I have little doubt that VytautasK is a scammer for the reasons stated here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1669877.msg16848420#msg16848420

It's amazing that he still is at large, scamming more people with spectrocoin and other sites, with all the reports published.

Check:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1515839.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1669877.0
https://www.scambitcoin.com/spectrocoin/
https://www.mywot.com/scorecard/spectrocoin.com

I'm vouching for the OP.

(I'm a newbie, but an old member of bitcointalk).

Made a new deal with the OP and paid it.

Just received the gmail account and the recover email, with their passwords.

He even used a recover email from the provider I asked.

Just bought and paid 0.0015 eth for one gmail account from the OP.

So far, he was helpful.

Op, with those ridiculous threats you just made spectrocoin manager a favor, since now he thinks you won't go to the authorities.

Remove those threats. You don't need money to go to the police. This is criminal fraud. An email will be enough.

You post passwords, threats, but not one evidence that those end addresses are from Spectrocoin.

However, on the other side, there is another person who also makes mistakes one after the other.

Clearly, the OP didn't fulfill the burden of evidence he had. He even said a transfer of 40 btcs was made to spectrocoin when the address isn't from spectrocoin.

But, thanks to spectrocoin manager mistakes, we can conclude a few things that point out for spectrocoin being a selective scam.

a) The OP is indeed a spectrocoin customer. The manager acknowledge this clearly.

b) The OP's account was blocked by spectrocoin.

c) Spectrocoin manager didn't even try to present any ground for blocking his account. He just denied his balance amount of 100 btcs.

d) Clearly, the OP has a balance at his account. We don't know how much.

e) The OP claimed his account was blocked when spectrocoin demanded him to present a tax declaration. I defied the manager to deny this. He didn't. It seems that spectrocoin indeed uses this pretext to block customers' accounts. At least in this case.

f) It seems the OP has a high amount at his account or spectrocoin wouldn't ask for any tax declaration.

g) The Op even presented a tax declaration. But his account is still blocked. The manager didn't even tried to justify this or the reason why he rejected the tax declaration.

I have enough evidence to qualify spectrocoin as a selective scammer.

Any customer with a high balance at spectrocoin is at a serious risk.

I just gave spectrocoin manager another negative feedback because of this thread.

I invite all members to do the same.

I have nothing against spectrocoin or its manager. But this looks like a scam at miles away.

I wrote the OP a message explaining what he can do to burn spectrocoin manager.

As this fellow member wrote, we might accept this scan as provisional evidence that you indeed had about 72 bitcoins in your circle account and that you sent them.

However, you should assure that you are indeed the owner of at least one of the addresses you used to send bitcoins by signing a message from it.

But, now, above all, you should show evidence that those end addresses are from sprectrocoin.

Anyway, saying that your transfer of 40 btcs (if it was yours) to the nigerian address was made also to Spectrocoin was a blow on your credibility. It's hard to believe it was a mistake. Didn't you know to where you sent the 40 btcs, the biggest transfer?

You only showed some evidence of about 72 btcs sent (with no evidence that it was made to spectrocoin). If you only sent about 72 btcs and you are trying to steal 28 more from spectrocoin that is a stupid thing to do. You are risking losing the 72 btcs.

As was written, posting your password to spectrocoin was even more stupid. Are you crazy? Remove that and change the password, if you can. And invent a better one, with symbols.

Is your account blocked, but you can access it, or is the login blocked?

If you can access it, why don't you do a scan of the balance or of the deposit history?

Show us any evidence that those end addresses are from Spectrocoin.

If you only have a 72 btcs balance on spectrocoin, it's time to start saying the truth and we might help you.

Spectrocoin confirmed that you are a customer, that your account was blocked and, implicitly, that you have a balance there. If they indeed asked you for a tax declaration, clearly, you have a high balance or they wouldn't bother.

Spectrocoin thinks they can do whatever they want, but they are very wrong. You can ruin spectrocoin with one well written email to a particular destiny about this issue and you can ruin the reputation of spectrocoin manager for good. We just have to tell you how.

After the fishy measures spectrocoin adopted against the other complainer, it seems they didn't learn the lesson.

We are still waiting for explanations from Spectrocoin:
If the OP hasn't 100 btcs, what is the real balance? And don't excuse yourself with privacy, the OP waived all privacy. He posted all personal information for us to see.
Why are you allegedly enforcing foreign tax regulations arbitrarily?
Why didn't you accept the tax declaration that the OP sent you and unblocked his account?

The spectrocoin manager hasn't post any evidence that the OP/complainer was a fraudster (I agree that the fact that the complainer never posted anything more makes him lose some credibility).

Any company that freezes customers funds has a heavy burden of proof to fulfill. The accusations of privacy infringement doesn't make sense.

Until evidence is posted, spectrocoin will still be under suspicion on the eyes of the community.

To the OP:

I didn't see evidence of the "100 btcs" on your scans or evidence that you are the owner of the addresses you posted or that the end addresses are Spectrocoin ones.

You post a scan of the balance of your account and, also if you lost access to it and you don't have a previous scan of your balance, post evidence that the bitcoin addresses are spectrocoin's addresses.

Actually, after losing some time, the main transfer of 40 btcs sent to 13DXgLGUjAeATptpCowj9ZnXB6SrwLvN78 was moved (as usual on exchanges and wallets online) to the final address of https://blockchain.info/address/1KPbWe5biV3uUSMU7hTDjwZXszQKxDMNSa

Well, this final address doesn't seem to be a Spectrocoin address, but an address involved recently on a scam:
https://cointelegraph.com/news/hackers-strip-nigerian-exchange-of-15000-worth-of-bitcoins

So, you have presented no evidence of your 100btcs.

Post evidence that 1FJ4dFPxchnMqFS1sJo38Px5qJjcPKV6Pa, 16tLXCGSjmamvfWdJdvvwWo2SaPJWkRG8m, 1BUSB22Qv9vC6EAiCJ1C2vjbrAv5bdF3oA or 13DXgLGUjAeATptpCowj9ZnXB6SrwLvN78 are Spectrocoin addresses and the source addresses are yours or I won't lose more time with this.

To the spectrocoin manager:


I didn't read any allegation from you that the tax declaration demand from Spectrocoin as posted by the complainer was also fake.

So, at the very least, it seems Spectrocoin accepts the creation of anonymous accounts (don't claim TOS that you don't enforce or enforce only when you arbitrarily want), but when the customer has a lot of money, blocks his account and blackmails the customer asking for tax declarations?
Now you enforce foreign tax regulations?! How convenient!

We, bitcoiners, "love" bitcoin companies that accept anonymous accounts, but after they have a balance, start blackmailing customers asking for personal documents and tax documents.

Of course, this demand for tax declarations might be seen as a pretext to steal customers' founds.

Actually, it seems the complainer presented some kind of tax declaration: https://imgur.com/1nM4cpy


And I'm very far from accepting your allegations on this previous thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1586595.20

You present evidence that the complainer was a fraudster (I agree that the fact that the complainer never posted anything more makes him lose some credibility) or you will still be under suspicion on the eyes of the community. The accusations of privacy infringement doesn't make sense.

I agree with the assessment. Also gave negative feedback.

Spectrocoin answer was very damaging to their reputation. They didn't deny the facts or timing.

If they stole the money, the OP had reasons to present them a fake ID, since they were basically blackmailing him to give personal documents: give them or lose your money.

If the OP is responsible for any fraud, once he takes the issue to the community, Spectrocoin has a duty to present evidence to the community or face the consequences on their reputation.

I disagree that they can be accused of any privacy infringement for explaining the reasons. The OP waived privacy about any necessary details (not unnecessary ones, like his identity, fake or not) to explain the freezing by taking the issue public.

If Spectrocoin doesn't present better reasons on a few days, I'll post here steps that the OP can take to burn the rest of Spectrocoin reputation and Spectrocoin owner's reputation.

For start I suggest the OP to change the title to Spectrocoin SCAM/Review for SEO reasons. This is probably already on Google. Anyone searching for reputation on Spectrocoin will find it in a second.

If Spectrocoin presents any evidence/convincing grounds, I'll remove my negative feedback and this post.

Yes it's my first post but I'm not a recent member.