|
All sold out! I hope you guys enjoy them, second batch should come sometime today!
|
|
|
|
one more hint it has a five in it  |
|
|
|
Well.. There are a few lucky numbers at 5-50. Those would be 7, 9, 13, 15 , 21, 25, 31, 33, 37, 43 and 49.
If you get that down to only the lucky prime numbers, that would be 7, 13, 31, 37 and 43.
7 and 13 have already been guessed, that leaves 31 37 and 43.
So my guess would be any of those three :p
see The game is simple. 1. Guess the numbers(3) I have written down (on paper) 2. I will PM that person for an address to send the comic 3. That person will receive a free comic book that I have been creating in a collaboration with some others. This will not be one of the "first editions" of the comic book, but rather one of the second batch. Please post only one number at a time, but you can enter multiple times.The "Lucky Number" is between 5-50 but you can guess as many times as your like Please don't spam.It is rather dark and fucked up so...know that. Good Luck  Sorry, try again. |
|
|
|
|
As many guesses as you like.
|
|
|
|
|
keep guessing everyone!
I will narrow results
the "Lucky Number" is between 5-50
|
|
|
|
Whoops. Okay, 9
see Lucky 9!
sorry  try again |
|
|
|
13 or 14? 13 because it's 'lucky' and 14 because it is the number of episodes of Firefly  shit my bad. dq'd for double guess. 14! Shit that is wrong, but would have been a good one |
|
|
|
Whats the range we can choose from ? If it goes up to infinity, I go for 21million, otherwise I go for 4 ^^ Range is 5-100 Still no right answers keep guessin' |
|
|
|
John is the only way to go. Thirded. |
|
|
|
|
So far no one has guessed the last lucky number!
Keep guessing! One guess per post pls
|
|
|
|
Yeah, CtC even lost money once in a transaction because he tries to get the BTC out as fast as possible, and with the unsteady price in coins some BTC places just sit on your money till it becomes profitable again. Not with CryptCurrent; that guy is really working to get the coins to you ASAP.To me it really leaves no alternative. Long live CryptoCurrent.com! |
|
|
|
How about lucky number... 7?
Both 7 and 42 have been picked. Anyone else? I'll accept one more "lucky" number |
|
|
|
Fun game, is it between one and ten? If so, 6. If not, 42.
Of course 42 is another correct answer. There is one answer left. I'll PM you in a sec damn...i thought this would last longer... |
|
|
|
I am feeling lucky so I will guess 7
LuckyNumberS7even is correct. There are two more correct answers all having to do with traditional "lucky" numbers Nice guess Limie i'll PM you in a sec |
|
|
|
trusted vendors only
Try cryptocurrent.com its what I use all the time. Love that guy, always on time and super friendly service. |
|
|
|
Bitcoins are different from dollars in this case. If dollars get lost and no dollars can be created anymore, deflation will occur, and you will inevitably be able to pay for your house with a penny, leaving no coins to buy your bread with.
Bitcoins will get lost when people die, but too slowly to initiate great deflation. If the process drives the price up gradually, we will just use smaller fractions of Bitcoin.
Correct, until we can't anymore. Those decimals only go so far; it has a limit as well, and it's 21mil^-8 or something like that. I am not sure. |
|
|
|
Exponential deflation is not a problem when the factor is relatively small (say, 3% or so). The crude death rate, according to Wikipedia, is 8.37 per 1000 per year, or 0.837%. If dying people have 3.58 times as many Bitcoins in their wallets than living people on average, we would see 3% deflation due to deaths. I don't think that's too unrealistic of a figure.
Then again, I would speculate that most people of advanced age or otherwise anticipating death soon would have a will to pass their Bitcoins to their descendants, which would mitigate this effect. I also think that other economic factors would have a much larger impact on prices than people taking their Bitcoins to their grave, so to speak.
Besides, we already have exponential inflation with USD of about 3% over the last 100 years, and it hasn't been a massive problem.
I wasn't talking about other economic crisis, I am talking about the future of the virtual currency. Also, you can make as much USD as you want, until we run out of trees that is, but BTC has a definitive cap of 21mil. Nothing more. Ever. Slowly this could cause problems, not in the foreseeable future ( BTC is not suppose to reach the cap till sometime in the 2100's) but it is still a possibly problem to be faced. Stop comparing USD to BTC. In the later stages, if we get there, there will be no comparison. Now THAT I am just speculating upon. Again, I want to reiterate I have never studied econ except in college while studying computer science so I just didn't care about the subject while there were more interesting things happening that haven't been done before. So I am in no way a good source of information on these subjects. I just saw a potential flaw, even though small now, which could jeopardize BTC in the far future to a bitter end within its very early stages (now). If this is true, and not fixed, that means that BTC will have a very short lifespan. I would rather take the future with BTC than with USD. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
