Bitcoin Forum
April 19, 2024, 11:07:16 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 [33] 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 »
641  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Idea for a paid, anonymous api service. on: April 25, 2012, 08:52:59 AM
so what is it? a proxy service or something more?

it's nothing but an idea at the moment, but take blockexplorer just as an example.

they provide an api to get various info, such as the 'received' amount of an address:

http://blockexplorer.com/q/getreceivedbyaddress/1A8JiWcwvpY7tAopUkSnGuEYHmzGYfZPiq

however, they also ask people not to query it too often, because of server resources, etc.

if such a service were paid for, it could help pay for server resources/profit for the api developer.

eg. http://blockexplorer.com/q/getreceivedbyaddress/1A8JiWcwvpY7tAopUkSnGuEYHmzGYfZPiq?payment_key=5fji23892u3dfj389kfjw8jij23fj2ifj2323f829jf82j3fffji

if payment_key is invalid or doesn't contain enough bitcoins, die(); else sweep the key and output the requested info.

there are millions of api's out there... some that you have to sign up for and pay a monthly subscription fee, some that currently have no subscription option but limit the number of requests.


pretty much any api you can think of could use this system... off the top of my head, let's say there's an api for a 'daily joke', where each joke costs 0.00001 btc, or a certain fx chartist might charge 0.01 per up/down/hold prediction.


edit: also a server could easily provide binary data for a given request, eg: http://pornsite/hotvideo.mp4?payment_key=5fji23892u3dfj389kfjw8jij23fj2ifj2323f829jf82j3fffji



Actually I like the model where you deposit bitcoins to the server, and use them more. It can still be fairly anonymous - eg. your first bitcoin deposit creates your account, then later you can do requests by singing the request with your bitcoin public key you made the first bitcoin transaction.

Creating lots of these microtransactions is not that sensible, since there will be transaction fees in the future.
642  Economy / Services / Re: [4BTC] Assemble a PirateBox for me and send it to me on: April 24, 2012, 02:16:15 PM
Anyone willing to create more of these? I would be interested to buy also, too lazy to assemble it myself Cheesy

Maybe if someone can produce lots of these, he can sell them on bitmit.net and turn profit Cheesy
643  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: VP of Amex asked about Bitcoin - "No comment, next question" on: April 23, 2012, 08:04:48 PM
Anyone at the conference? In twitter, someone said that there was lot of bitcoin-startup pitches. Anyone can give any details?

https://twitter.com/#!/search/%23futureofmoney

http://bitcoincard.org/ (really cool, but seems like vapourware...)
644  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: Tutorial: creating a bitcoin instawallet clone with python and django on: April 23, 2012, 06:27:25 PM
I just had an idea. Make an instawallet with a "Double or Nothing" button. Just a huge irresistible button that either doubles your balance or takes it all. Take a 1% or whatever fee by giving only 49.5% odds. Have to publish the max amount you can handle covering, maybe make it dynamic. If someone actually wants to do this I could probably put up some cash.

Well, creating a gambling site with django_bitcoin is trivial. It could be of course an anonymous gambling site as well - just deposit your bitcoins to this address, and then you have gambling functionalities there.

eg. "double or nothing" pseudocode:

Code:
import random
from django_bitcoin import Wallet

def double_or_nothing(request, uuid):
    main_wallet=Wallet.objects.get(id=1) # the main wallet, where the site's bitcoins are kept
    user_wallet=Wallet.objects.get(uuid=uuid)
    if random.random()<0.49:
         main_wallet.send_to_wallet(user_wallet, user_wallet.total_balance())
    else:
         user_wallet.send_to_wallet(main_wallet, user_wallet.total_balance())

I just wrote the code directly here, so perhaps it doesn't work Cheesy But anyway, the basic idea is very simple. Then of course, if you want to implement more complex gambling functionalities, it is easy.

I'm not implementing this, since I think it doesn't fit well with wallet... But the library itself could be used as well for gambling sites, or almost anything.
645  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: [ANN] Automatic MtGox Investing with BitcoinBuilder.com on: April 23, 2012, 10:12:17 AM
Any news about this service? Any new features in planning?
646  Economy / Trading Discussion / Re: Flexcoin Payouts. on: April 23, 2012, 07:16:31 AM
is Flexcoin a safe way to hold bitcoin?

Probably as safe as every other web-based wallet: you are trusting the site owner, and the security he/she can provide. And also he/she can run anytime with your money.
647  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Way to get an iPhone BTC app into the App Store on: April 22, 2012, 05:51:51 AM
I'm thinking it would be better just to have a website designed for the small displays of mobile devices (like google or yahoo have). Then you don't need Apple approval and the mobile version would work on both iOS devices and Android devices. I guess this also beg the question of whether you'd prefer to have some BTC actually on the mobile device or just keep some on an exchange or online wallet and then access that site through the mobile device.

I am already doing this with easywallet.org - pretty fast to get started with iPhone/Android devices. The UI for mobile isn't that great yet, hopefully I will have some time in the future to improve it.
648  Economy / Service Announcements / Re: [ANN] Easywallet.org - web based wallet, iPhone/Android clients with QR Codes on: April 21, 2012, 10:22:28 AM
Google Goggles on Android 2.3

I think it might have something to do with starting the URL off with 'http:/', one slash instead of two.

Oh now I spotted the error, so it was with the QR code URL... Going to fix it ASAP.

Edit: fixed now.
649  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Smartphones & Bitcoin on: April 20, 2012, 09:16:37 AM
If FriendlyPay uses instawallet, it probably doesn't have its own crypto module. It is just a front-end to instawallet. And it doesn't allow sending.
It does allow sending coins, without the need of an external QR code reader Smiley

Well, I misunderstood the app description (http://itunes.apple.com/de/app/friendlypay/id473941791?mt=8)

Perhaps they should advertise the sending functionality a little better, because if you read the test you understand from it that the app is only for receiving...
650  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Smartphones & Bitcoin on: April 20, 2012, 09:02:19 AM
ok, I did not know about Bitpak.

FriendlyPay uses Instawallet, according to their website.
does that mean it runs javascript from the web, or does it have its own crypto module?


I do not recommend BitPak to anyone - while I appreciate that people are developing these clients, people are reporting block chain download times like 2 weeks with BitPak. Recommending it is a surefire way to get people to hate bitcoin.

If FriendlyPay uses instawallet, it probably doesn't have its own crypto module. It is just a front-end to instawallet. And it doesn't allow sending.

Have to advertise my own service easywallet.org here - if you add it as a bookmark to your iPhone & install the QR Code scanner app (http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/barcodes-scanner/id417257150?mt=8), you can send bitcoins back and forth using QR codes. Almost like a native app.

And then there is blockchain.info app, which I haven't tested extensively yet.
651  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Smartphones & Bitcoin on: April 20, 2012, 07:21:47 AM
Couldn't say that better. At the very least get android over the iphone. Still though. My preference is WebOS-->Android-->Wp7-->Apple

I don't really get why the hate. In my experience, Apple devices have always had superior usage time compared to other mobiles. Of course the software is locked etc.

But really, windows phone? You really recommend that over Apple? OK, I think you have something personal against apple devices... Cheesy
652  Economy / Service Announcements / Re: [ANN] Easywallet.org - web based wallet, iPhone/Android clients with QR Codes on: April 20, 2012, 07:18:17 AM
Any reason http://www.easywallet.org shouldn't either resolve or get a redirect if it needs to be http://easywallet.org?

Thanks, just noticed this problem today. Will try to fix it ASAP.

I'd love for the addresses to come 'used' so that they have firstbits already. And of course then you could display the firstbits.

Sorry, I'm not going to implement that. I think the anonymity might be in danger if I implement something like this. And also it would be lots of work, and I don't personally see the benefits. Thanks for the feedback anyway Smiley

Edit: to clarify, my philosophy with bitcoin is that it should be as cash-like, anonymous as possible. This means one address for one use, etc. Firstbits doesn't go well with that philosophy.

Like that it's mobile friendly, but scanner bounces the QR code to a Google search for the URL. Might want to fix that when it goes gold.

How do you reproduce that error? What scanner app did you use? What phone/model etc? That sounds pretty dangerous...
653  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Smartphones & Bitcoin on: April 19, 2012, 03:41:44 PM
As to "cheap hardware"... you get what you pay for.  If you buy a £99 ZTE Blade, then you can't really complain that it's not as good as a Samsung Galaxy or a HTC One.

Sorry I didn't specify earlier, I have HTC Desire. It cost something like 500 euros when I bought it maybe 1,5 years ago, and I think it is crappier than iPhone 3GS.

However of course things have progressed since then. I haven't tried out Samsung Galaxy S2. However I'm pretty sceptical that it has better user experience than iPhone 4S. I have seen some, being used by my friends.
654  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Smartphones & Bitcoin on: April 19, 2012, 03:02:36 PM
I use both iPhone and Android, because I have been developing for both platforms.

I would say that android devices actually suck more from user perspective. The software is often buggy, and the device hardware seems cheap. However it is more open than iPhone, and you have more bitcoin software etc.

iPhone offers superior user experience IMHO, however it is more closed platform.
655  Bitcoin / Wallet software / Re: BitPak - The Bitcoin Wallet for iOS on: April 18, 2012, 12:14:47 PM
Blockchain.info's app is native and works amazingly and is now on the app store.  I've been using it on my 4S and been really liking it, plus it is free!

According to this it is only available for jailbroken devices: https://blockchain.info/wallet/iphone-app (in the real app store there is only limited app without the send/receive functionality)

I will try it out when I have time to jailbreak my iPhone...
656  Bitcoin / Wallet software / Re: BitPak - The Bitcoin Wallet for iOS on: April 17, 2012, 10:09:54 AM

It's also easily possible to to x with device y, just install kernel u with options v and w enable (be sure to disable z).

I have some iFriends, telling them to install more than one thing per time we meet is prohibitive.


Well, as I have guided some people to use easywallet.org, the "installation process" usually takes just 1-2 minutes.

- open safari and go to easywallet.org
- add bookmark to home screen
- open safari again, click the app download link
- install the app
- click the easywallet.org app icon, and you are ready to go

I will add more detailed instructions & make this easier in the future.
657  Bitcoin / Wallet software / Re: BitPak - The Bitcoin Wallet for iOS on: April 16, 2012, 03:33:29 PM

question is: can you scan a qr-code to send someone money on the go this way?


Technically it is possible, and I have demonstrated this with my easywallet.org web-based bitcoin wallet. QR code scanning works easily with iPhone and Android. You just need to install specific QR code scanners (free zxing ones). Hopefully more web wallets will implement this in the future.
658  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Random Exchange Questions on: April 15, 2012, 10:51:02 AM
I dont think it would be that simple.. mtgox sets prices and controls the majority of the market... the majority of the market uses mtgox to set btc->usd prices

It is pretty trivial to code a fail-back mechanism to your code, which uses automatically alternative exchange rate if one isn't available.

If you are a merchant and setting up a bitcoin web shop, you can fro example have a process, where you first take the rate from bitcoincharts.com (which is aggregate from all exchanges), first fallback is mtgoxUSD, second fallback is intersangoEUR etc...

Of course mtgox takedown would hit the bitcoin market hard, but it is already possible to code your systems in a way that is not depandant on any single exchange.
659  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Random Exchange Questions on: April 15, 2012, 09:30:35 AM
No. bitcoins would still exist, however of course they would not be nearly as useful. People would be trading bitcoins using p2p methods, such as cash exchanges, decentralized exchanges using bank transfers, bitcoin-otc etc...

I highly suspect that taking all the bitcoin exchanges down will ever succeed. Maybe single ones, but that is excepted. After all, there are already numerous bitcoin exchanges operating in different jursidictions. And there are no laws related to bitcoins, so it is highly questionable if goverments can organize any kind of international cooperation to shut down btc exchanges.
660  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Current E-Wallets? on: April 14, 2012, 09:53:01 AM
Looks nice Smiley Here are a couple of suggestions for the UI:
- Find a way to add the fee automatically (i.e., I don't need to subtract 0.002 when I want to withdraw everything)
- Add a label to the checkboxes in 'Send Payment': address and amount.


Thanks for the feedback.

For the first suggestion, I will probably add "Send all!" button, next to the Send button... However I'll think about it a bit, if I find a way to do it which doesn't add clutter to the UI.

For the second, there should be labels already (grey texts in the input boxes). Like you see below. Do you see those labels in your browser? If not, what browser are you using?

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 [33] 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!