Bitcoin Forum
May 14, 2024, 12:44:00 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1]
1  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Ripple Giveaway! on: April 01, 2013, 04:54:19 PM
rGj3p7bcsohHcpybegK6qYhfnm2PdWcW84
2  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Reading Kevin's post has opened my eyes, and this is all I have to say to MtGox on: June 20, 2011, 10:45:39 PM
OK, for now on I will be sure to make all my posts as individual threads (especially when there are several others that are specifically regarding the topic of my opinion) Roll Eyes
3  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Reading Kevin's post has opened my eyes, and is all I have to say to Mt. Gox on: June 20, 2011, 10:27:26 PM
Let me guess...Your personal opinion is so important that it must have its own thread?
4  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: EFF donations and the Bitcoin Faucet on: June 20, 2011, 08:46:42 PM
I suspect this decision was made so as not to let their position regarding digital currency (esp. bitcoin) appear to be biased.

We shall see.
5  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Jacob Appelbaum: "Bitcoin Prediction: Major bugs in the near future ..." on: June 20, 2011, 08:00:46 PM
Hmmmmm...
6  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: DIRECT DOWNLOAD LINK FOR LEAKED MT. GOX ACCOUNT DATABASE (CSV FILE) on: June 20, 2011, 06:05:38 PM
Well, went to login to my google account this morning and had to make a new password because of "suspicious activity" trying to access the account I guess...
7  Bitcoin / Press / Re: Bitcoin press hits, notable sources on: June 13, 2011, 11:53:23 PM


Podcast starts with some pretty good coverage of Anonymous vs. Bernanke/FED and moves into some pretty good bitcoin coverage:

http://www.cnet.com/8301-19709_1-20070866-10/buzz-out-loud-1488-sharks-with-frickin-lasers-on-their-heads-podcast/?tag=mncol;title
8  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoins is on Yahoo frontpage - Brace for impact people. on: June 11, 2011, 08:04:41 AM
The Bitcoin Triples Again

by Jack Hough
Friday, June 10, 2011

The online currency has minted off-line millionaires. But for how long?

Really?...Really???
9  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: US Default = Rise in BTC price or fall in BTC price? on: June 10, 2011, 06:01:08 PM

More Austrian politics wrapped in the language of economics.

Problems with blaming "entitlements" for national bankruptcy in this article:

1) Doesn't include Missing Trillions from the Pentagon: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/01/29/eveningnews/main325985.shtml
2) Doesn't take into account Trillions of dollars spent on pointless wars over the past 20 years.
3) Endless subsidy of nearly 0% interest loans to Wall St. banks.
4) Loves CDS (Credit Default Swaps) which are effectively insurance without any capital to back them up which used to be legal and still should be which had a huge role in the collapse and bailout.
5) Never considers any tax changes or increases to shore up whatever deficit these programs have.

But of course that's not a problem for him, because Austrian economics are often used in our modern time for the justification of the looting of what remains of our government.  The reason they preach that the sky is falling with regards to Medicaid and Social Security is that they don't want to pay for Medicaid (the rich) and they want to loot Social Security and privatize it.



I really don't know where to begin with your reply, but I would initially like to point out that your assertions are quite disingenuous.

If you would like to reply to the articles in my post, please do - but if you choose to ignore them and place your own accusations and political agenda upon a false reply, it only reflects poorly upon yourself and your positions.

First, your opening accusation "More Austrian politics wrapped in the language of economics" is incorrect in more than one way.
1. The correct phrasing would be "More libertarian politics wrapped in the language of Austrian economics".
2. While Hummel does incorporate some Austrian positions in economics, he is not an Austrian economist, his personal economics (from his own explanation) incorporates neo-classical positions as well as others.

Regarding your "entitlements" rundown:

1. There may be trillions of dollars missing from the Pentagon and I am sure the Author shares your dislike.
2. The Author does not support state-sponsored wars (why do you phrase the question in an accusatory way?)
3. Again, you phrase your question in an accusatory way, as if the Author supports this action.
4. In which article does the Author support CDS?
5. I'm sure a $.02 National sales tax will take care of that... - /sarcasm


Regarding 1, 2 and 3 its really all the same: where you plan on closing the budget shortfalls.  My position is to go after the crooks, looters, plutocrats and the author of this article clearly (from this article) thinks that it is easier to squeeze the public that has little or no representation to ensure that his savings and holdings aren't devalued through inflation.  It's simply a matter of values.  With economics all the policies around employment, interest rates, infrastruture investment, bank withholdings, etc are all questions to which people will arrive at totally different conclusions based on what they want out of the system.  I'm no different, but neither are you and neither is this author.  If you can show me other articles where he goes after 1, 2 and 3 with as much force I'll be pleasantly surprised but that still won't mean that he wrote this piece, choosing to go after the little guy than the big crooks.

4.  "Surely the purchasers of the U.S. Treasury CDS have not overlooked this risk, which would be reflected in a lower annual premium for less-valuable insurance."  
Here he gives CDS (credit default swaps) an air of legitimacy by calling them insurance. CDS claim to be insurance without meeting requirements that insurance companies must: capital withholding.  Giving them the title of "insurance" is an endorsement.  Imagine your car insurance company didn't have any capital to insure you?  That's what a CDS is essentially: deregulated insurance.  More of a bet actually, a bet with borrowed money or savings deposits that shouldn't even be on the market to begin with.

5.  Cute.  I'm sure we could both come up with a bunch of made up taxes that won't work to solve our problems.  But what does that solve?  While a sales tax is what way to raise revenue there are many others and people need to start considering them.

You should probably attempt to discard of whatever pre-determined assumptions you had when first approaching the articles and re-read both, while setting your personal bias aside as far as possible.
10  Bitcoin / Press / Re: Bitcoin press hits, notable sources on: June 10, 2011, 05:04:27 PM


Discover Magazine 6/10/11:

http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2011/06/10/everything-you-want-to-know-about-bitcoin-the-digital-currency-worth-more-than-the-dollar/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+80beats+%2880beats%29
11  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Gavin will visit the CIA on: June 10, 2011, 04:44:39 PM
if gavin reminds the cia to tell congress to take back the power to coin currency, i support his trip. fuck the federal reserve being a private company. i want that shit run by congress members.

I just had to quote for the sake of irony.  It would not have meant much without your username.  Grin
12  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: John Stossel talks about the Bitcoin on: June 09, 2011, 06:33:42 AM
john stossel is an idiot.  even if he's right, he's still an idiot.

someday i hope to perfect a fission-like device that will fire stossel and geraldo rivera at each other in a magnetic containment tube - causing them to release all their energy in an orgasmic burst of...

...teh dumb.

And you're an ass.  This was a neutral blog post, what is your problem with Stossel?  Are you his ex-wife or what?

well creighto, i don't like people with the kind of forum that stossel has who lie about facts to support a political point of view:

http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=1133

...i don't like those who abuse the tax advantages of charitable institutions:

http://www.thenation.com/article/teflon-correspondent

...i am especially ticked off by global warming deniers - and hugely more so by those who lie and use unjustified character assassination to spread the disinformation that harms us all:

http://www.fair.org/activism/stossel-tampering.html

but other than that - and a few dozen more things about him that i won't burden you with - he certainly has a nice mustache.

I'm sorry, but when the first accusational fact I search for from your sourced fair.org article is proven to be a blatant lie - the rest of your post (as well as your claims and positions) lose all credibility.

Quote
Stossel's errors are often so obvious that one wonders how they could have ended up on the air. In a 20/20 report on medical research (10/11/99), Stossel complained that too much funding was going to AIDS research, claiming that spending on the disease was "25 times more than on Parkinson's, which kills more people."

In fact, AIDS killed more than 16,000 people in the United States in 1999--down from 43,000 in 1995. Parkinson's, which is not itself generally fatal but contributes to other illnesses, has a mortality rate of 2 per 100,000 to less than 1 per 100,000, depending on the demographic group (BC Medical Journal, 4/01)--which works out to a death toll in the United States of less than 4,000 per year.

http://www.wolframalpha.com/entities/death/parkinson's_disease/e7/rk/ut/

http://www.wolframalpha.com/entities/death/HIV_AIDS/g5/8f/bn/


Maybe it is time to reconsider YOUR biased opinions?
13  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Anyone else here went through the Dot Com bubble in 1999? It is the same thing. on: June 08, 2011, 12:41:51 AM
all the hype and news surrounding bitcoins sound like they exactly did back in 1999 when pets.com stock was worth $600 per share.

Spam Troll much?
14  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Reminder - 60% of world population cannot access computer so Bitcoins will fail. on: June 08, 2011, 12:27:19 AM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Near_field_communication
 Wink
15  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: US Default = Rise in BTC price or fall in BTC price? on: June 07, 2011, 10:30:37 PM

More Austrian politics wrapped in the language of economics.

Problems with blaming "entitlements" for national bankruptcy in this article:

1) Doesn't include Missing Trillions from the Pentagon: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/01/29/eveningnews/main325985.shtml
2) Doesn't take into account Trillions of dollars spent on pointless wars over the past 20 years.
3) Endless subsidy of nearly 0% interest loans to Wall St. banks.
4) Loves CDS (Credit Default Swaps) which are effectively insurance without any capital to back them up which used to be legal and still should be which had a huge role in the collapse and bailout.
5) Never considers any tax changes or increases to shore up whatever deficit these programs have.

But of course that's not a problem for him, because Austrian economics are often used in our modern time for the justification of the looting of what remains of our government.  The reason they preach that the sky is falling with regards to Medicaid and Social Security is that they don't want to pay for Medicaid (the rich) and they want to loot Social Security and privatize it.



I really don't know where to begin with your reply, but I would initially like to point out that your assertions are quite disingenuous.

If you would like to reply to the articles in my post, please do - but if you choose to ignore them and place your own accusations and political agenda upon a false reply, it only reflects poorly upon yourself and your positions.

First, your opening accusation "More Austrian politics wrapped in the language of economics" is incorrect in more than one way.
1. The correct phrasing would be "More libertarian politics wrapped in the language of Austrian economics".
2. While Hummel does incorporate some Austrian positions in economics, he is not an Austrian economist, his personal economics (from his own explanation) incorporates neo-classical positions as well as others.

Regarding your "entitlements" rundown:

1. There may be trillions of dollars missing from the Pentagon and I am sure the Author shares your dislike.
2. The Author does not support state-sponsored wars (why do you phrase the question in an accusatory way?)
3. Again, you phrase your question in an accusatory way, as if the Author supports this action.
4. In which article does the Author support CDS?
5. I'm sure a $.02 National sales tax will take care of that... - /sarcasm
16  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: US Default = Rise in BTC price or fall in BTC price? on: June 07, 2011, 08:48:20 PM
I like to refer to these articles whenever this topic is raised:

http://hnn.us/blogs/entries/53544.html

http://www.econlib.org/library/Columns/y2009/Hummeltbills.html
Pages: [1]
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!