about this. I can't figure out why some things are breaking, sorry.

OK - in the meanwhile please let me know if the log file i sent sheds some life.
12  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Damaged wallet on: January 06, 2017, 07:25:26 PM
OK - will send via private msg right now.

BTW, 0.95.1 doesn't start on my OSX Sierra 10.12.2 - any fix?
That's a known issue. See: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1732805.0 for the fix

Logs sent.

I already checked and this fix did not work:

Quote
Armory definitely works for me on 10.12.2. Just sent and received coins today, actually. Smiley That said, can you do me a favor? Go to /Applications/Armory.app/Contents/MacOS/py/usr/lib/armory/armoryengine/ and edit ArmoryUtils.py at Line 1267. Once saved, start Armory and see if it finishes starting up.

Old:
Code:
LOGINFO('   Preferred Encoding    : ' + locale.getpreferredencoding())

New:
Code:
prefEnc = locale.getpreferredencoding()
if prefEnc == None:
   if os.environ.get('LC_ALL', '').upper() == 'UTF-8':
      prefEnc = 'utf-8'
   else:
      prefEnc = 'Unknown'
LOGINFO('   Preferred Encoding    : ' + prefEnc)

EDIT: Added a suggested fix.
13  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Damaged wallet on: January 06, 2017, 07:06:53 PM
Try upgrading to 0.95.1. IIRC this issue with "transaction does not exist in Armory's database" is one of the known bugs of 0.94.1.

Also, please post the Armory log files.

Which logs do you need?
Just go to File > Export Log Files and post the contents of the resulting file.

OK - will send via private msg right now.

BTW, 0.95.1 doesn't start on my OSX Sierra 10.12.2 - any fix?
14  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Damaged wallet on: January 06, 2017, 06:33:44 PM
Try upgrading to 0.95.1. IIRC this issue with "transaction does not exist in Armory's database" is one of the known bugs of 0.94.1.

Also, please post the Armory log files.

Which logs do you need?
15  Bitcoin / Armory / Damaged wallet on: January 06, 2017, 01:56:51 PM
I have a problem with a wallet.

It all began when I sent a transaction and when I clicked on it on the transaction list I got the "The transaction you requested be displayed does not exist in Armory's database" alert.

The problem persisted after a rebuild and a rescan.

I then tried to change the comment of the transaction as it seemed the wrong comment was displayed. The wallet completely disappeared from "Available Wallets".  I fixed it with "Fix Damaged Wallet" and it reappeared but the offending transaction still "does not exist in Armory's database. " Every time I try to change a comment on this wallet it disappears and I have to fix it.

Recovery.log has been sent via private message.

I'm worried this can be the start of a bigger problem with that wallet - please advise.

UPDATE: I realized that on  "Wallet Properties" no addresses were displayed for this wallet. On "addresses used" it said no addresses were used (which is wrong) but the total computed addresses seem right. I computed 100 extra addresses and now the wallet is "scanning" - I will updated when the scan is finished. I'm using Armory 0.94.1
16  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: December 12, 2016, 10:37:57 PM
After we pass the $785 mark on Stamp there's no real resistance until ATH. And you know what happens when we approach ATH, right? Media frenzy, irrational exuberance, and exponential we go.

On most other markets (Kraken, BTC-E, Huobi) that resistance point, which is the mid-June high, has already been broken. The other side of the story says that on Stamp we had a double or even triple top, which should be a bad signal.

But Bitcoin never gives a fuck about TA or double or triple tops. Up we go. I'm buying!




Why after 785 will we get past 800,900,1000 without too much trouble?

Not really, we will go to ATH (around $1200) with no real resistance and then we go exponential for a relatively short time before the crash - like it always happened. I've witnessed this shit three times already Cheesy

Probably the big rally will not be as exponential and short-lived as in Dec 2013, Apr. 2013 and June 2011 (when price started doubling every week) because the coin is getting mature and the market getting bigger, much more money is needed for the price to double - but its still a very small market which is very prone to big rallies and big crashes.
17  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: December 12, 2016, 10:32:52 PM
After we pass the $785 mark on Stamp there's no real resistance until ATH. And you know what happens when we approach ATH, right? Media frenzy, irrational exuberance, and exponential we go.

On most other markets (Kraken, BTC-E, Huobi) that resistance point, which is the mid-June high, has already been broken. The other side of the story says that on Stamp we had a double or even triple top, which should be a bad signal.

But Bitcoin never gives a fuck about TA or double or triple tops. Up we go. I'm buying!

18  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Armory 0.95.1 is out on: December 09, 2016, 11:29:12 AM
Hi.

Is 0.93 capable to sign off line transaction generated by 0.95 or I need to install new version on my off-line machine?

You are fine. You will need to upgrade when 0.96 comes out if you want sign SW transactions. If you do not create try to spend SW outputs, you won't need to upgrade.

Is there an easy way to avoid to create SW transactions using an updated (+0.13.1) Bitcoin Core once SW is activated?
19  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: PSA You must use 0.95+ in order to use Bitcoin Core 0.13.1+ after Segwit deploys on: November 24, 2016, 09:05:05 AM
So we basically need to update to 0.95+ both in the online and offline computers if we want to avoid compatibility issues, right? Could you please ELI5 the kind of issues we could face if we do not update?
You won't need to update the offline if you are not planning on using segwit.

If you do not update to 0.95+ but are using 0.13.1+ after segwit deploys, armory will simply not work. It will not be able to parse the blocks that 0.13.1 writes to the disk. IIRC it will simply hang at the initialization and look like it is doing something when nothing is really happening.

Furthermore:

Are  there offline bundles for 0.95+? I can only find offline bundles for 0.93.3.

Thanks.
No. There won't be any offline bundles until the release containing segwit (which should be 0.96).

Great. Basically this means that until 0.96 I can keep my current set up: 0.92.1 on the offline computer and 0.94.1 on the online one - right?

Thank you guys for your awesome work. Been using Armory for ages!
20  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: PSA You must use 0.95+ in order to use Bitcoin Core 0.13.1+ after Segwit deploys on: November 23, 2016, 03:38:00 PM
So we basically need to update to 0.95+ both in the online and offline computers if we want to avoid compatibility issues, right? Could you please ELI5 the kind of issues we could face if we do not update?

Furthermore:

Are  there offline bundles for 0.95+? I can only find offline bundles for 0.93.3.

Thanks.
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 ... 260 »
Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!