Bitcoin Forum
July 29, 2021, 04:58:27 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.21.1 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 »
1  Economy / Invites & Accounts / Re: ***Netflix Premium Account Trial*** on: September 23, 2020, 01:11:40 AM
And his is netflix waveban man!. 90% of the trial accounts got ban

trial accounts aren't just randomly banned its what ever vcc or method you're using.

1.9$ with 90% ban rate that last about 3days each, that leaves people paying an avg of 19$ for a full month. (more then the cost to just pay for a sub)


you can get hacked accounts for around 3.5$ that are almost never banned and with warranties any where you look, just google it and within 30secs you will find reputable sellers with thousands of transactions accepting any payment method.  

and even that isnt a good value
you can go to any store, buy a western union debit card or most others for 4$ fee+load 1$, pay 5$ and get netflix,hulu,spotify,disney+ etc all at once with 0risk of being scammed or banned.  or better yet, signup to the hundreds of gpt sites like swagbucks for example and get paid 20$-30$ for joining all the trial offers. you actually get paid to take free accounts why would anyone deal with op


.
2  Economy / Games and rounds / Re: BitGame.online giveaway | Sign up and get 15 Free Spins on: October 18, 2019, 04:47:53 PM
username: love2spade
3  Economy / Gambling / Re: TPLAY token is used in crypto-casino on: July 22, 2019, 01:06:55 PM
first off they need more then a cell number for a KYC.

second i'm definitely not going to share personal info esp my phone number just for a bonus used to test the site. doesn't that defeat the purpose of even testing it to see if you wanna give it a go.
if kyc was required they could request it during withdrawal.

3rd these shitty sites should stop operating at all if kyc is required. if i wanted to do that i would play a real money regulated casino and not some unknown site using a 3 month old forum account.

4th fairplay.io is named after fairplay.com which has been operating since 2002




This is insane ffs
all it takes is using a token with a marketcap around the same as all of the other shitcoins
and offering it to peoples "accounts" so they never have control of the coins i don't actually possess
then they will give me all the personal information that i ask for which is apparently not even the info required to file a kyc

4  Economy / Games and rounds / Re: Stake.com $250 giveaway #3! on: July 14, 2019, 05:02:12 AM
love2spade
6999
5  Economy / Games and rounds / Re: Stake.com $250 giveaway #3! on: July 13, 2019, 12:35:44 AM
love2spade
7175
6  Economy / Games and rounds / Re: SwcPoker.eu ♣ Weekly Freeroll ♣ .01 Bitcoin on: July 12, 2019, 10:04:22 AM
was that the last freeroll?
7  Economy / Games and rounds / Re: SwcPoker.eu ♣ Weekly Freeroll ♣ .01 Bitcoin on: July 07, 2019, 07:03:03 PM
btckingfqsd and wadn152 joined and wasn't on the list
8  Economy / Games and rounds / Re: Ok, here's a 1BTC puzzle. on: July 07, 2019, 12:15:30 AM
In general, so, there is some kind of healthy logic! all that is connected with this riddle. a ton of information. which I read and rechecked in 2 weeks! on different topics! It is not even clear how a private key is obtained. and each of the probable answers has to be transferred through different systems and thus you get a different key, respectively !!! Not very informative (Given) this question! Abstract! 8 words 32 characters without special ... the digit is not a special character but it is not specified that it can be used! Generally from where do I know that this is not just the authorís backup wallet, from where he will withdraw this amount on a rainy day. Does a private key have any relation to the task at all? )))) Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Huh




After looking at watashi's post they do seem like the same person. her post before this thread was about reversing something multiple ways until they all reach the same point. maybe its related to that


and the 2nd post to this thread shows a possible way to decrypt a piece of it.  so maybe you need to follow the steps done to decrypt that for the entire message.


Also on the first page she provides a solution on how to get the key.


i'm not a 100% sure they're the same person but assuming it is you would have alot of information to go on.
9  Economy / Gambling / Re: Nitrodice.com | Bitcoins Dice Site + Dogecoins Giveaway on: July 05, 2019, 02:20:33 AM
yeah this is obv a scam.
admin didn't payout in the past
made a new forum account
offering more then he owns for payouts
10  Economy / Games and rounds / Re: SwcPoker.eu ♣ Weekly Freeroll ♣ .01 Bitcoin on: June 30, 2019, 03:42:49 PM
kind of expected 50+ signups because someone leaked the pw, so far i don't see anyone thats not on the list:) gl everyone
11  Economy / Games and rounds / Re: CyberDice BTC GiveAway | Sign-up and get 20 000 Satoshi! 💥🎲 on: June 26, 2019, 01:51:04 PM
The next bonuses have been sent to all who applied and met our rules  Smiley



lois-229

We can't send you an e-mail with the code. I'll PM you - please allow the "newbies" to send you a message in the settings.


idk if this is only for new accounts or what.
i used my onehash account.
i didn't get any email.

Yes, it's for new accounts. If you have the OneHash account already, you can use it to check CyberDice Smiley

sorry i misunderstood before and lost track of this thread, i enabled messages from newbies
12  Economy / Games and rounds / Re: SwcPoker.eu ♣ Weekly Freeroll ♣ .01 Bitcoin on: June 25, 2019, 06:59:58 PM
Btctalk name: tortic25
Btctalk URL: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=841001
Rank: FullMember
Current post count: 237
Swc Username : ancilvtwo
13  Economy / Games and rounds / Re: 0.05 BTC Giveaway - Bitcoin2x1 Celebration! on: June 25, 2019, 06:48:53 PM
Warning: OP is promoting a ponzi site!

i will PM you for your Bitcoin address to receive the btc giveaway.
As a Newbie, you can only send 2 PMs per day.

Can you share the solution to 0.01 BTC Simple BTC Puzzle?


Half of the text in his thread is an exact match to https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5096267.0
Pretty sure he copy/pasted it and added random hints/ ("coooode")

all of his 8post are promoting this ponzi
and the only people posting in his threads are accounts made the same day his was created.


14  Economy / Games and rounds / Re: Ok, here's a 1BTC puzzle. on: June 25, 2019, 04:01:42 PM
Back here after a few weeks, and notice one thing.

Why Op uses NatashaOtomoski instead of Satoshi Nakamoto?

Does it increase the difficulty of the question? No.

I think a part of the key needs to be anagrammed
The entire question has 37 characters so i don't think anagram work here

That is not my point.

Since NatashaOtomoski is a clear anagram of Satoshi Nakamoto, the only clear question is whey he used it?

The answer could be, you need to use the same algorithm on the solution.

posted that awhile back
https://bitcoinexchangeguide.com/nakamoto-family-foundation-book-gets-stylometry-test/
the 21Teeth could refer to the book that came out with 21pages also using a cryptogram  so maybe the values given to each letter used to decipher the book title (in the link)
could be used to crack this.

NatashaOtomoski=Satoshi Nakamoto
both mentioning 21
and both using a cryptogram

15  Economy / Goods / Re: selling my art piece 0,00555 BTC on: June 25, 2019, 01:11:44 PM
are those 3 cigarette burns? did you fall asleep while making it? or intentionally?
16  Economy / Services / Re: Windice.io Signature Campaign(4 open slots) on: June 25, 2019, 01:11:33 AM
Btctalk name   tortic25
Link to profile  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=841001
Rank Full Member
Current post count  227
Windice username riskydingo72 
Wear appropriate signature Yes  (changed the url to my affiliate url)
Wear avatar Yes



Most of my post are in the gambling section, and with incentive ill make the weekly requirement every week, i also think most of my older post are on topic and meet the requirements but if i'm accepted i will try to make higher quality post too.


reapplying
17  Economy / Services / Re: Windice.io Signature Campaign(FULL)(Rate Changing Friday) on: June 16, 2019, 08:09:22 AM
Btctalk name   tortic25
Link to profile  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=841001
Rank Full Member
Current post count  227
Windice username riskydingo72 
Wear appropriate signature Yes  (changed the url to my affiliate url)
Wear avatar Yes



Most of my post are in the gambling section, and with incentive ill make the weekly requirement every week, i also think most of my older post are on topic and meet the requirements but if i'm accepted i will try to make higher quality post too.


reapplying
18  Economy / Gambling / Re: BEST CRYPTO POKER - $15K+ COMPETITIONS | 200% BONUSES | VERIFIED RNG CERTIFICATE on: June 13, 2019, 10:47:55 AM
This is a link to a post containing excerpts of the emails:
https://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/28/internet-poker/cryptopokerclub-seizing-funds-deposits-not-safe-1745287/

Please look through it and then tell me what you think. If the details in the video were hard for you to view, you should state that when replying - since it does contain all the correspondence with the site. Giving an opinion without knowing any of the details is a bit premature.

The site did not even claim that the same ip was used.



I still can't see the "email" but assuming everything was their exact response



""with identical playing stats""
this is possible esp since they're basing it off only 3000 hands


""""we have no choice but to ban the accounts regardless of what may or may not be the case. We have very strict rules on this to preserve integrity. This is not the first or last time we will see such cases. Our reaction will always be the same. This will be our last response on this query."""

This is them admitting they may or may not have made the correct decision, and refusing to investigate it further with 16000$ on the line.
This is probably the only thing that matters

But this is still just me making assumptions, i can't verify they sent it or that if they did send it, it's exactly how they put it.

Aside from that, i see chazley made a post saying they're shady.
someone i respect and have a history with, pretty sure hes trusted by alot of people here too so that helps.

If you truly want to expose this site here's the proof i think you will need to provide.
1:A clear image of the email with the sender.

2:If you used a hud or have your hand history files those would help. they're accusing you of  similar play styles which isn't how reviewing for collusion works
You said a majority of those hands weren't played at the same tables, and collusion depends on if you played against each other or with "making folds/raises" that players wouldn't normally make otherwise.
It would help to see how many of those 3,000hands where played together, and a copy of both of your histories for those hands played together "so we could see both of your hole cards"

3: like the post on the other thread said "letters from ISP that confirms your story about the IP sharing" or activity logs to confirm that those ips where even showing the same or not and if the patterns matchup.
isp confirmation would be better then having the activity log, but if you're unable to get their cooperation i think there's a few different ways to get the activity log that could help you out.

4: leave this thread and create a scam accusation thread so the proof you provide won't be scattered in the 17pages here, and so others can share their proof that will further support your claims.



19  Economy / Gambling / Re: BEST CRYPTO POKER - $15K+ COMPETITIONS | 200% BONUSES | VERIFIED RNG CERTIFICATE on: June 13, 2019, 09:31:26 AM
Quote


because pokerstars has a networth of 4.8billion you can't really compare their security with this sites
wpn is shady to begin with and i doubt they care as long as youre generating rake and not abusing promos, if that's not good enough wpn has wrongly accuses players, so has almost every other gambling based business.
these security systems aren't perfect, but imo i feel better about the site knowing they take security seriously.

You also don't need to be using the same ip for collusion, ((like you said you wasn't))
And they didn't randomly ban just you 2, that happen to know each other, you most likely got reported by players (not that hard to spot) and they reviewed your hand history.
Your post only makes you look more guilty with these claims
You most likely was cheating and now you're both complaining because your funds was frozen.

I wonder why you're assuming the site was ok?
If you watch the video, no handhistories were reviewed and there were a lot of signs that point towards the two players not colluding, but the site did not care, their decision was final and they refused to review further facts.
There were also simply put not enough hands to establish the claims the site made, any poker player would know this but the site's security team do not understand poker.

I feel like at this point this site is more dangerous than the colluders themselves, just confiscating money based on correlations without proof, and refusing to review. Has the money confiscated been redistributed to players? I would bet a lot that the site is keeping all of it.

You're right i am making assumptions. The video was unreadable even at 1080p "atleast for me" so the only thing both of you have provided that i can go on is you claiming you didn't use the same ip
And if that's true it's a fact, if they where randomly banning to steal funds it wouldn't be just you 2 here
And since you both admit to being "friends" it's not a coincidence. there's only one other way they found 2 people connected and that's by being reported and investigated.
You say that they didn't review your hand history, but the video looked like it was basing everything off of a conversation with support, and ive never seen any support reveal their investigation method only the conclusion which i can only assume is what you got from that conversation "so i don't know how you're claiming your history wasn't reviewed" because i doubt they would tell you if they did or didn't.


Quote
You also don't need to be using the same ip for collusion, ((like you said you wasn't))
And they didn't randomly ban just you 2, that happen to know each other, you most likely got reported by players (not that hard to spot) and they reviewed your hand history.
Your post only makes you look more guilty with these claims
You most likely was cheating and now you're both complaining because your funds was frozen.

You post only makes you look more like a casino rep.

Seriously... you can't take someone to court, decide he's guilty, and then when he refutes things you say respond with "that only makes you look more guilty".

What's going on here is very kafkaesque and very disturbing and if you weren't a casino rep I'd be surprised you don't see that.



And it does make you look more guilty because like i said above if you where using the same ip, there would be room for confusion/mistakes
I never decided you where guilty or even said you where, i said you most likely are.

this is a forum not a courtroom, honestly this is worse then your comparison of this site with pokerstars.

i have seen countless post where cheaters got caught and cried because there funds was frozen, i haven't seen any where viable proof was actually provided.

Not me or any other forum user here has the facts to say for certain you where cheating, theres too much missing.

your story relies on alot of coincidences being true and that's why "i may look like a rep" because i'm not going to side with someone whos """likely""" a cheater scamming other players while harming this sites rep.
"btw i haven't even played here before" that's why i was browsing this thread, to decide.  My current opinion is unbiased and if you post any viable proof that proves you're innocent then ill be behind you.




20  Economy / Gambling / Re: BEST CRYPTO POKER - $15K+ COMPETITIONS | 200% BONUSES | VERIFIED RNG CERTIFICATE on: June 12, 2019, 08:31:11 PM
Crypto Poker Club seized two players' poker balances and cited collusion as the reason.

Here is a video about the situation including the emails back and forth
https://youtu.be/S_Fjvgf4qhg

The emails from the site seem brutally unfair to me. As the video states, it feels like something either very shady or very stupid is going on here.

Is there a Crypto Poker Club representative who would like to comment?



Hmm, they don't seem that unfair to me, if he was really caught using the same IP and sitting at the same tables at the same time, etc, it looks really guilty to me, of course there is no way for us to know whether that's the case or not unless the casino decides to show proof or the user in question has some counter evidence.

hi
im uri's friend and the other party accused of gaining an unfair edge.
so just to make sure, we are two separate people, were living tens of kilometers apart from each other, so either they have a very faulty ip identification system or something shady is going on.
uri and myself we have played most of our sessions apart from each other.
and even if the claim of same ip and same time of play are correct (which they are not!!!) how is that a proof of any wrongdoing other than playing at the same location at the same time?
we have often played on numerous networks like pokerstars or winning poker network which are far bigger and have far superior security system and have never been accused of any wrongdoing.


because pokerstars has a networth of 4.8billion you can't really compare their security with this sites
wpn is shady to begin with and i doubt they care as long as youre generating rake and not abusing promos, if that's not good enough wpn has wrongly accuses players, so has almost every other gambling based business.
these security systems aren't perfect, but imo i feel better about the site knowing they take security seriously.

You also don't need to be using the same ip for collusion, ((like you said you wasn't))
And they didn't randomly ban just you 2, that happen to know each other, you most likely got reported by players (not that hard to spot) and they reviewed your hand history.
Your post only makes you look more guilty with these claims
You most likely was cheating and now you're both complaining because your funds was frozen.
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!