Bitcoin Forum
May 10, 2024, 09:14:44 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 »
1  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: A idea for the children. on: January 20, 2014, 05:29:16 AM
I am thinking that in game like x3 or gta instead of having "credits" you have to really transfer coin to buy the stuff in the game and you
get money for making missions to your wallet but that wont make the testnet bitcoin having any value.

And i am thinking that it be integrated to android games because everyone has a mobile phone
but it would work for other platform to. In the games there are
buyers and sellers for stuff that you need to go forward in the game.
Think like the pc game capitalism or the facebook game "farming" or what its name was.

Maybe make a game like Entropia universe.
2  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / A idea for the children. on: January 19, 2014, 07:11:23 PM
Hi everyone

I have been thinking about a idea.

What about to create a game with its own economy system that uses testnet bitcoins?

That way it is not real money and the games can learn about economy and how bitcoins work at the same time.
I think this could accelerate the adoption of bitcoin in our communities around the world.

I am not a developer myself. So if anyone else thinks that this would be a good idea ,,take it  Smiley

Please write what you think about the idea.
3  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: backup vs keypool on: December 31, 2013, 12:42:33 AM
Cant a solution be that:

1. You think how many transactions you will make in your lifetime.
2. You start the Bitcoin-qt client with "-keypool=(the number of transactions you think you will make)"
3. Take a cup of coffee.
4. Make a backup of your wallet file.

Or

1. Change the standard size of keypool from 100 to 100.000.
2. Make a backup of your wallet file.

4  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: My bitcoin-qt wont discover a unconfirmed transaction. on: December 14, 2013, 10:01:04 PM
I think that my client was syncing when i did the transaction. So thanks for giving me a answer to my problem, but i feel that the client should be able  to listen to new transactions and syncing up to the blockchain at the same time dont you?
5  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: My bitcoin-qt wont discover a unconfirmed transaction. on: December 07, 2013, 11:55:33 AM
No one else that is having this issue? or someone that can help us?
6  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / My bitcoin-qt wont discover a unconfirmed transaction. on: December 05, 2013, 09:43:43 PM
Hi everyone

My bitcoin-qt 0.8.5-beta on a Debian 7 wont discover a unconfirmed transaction. It wont get the transaction until it have got in to a block. I don't like that i wont see a incoming transaction until it have become confirmed.

Please tell me if you guys and girls need more info about this to help me out.
7  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Bitcoin-qt stuck for days on: November 25, 2013, 04:58:54 PM
Ǵet more free space the blockchain needs 12 Gigabytes of more.
8  Economy / Economics / Re: It's official, BTC is $500 on MtGox exactly at 5:47 AM CST on: November 18, 2013, 12:00:24 PM
Bitcoin have broken the $600 mark ,,this is crazy in short. My question is "Who is buying all the bitcoins?"
9  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Blockchain corruption during power loss? on: July 06, 2013, 02:30:49 PM
Clever programming simply cannot prevent corruption during a power loss. 

Atomic file operations would ensure that the disk is always in a valid state.  However, it doesn't seem to be a high priority for OS designers.

It is solved. The answer is: ZFS
Here is a link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ZFS
10  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Getting Coins out of testnet in a box on: June 20, 2013, 11:03:52 PM
 adb logcat ?

I started a root shell and run the command "adb logcat" and the answer was: "daemon not running. starting it on port xxxxx daemon started successfully waiting for device"
11  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Getting Coins out of testnet in a box on: June 19, 2013, 10:19:35 PM
Does anyone have a idea how i can make this work ?

The clients on my computer is bitcoin-qt 0.7.0.

I can ping between my computer to my phone and back again. I am able to get the two bitcoin-qt processes to connect to another with my 192.168.10.67 ip number that my computer have.
 

What is keypool?
12  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Getting Coins out of testnet in a box on: June 17, 2013, 04:17:13 PM
I have but it doesn't connect.

here is the conf files:

1:

Code:
# Important for testnet-in-a-box functionality:
testnet=1
irc=0
dnsseed=0
upnp=0

# Feel free to change these.
# Be careful if you decide to listen on the default testnet
# port (18333), if somebody on the main testnet
# chain connects to you then your chain will be
# over-written.
rpcuser=test
rpcpassword=123
port=19000
rpcport=19001
keypool=5


2:

Code:
# Important for testnet-in-a-box functionality:
testnet=1
irc=0
dnsseed=0
upnp=0
listen=0
connect=127.0.0.1:19000

# Feel free to change these:
rpcuser=test
rpcpassword=123
port=19010
rpcport=19011
keypool=5




And i have set the ip of my computer as the trusted ip with the port number of 19000 and then reset the blockchain so the client would get the blocks from my computer. But over the list of block in the mobile app the is one block that i can not get rid of , is that a problem ?

So what is the problem why is it not working?

Thanks in advance

13  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Getting Coins out of testnet in a box on: June 17, 2013, 03:04:10 PM
Hi i have problem.

I have two bitcoin-qt processes running and mining is working fine but i have a bitcoin testnet client i want to connect so i can transfer testnet coins to my mobile. How can i make this work?
My mobile is connected to the wireless that is the same network.



14  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: reg. Unconfirmed transaction. What now? on: May 30, 2013, 09:04:51 PM
It is very easy if the transaction is in blockchain.info then it is just to wait until it got confirmed. Thats it.
15  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: A big milestone - 2^70 hash operations on: May 13, 2013, 12:39:54 AM
But it's still probably just an estimate.

My understanding is that it may overshoot or undershoot between blocks (because it doesn't know the exact number, only the average) but the average over all these years should be very close to the real number.
And what percent is that number, from all the possible 2^256 SHA256 hashes?
2^70 / 2^256 = 2^-186 = 1.02 x 10^-56 = 1.02 * 10^-54 %
0.00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000102 %

Very small. Exponents are powerful.

Edit: fixed # of 0's

And just wondering, what happens when it reaches 100% or 2^256. And yes I agree, exponents are amazingly powerful:)

Precisely when we have done 2^255 hashes, when we have 50% left.   
16  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Boycott 0.8.2 on: May 06, 2013, 08:14:35 PM
Hi you can not transfer less than 0.001 bitcoin to be able to get in to the queue to get in to a block. So it is impossible already.
If am wrong please explain how i can transfer 0.00005395 from one of my wallet to an other ?
As it is now no one is willing to relay that transaction through the network.
17  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Transaction not getting confirmed, help! on: May 02, 2013, 08:41:35 PM
Could be based around the transaction fees.

Things with a transaction fee are given priority processing. I'm guessing they don't add anything above the minimum fees for the transaction. Meaning it gets a low priority compared to all the smaller transactions at minimum fees, as they represent a larger percentage of the total transaction.


My guess is that they didn't add ANY fee. Does that mean that transactions without any fee has the potential to be delayed substantially?

Yes I am awaiting confirmation on transaction for over 24h ( http://blockchain.info/tx/bda79bc758b7212c28f2bc5d8ad48a534ae96a870e5c94faf35754ced1444ffc ) but i know that it will go in to a block. It is just a matter of time when that will happen.   
18  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: A suggestion for the mining oligopol problem. on: April 07, 2013, 12:27:53 PM
HAHA

Yeah i know my suggestion is some radical but am i not right ?
19  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / A suggestion for the mining oligopol problem. on: April 07, 2013, 12:24:05 PM
Hi everyone

So i have seen a couple of topic about that the transference fee is to high and that the transferences is taking a very long time to get in to a block.

So a looked around a saw big mining pools that have over 2TH/sec in capacity.
As member to a mining pool you only get a peace of the reword but the person who owns the pool
get to decide if the pool is accepting non-fee transfers and how big the block is going to be and they are collecting the transfers fees.

If you are new to bitcoin and want to be a miner you have to pay big bucks to get high-end gpu:s and even then you have to get into a pool to get even a little bitcoins.

So my suggestion is to remove the possible to make a mining pools and make so it is only possible to mine with cpu:s.

Now everyone can be a miner and decide if there are going to bee non-fee transfers in the blockchain or not, and how big the blocks can be.
It will be more competition between the miners and that will benefit the bitcoin network.

What do you guys think?
20  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: I say it again: REDUCE THE FEES! on: April 03, 2013, 03:32:10 PM
Look here

One way to lower the fees is to become a miner yourself.
Then you can set to accept no-fee transactions and create blocks that are several megabytes big if you like.
Pages: [1] 2 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!