Binance is one of the biggest exchangers who be very selective in choosing an IEO on their platform, because usually projects that run IEO on binance are projects that have a pretty good reputation, and this will certainly make the project cartesi grow because the investor confidence will increase after they collaborated with the Binance platform, congratulations to all bounties participants who have participated in the cartesi project, hopefully they will get a large income from the cartesi project.

I personally am not sure if the ripple will be able to penetrate at the price of $5 this year, although the ripple has been widely adopted by several financial institutions, but still it does not have a major influence on the increase in ripple prices in the market, especially now that the ripple has price resistance which is quite difficult to be broken at the price level of $0.19- $0.20, although the price barrier of $0.20 can be broken later, but if we look at the current ripple price chart, the possibility of price increases that occur is very small.

It is indeed quite unfortunate at this time ,Because in the beginning of the emergence of the xcrypt project, many people predicted that if this project would be able to grow rapidly, but in fact, now the xcrypt project is starting to be abandoned by many people, and it seems the team has also lost the idea to be able to re-lift and developing this xcrypt exchange project in the future, I think the current team needs the right steps to re-create the xcrypt exchanger project, but if it fails, it is certain that this project will also really die.

Many people say if this project is a scam and ceo they have taken away money from investors and traders to take a tour, is that right or wrong? From the beginning of their project emergence I was very interested in what they offered to the tele community, including with their sim card which in my opinion was very beneficial for its users but suddenly the issue of scam beat up to the tele project and made it difficult to develop again.

Some information circulates that if a refund is made by liquid which is indeed one of the exchangers who have full rights to the sale of telegram tokens to investors, and this is due to the cancellation of the TON blockchain mainline launch on time and if indeed the launch will occur in the future, of course everything will return to normal in my opinion and with the cancellation of the telegram token  will certainly be many people who feel disappointed and according to the problem between the telegram coin and facebook coin is the same problem as a regulation problem.

I see the price of tokens they continue to experience price increases in exchange, and I am confused whether the transaction was actually carried out by the traders or by teams that play the market? There is no point for us to hope that they will send payments to bounty participants because clearly they are the biggest fraud project ever in my opinion, I have repeatedly sent emails to their team, but none of the responses they gave, if you want please just try it support@jinbitoken.io

I still remember very well how successful this project was, and when they held prizes and airdrops, many participants participated in their project at that time and as I recall many participants who made quite a lot of incomes participating in this project, hopefully the team will be able to return the swissborg project that success and can also increase the price of the CHSB token instead, honestly I really hope that projects like swissborg will reappear in the forum.

It's better for us to choose altcoin which already has the top rank in coinmarketcap today, than we have to invest in altcoin like CVCC coins that don't have a lot of exchanges, and also volume, usually coins like this will only make us suffer losses because of the coins don't have developments that are clear and may only end up being junk coins in the future.

Almost all exchanges have fees and minimum limits in withdrawals for their users, and of course as users we must be observant in choosing altcoin which is good for to withdraw from the exchange and one of them is by choosing altcoin which indeed only deducts a small fee as transaction costs, my advice is better to choose altcoin withdrawal from the exchange by using altcoin which does have a cheap price on the exchange because usually the altcoin fee will not be too expensive, I often make withdrawals using ltc, trx, and eth coins in certain exchanges.

Although Ieo is not better than Ico, but at least Ieo can make investors feel more secure in participating Ieo, because investors do not need to be afraid or worried if later the coin does not have an exchange like Ico coins, because usually projects that put on Ieo in an exchange such as probit, binance or other exchanges certainly most likely the tokens will be listed on the exchange.

Of many altcoins that do have a guarantee of a bright future why do we have to choose a new altcoin that does not have a clear future? If I were personally, I would not risk risking my money on the newly developing altcoin because it clearly has the potential to lose the money I have. It's better for me to keep investing in old altcoins like eth, bch, bnb and even bitcoin which has been recognized by the world.

Bounty manager is an extension of the team to manage their bounty project, and of course we as bounty participants also cannot 100% blame the bounty manager, if indeed the project fails and is fraudulent, because to my knowledge the managers are also paid when the project is finished unless the manager who handles bounty projects with BTC fees usually there will be someone who acts as an escrow so that payments for bounty participants will be guaranteed, but if the project pays with coin ico of course the manager will get paid after the project is complete and all spreadsheet data has been sent to the project team, but if the project is fraudulent, of course the manager will usually not get paid the same as the bounty participants.

          Proof of authentication:
Week 12
Join signature campaign

 -BitcoinTalk name : Roidz
- BTT url : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=821374
- Rank :  Senior  Member
- Starting Post Count 744
- telegram : @Roidz123

I personally prefer to choose short-term investments to get profits even though the profits can be of small value, but in my opinion, it is very (profitable) than we make long-term investments that do require us to hold altcoin in the long time and of course long-term investments have risks which is greater than we choose short-term investments.

If we calculate in total, of course many projects have ignored bounty participants after their tokens have been listed in the market, and some projects even have token prices high enough on several exchanges, but there is no clear reason why they have not paid the participants until now?
There are two, bounties that I have participated in and their tokens have been registered in several markets but have not paid the participants, such as;

1. jinby
2. Boltcoin.

Successful people are people who learn from each other's mistakes, such as Thomas Alva Edison who made mistakes 999 times in creating lamp, so that, the 1000th experiment is successful, so that everyone who wants to succeed must be prepared to fail so that eventually success will accompany him, more good try, fail and get back up. if we are afraid of mistakes / fail before doing it of course we never know whether our work will succeed or fail, and failure is a delayed success.

The renewal of new requirements made by YouTube now seems very strict and it seems that this only applies to small channels that do provide Cryptocurrency content because according to some news reports many large business channels related to crypto escaping the cull. And of course this is a threat to the world of Cryptocurrency because youtube is one of the largest video sharing platforms in the world and of course the ban might also have an effect on banning crypto on google like an issue that was once circulating in the past.

Being a bounty hunter is not something fun right now, because after our work is done according to the rules set by the manager, but the income we accept is far from feasible and not even paid at all, it's difficult now that we can get a good project because if we see the appearance  and white paper of all projects of course they all offer good things for us both investors and bounty hunters.

I disagree with your opinion Because, in my opinion the big or small bonus will certainly greatly affect the price movement in the market, when the token is listed, Because, in reality today many projects that offer large bonuses experience price dumps in the market, maybe for investors large bonuses is a profit so at least when the price of the token goes down, but they can still benefit from the bonus received, but for traders or investors who buy after the bonus period ends, of course they only get a loss when the price of the token dump, we can imagine if there are 100 big investors buy tokens in large quantities and of course plus a 40% token bonus and when tokens are listed on the market then they sell tokens simultaneously, will it not make a dump price?

Almost all the exchangers mentioned are small exchangers and have a small transactions volume, so in my opinion if the costs to hold IEO on the trading platform will certainly not require a lot of costs to remember the capacity of the exchanger which does not have a high ranking in CMC, it is different from the exchanger big ones like binance, bitforex and others who do have high trust from traders so the costs required to do IEO are of course also big.