 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 »
|
I still can’t understand how the fact that FortFC creators are already experienced in working on an ordinary exchange will help them to develop a product of high quality designed for the crypto market.
Regulations come nearer. In addition, the crypto exchange would do well to learn from the fund exchanges. I hoped that we would a product designed for crypto currency which will be kinda unique. Dozens of such projects have been created a year ago. Now you can get assured that they didn’t succeed ‘cause comfortable trading is much more important for regular users than faith in blockchain ideals. Personally, I think that the fact that FortFC is experienced is an advantage. That’s why i’m going to invest in the project. I hope that your expectations will be satisfied. I decided that I’ll form my opinion about the project after the launch of a full-fledged beta version. You might make a mistake. Coin of most of exchanges cost a dime a dozen during the development stage, but then the price skyrockets and many kick themselves. Don’t want join them. |
|
|
|
I still can’t understand how the fact that FortFC creators are already experienced in working on an ordinary exchange will help them to develop a product of high quality designed for the crypto market.
Regulations come nearer. In addition, the crypto exchange would do well to learn from the fund exchanges. I hoped that we would a product designed for crypto currency which will be kinda unique. Dozens of such projects have been created a year ago. Now you can get assured that they didn’t succeed ‘cause comfortable trading is much more important for regular users than faith in blockchain ideals. Personally, I think that the fact that FortFC is experienced is an advantage. That’s why i’m going to invest in the project. |
|
|
|
|
The issue is 300 million tokens… Isn’t it too much?
|
|
|
|
How long the free use period last for ICO participants on FortFC platform?
As far as I know, it will last for 6 months. |
|
|
|
I saw on some site that they were using NAV for pricing. What’s that? I’ve never heard about it.
NAV – Net asset value. |
|
|
|
It seems to me that no one is really interested in this project so far.
It just seems to you, the level of interest is good, don’t worry about it. I just can’t see a line of investors who want to get URA tokens. Then visit the site and see that the project already has 179 investors. And these are big investors. In addition, daily market capitalization grows, it’s a sign, too. Are there any proofs? Visit the exchange where URA tokens are traded and you will get assured. |
|
|
|
It seems to me that no one is really interested in this project so far.
It just seems to you, the level of interest is good, don’t worry about it. I just can’t see a line of investors who want to get URA tokens. Then visit the site and see that the project already has 179 investors. And these are big investors. |
|
|
|
It seems to me that no one is really interested in this project so far.
It just seems to you, the level of interest is good, don’t worry about it. |
|
|
|
Hi. What is the project’s soft cap?
$5 million. It has already been reached. |
|
|
|
|
Hello. When will the soft cap reached?
|
|
|
|
Why other platforms don’t use True Random Number Generator? Maybe, it’s a scam project?
I believe that other representatives of gambling business are less interested in transparency than GG. Anyway, I’d like to learn more about the team who has created True Random Number Generator to get sure of their honesty. Information about it is provided both on the official site of the team and in the WP of the platform. There’s enough of info and even more. Isn’t GG team planning to launch a casino or slots? I’m sure that this revolution mechanism would also be useful in these areas. First, they need to create a global lottery and then think on expansion in other areas. Hurrying up will be unnecessary. |
|
|
|
Why other platforms don’t use True Random Number Generator? Maybe, it’s a scam project?
I believe that other representatives of gambling business are less interested in transparency than GG. Anyway, I’d like to learn more about the team who has created True Random Number Generator to get sure of their honesty. Information about it is provided both on the official site of the team and in the WP of the platform. There’s enough of info and even more. |
|
|
|
Why other platforms don’t use True Random Number Generator? Maybe, it’s a scam project?
I believe that other representatives of gambling business are less interested in transparency than GG. |
|
|
|
How long is the total duration of the ICO?
If my memory doesn’t fail me, it’s about 3 months. |
|
|
|
|
Hello. What amount is allocated to partnership system? As far as i understand, it will influence platform development.
|
|
|
|
I heard that Africa became the first country for holding lotteries due to language issue. Do you think that it’s rational to use such an approach?
The point is that the marketers managed to cover 85% of African population using just 15 languages. Does it turn out that the reduction of costs is the main factor? Well, then i’m ready to see the true value of effectiveness of GG method’s efficiency. Cost reduction is always a good thing, but, as for me, the key factors here are marketing effectiveness and the demand for the lotteries themselves. However, this platform is focused on mobile devices users. Do you really think that there’s stable connection? There’re problems with technologies! It seems that you don’t handle the situation and captivated by stereotypes. 90% of African population has access to mobile phones. This is one of the most fast growing world markets. In such a case, i’m sorry. However, i’d prefer the project to be launched in USA or China – this would allow to cover as big audience as possible. |
|
|
|
I heard that Africa became the first country for holding lotteries due to language issue. Do you think that it’s rational to use such an approach?
The point is that the marketers managed to cover 85% of African population using just 15 languages. Does it turn out that the reduction of costs is the main factor? Well, then i’m ready to see the true value of effectiveness of GG method’s efficiency. Cost reduction is always a good thing, but, as for me, the key factors here are marketing effectiveness and the demand for the lotteries themselves. However, this platform is focused on mobile devices users. Do you really think that there’s stable connection? There’re problems with technologies! |
|
|
|
I read an interesting opinion telling that the client base of FortFC will get at least 50 new active clients annually. It’d interesting to hear what basis such a forecast was made on. Why would investors believe in it at all?
The point is that FortFC services are already available for corporate clients on demo version. So they don’t need to pay anything to get connected to paid services. Connection will be completely free. That’s what the forecast is based on. It’s clear, but i still doubt it. 50 major brokers will get connected each year. There’re not that many of them all over the world for such an influx of clients, right? Why do you consider only brokers? Other organizations – and there’re a lot of them all over the world – are corporate clients, too. Who else can get connected to FortFC? For example, banking organizations  Banking organizations??? Seriously? Why will they need getting connected to FortFC at all? |
|
|
|
I read an interesting opinion telling that the client base of FortFC will get at least 50 new active clients annually. It’d interesting to hear what basis such a forecast was made on. Why would investors believe in it at all?
The point is that FortFC services are already available for corporate clients on demo version. So they don’t need to pay anything to get connected to paid services. Connection will be completely free. That’s what the forecast is based on. It’s clear, but i still doubt it. 50 major brokers will get connected each year. There’re not that many of them all over the world for such an influx of clients, right? Why do you consider only brokers? Other organizations – and there’re a lot of them all over the world – are corporate clients, too. Who else can get connected to FortFC? |
|
|
|
I read an interesting opinion telling that the client base of FortFC will get at least 50 new active clients annually. It’d interesting to hear what basis such a forecast was made on. Why would investors believe in it at all?
The point is that FortFC services are already available for corporate clients on demo version. So they don’t need to pay anything to get connected to paid services. Connection will be completely free. That’s what the forecast is based on. It’s clear, but i still doubt it. 50 major brokers will get connected each year. There’re not that many of them all over the world for such an influx of clients, right? |
|
|
|
|
