это просто пиздец какой то, мальбороза доебался до меня и хочет узнать почему я добавил в эксклюд тех кого я добавил, спать сука хочет пойти но желает узнать)) а actmyname не может успокоиться что я называю его рабом))) и предтсавляете они заявляют что я не правильно сделал что добавил уважаемых людей в ексклюд))) я сру с них стоя  So tell us your reasons. Why have you excluded all these accounts and suggested everyone to exclude them? its important?
Now, why this sounds so familiar...  Yes, it is important. i will if you tell me why it iportant for you I can't sleep because of it. Tell me so I can go to bed. Fair enough? lets go to bed  go to sleep ill tell you tomorow IF you tell me why it interestig for you I have nightmares, dreaming ~ ~ ~ ~. Sometimes in colors. Tell me and I won't have nightmares. я эту подпись еще дней 5 поношу и если за 5 дней я не встречу поддержки или хотя бы 1 человек не возьмет себе подпись я умываю руки |
|
|
|
So tell us your reasons. Why have you excluded all these accounts and suggested everyone to exclude them? its important?
Now, why this sounds so familiar... Yes, it is important. i will if you tell me why it iportant for you I can't sleep because of it. Tell me so I can go to bed. Fair enough? lets go to bed go to sleep ill tell you tomorow IF you tell me why it interestig for you Your premises of the slave or Lauda's pet label are still invalid and have not yet rejected the null hypothesis.
its your opinion and its false |
|
|
|
Now, why this sounds so familiar... Yes, it is important. i will if you tell me why it iportant for you also i can answer all of your questions thus I have a litle bit of respect to you..still  but it temporarily Similar to accepting premises as valid without evidence, if you have no foundation for the inclusion or exclusion of members then you are doing so without any reason. If there is no foundation to one's actions -- if they act without a rationale, then clearly their actions matter less than someone who does have a solid backing for their decisions. This is similar to the acceptance of pragmatism: if one doesn't believe in it, then their beliefs don't matter. hey slave i answered you you have no authority to ask me cos you slave and Lauda's pet i will answer to marlboroza if he will want |
|
|
|
It was rhetorical question.
It was rhetorical answer So tell us your reasons. Why have you excluded all these accounts and suggested everyone to exclude them? its important?
Now, why this sounds so familiar... Yes, it is important. i will if you tell me why it iportant for you also i can answer all of your questions thus I have a litle bit of respect to you..still but it temporarily |
|
|
|
You don't know why you have Admiral in trust list?
see above You must remember the reason why you excluded these members and why you suggested people to exclude them: ~ Vod
~ SaltySpitoon
~ TMAN
~ Lauda
~ Blazed
~ suchmoon
~ owlcatz
~ yahoo62278
~ actmyname
~ Lutpin ? i remember most of them but not all its important? ~Snip~
sorry Pharmacist i forget about you and even not exluded (apparently you are not very important) you also Lauda's pet she has too much fucking pets as you as actmyname i cant remember all of you my apologies |
|
|
|
P1) Lauda is a proven scammer
P2) I am Lauda's pet
P3) A pet of a proven scammer is also a scammer.
C) I am a scammer.
None of your premises can be considered sound without definitive evidence however I will make it easy for you.
Suppose that P1 is true. Prove that P2 and P3 are true, thus creating sound conclusion that follows from sound premises.
who are you to ask proof ? you just fucking slave and you think i must spend my expensive time for you? proving who are you? you must be enough accusation and shut up not write here |
|
|
|
@peloso do you have evidence of my scams, or is that just a lie?
@TheFuzzStone who are you? I have no idea who you even are.
DT1 is susceptible to 51% attacks without third-party intervention so if there is a cj group, that's pretty bad.
as you know i never lie you wanna evidence of your scams? FIRST! Lauda is proven scammer, you are Lauda's pet so if you pet of scammer you also scammer  you not agree? do you wanna SECOND? |
|
|
|
i dont know/remember |Admiral| i dont know why i have positive feedback from him
i didnt make investigation about Admiral and dont know he as scammer
Why do you have Admiral in your trust list then? i not remember and still not started investigation |
|
|
|
You included a known scammer into your trust list, which makes other users question your judgement. That has nothing to do with sending feedback but if you included that person because you received positive feedback from them - that's even worse.
he is scammer by your Lauda and TMAN versions so i dont trust your vesion cos Lauda is proven scammer TMAN is proven asshole and you support they i didnt make investigation about Admiral and dont know he as scammer |
|
|
|
TMAN has absolutely not abused his position. He is free to exclude anyone at any time for any reason. Now, if you really want to talk about abuse let's start with this:
realy? so why you buthurt when im and others exclude you ? we are also free to exclude you and your mafia TMAN, you're coming across as a real asshole here. and it realy true p.s each sensible user should immediately remove default trust and make own list |
|
|
|
|
кедми уебок и гнилье впрочем как и все ватники друзья соловьева по этому он такй и внимают его уебки вроде гены
|
|
|
|
Xenon131 has escrow scammer( quacksy) in trust network and peloso has scammer |Admiral| who has default on loan and there is solid connection between Admiral and pinkman, chivasregal and some other accounts. I don't know who is owner of the account at the moment as account has probably changed hand. It can't be trusted. hey! are you sick? i sure yes i dont know/remember |Admiral| i dont know why i have positive feedback from him aдso you can see nobogy get positive feedback from me so i added you to my include list and by your stupid logic you are scammer ? because you connected to Admiral through me you are fucking genius |
|
|
|
|
кто ни будь помнит? до нововедений можно было удалять дофолттраст ?
|
|
|
|
@ LoyceV can you scrap trust lists of all accounts mentioned in topic? I have nothing to do right now, so.. I hope I'm not invading anyone's privacy since all data is public. #7 peloso HostFat (1)
OgNasty (1)
Vod (-1)
Tomatocage (1)
SaltySpitoon (-1)
TMAN (-1)
Lauda (-1)
Mad_Max (1)
UserCoin (1)
DefaultTrust (-1)
Blazed (-1)
aTriz (-1)
suchmoon (-1)
ancientcoins (1)
owlcatz (-1)
yahoo62278 (-1)
MaoChao (1)
actmyname (-1)
Lutpin (-1)
TheFuzzStone (1)
GAMORA (1)
|Admiral| (1)
aliborn (1)
xenon131 (1)
Spotika4 (1)
Wananavu99 (1)
3meek (1)
chimk (1)
temarazin (1)
Alex_Sr (1)
esmanthra (1)
taikuri13 (1)
UPPEX (1)
DabLjat (1) this is wrong and old my list is updated |
|
|
|
you say peloso trying manipulate but you lie
i see here your manipulation like this (~ takav mrak ) and this (~ Triz ) there is no such names
next time please dont lie
I translated thread from Russian to Croatian and then to English. Above should be quotation, but accidentally, I quoted translated post, I mean I forget to put it under quotation. Will edit post. You are trying to manipulate, that is obvious. so you wrong translated from english to english and making mistake call me manipulator? that verry funny anyway.. it so interesting for me to know how im manipulate ? you mean my signature ? or my trust list that i published? This seems to be peloso's attempt to convince other users to distrust actmyname and others who neg-trusted him, not a genuine attempt at building custom lists.
i hope you know what to do when you seems not other users  just proven scammers ( lauda) and assholes ( tman e.t.c) |
|
|
|
Закопай топор войны. Просто не надо с ними общаться.
эт почему? назови хотя бы одну причину? и вообще у теймоса желание чтоб каждый сам настроил свои списки ОН ТАК ХОЧЕТ я с ним согласен и руками и ногами за так кто такие эти шавки чтоб противиться этому желанию им не нравится как я это делаю? т.е наступая на них) так я это будут делать и буду наступать на них давя их агитирую всех ) вот это им не нравится ) и бесятся) смотрика там все собрались и даже лояльные им модеры чистят мои конструктивные посты а их высеры остаются но я готов и к этому по барабану нельзя с таким врагом быть пацифистом, поройтесь посмотрите как они издевались над теми людьми которых красили незаслуженно и которые теряли деньги от этого нельзя это все так оставлять да! один в поле не воин но это не про меня |
|
|
|
#54 peloso want's Russian united and suggested everyone to exclude these members:
~ Vod
~ SaltySpitoon
~ TMAN
~ Lauda
~ Blazed
~ Triz
~ takav mrak
~ owlcatz
~ yahoo62278
~ actmyname
~ Lutpin
That's it from me, I don't see anything wrong in this discussion except peloso person is trying to manipulate with people and some shitting on Lauda. So far it seems like regular discussion.
@ LoyceV can you scrap trust lists of all accounts mentioned in topic?
you say peloso trying manipulate but you lie i see here your manipulation like this (~ takav mrak ) and this (~ Triz ) there is no such names next time please dont lie also i not shitting Lauda a just said she is scammer and it fact and true even if you not like it |
|
|
|
Если биржи будут отказываться от прохождения инвесторами KYC, то они рискуют потерять своих клиентов, так как те в свою очередь будут стремиться к безопасности и защите со стороны государства, поэтому врятли будут так же активно пользоваться децентрализованными биржами, которые вызывают опасения в связи с участившимися взломами бирж и кражей инвестиций пользователей!
кус ни когда не был и не будет гарантией или даже намеком безопасности и клиенты понимающие всегда будут против кус по одной простой причине кус это абсурд |
|
|
|
In a while, when everyone sets his own DT0 and excludes DefaultTrust entry from it, that DT1 constructed by algo will be obsolete, I believe.
and process is started |
|
|
|
ну если ты веришь не мне а основателю трона тогда устанавливай |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
