Maybe he should offer you a refund and those who have IPO's that want to stay can stay and benefit from the cheaper coins. That would work for me as an IPO

Because he forked it himself and soloed the one block - total bullshit

Did you delete the prior QT Folders?

Absolutely Agreed! You will note from my post history that I have raised the issue of lack of communication for some time. What prompted my response to Sparky was the statement as fact that Zach gives zero fucks now. We all need to keep on the topic of how the almost complete absence of direct communications with the bondholders is unacceptable. Communication is a process - not an event.

Not sure why you are suggesting that I have said LRM is sustainable by asking for less FUD. Perhaps somehow requesting no more FUD is FUD in your perception..... I'll leave you to the results of your own perspective.

Sparky stated something to the effect that Zach "does not give a fuck anymore". I have no proof that he does or does not other than the continued dividends. I will await evidence prior to capitulating to despair. If it is your preference to capitulate now then sell your bonds and move on.

As of this writing I note that neither you nor Sparky have bonds posted for sale - perhaps this is proof that you prefer to rant rather than walk. Rant away..... I shall respond no more.

Thanks for stepping up and verifying..... I respect that you are upset. Its your assertion Zach doesn't give a shit anymore that I have a problem with. I am very confident that is not the case and this confidence is not solely due to my natural tendency to pollyannish blind optimistic Canadian nicety. Bargraphics, grnbrg and others are directly involved and this supports my confidence and patience. What I, like you, do not have patience for is an utter lack of communication of any kind. In the absence of information it is normal to assume..... I chose to assume glass half full so far.

A statement that Zach doesnt care anymore is FUD..... no more FUD please - for your own sake more than mine based on your holdings.

OK "Sparky" since you brought it up - post a signed message in this forum from the account that holds your bonds or STFU. You may notice that your tone is not mirrored here and is not appreciated. Keep it civil.

Perhaps he is too busy setting up all the gear? One can only hope. Posting a tweet or two would be sufficient to placate the underwhelmed amongst us. I know that's grnbrg's "job". But, seriously, what is up with that? Marc Andreesen is busy. Look at his twitter feed. A Rat that Tweets would go a long ways. We don't need a blow by blow, just the odd - "Still alive, plan is unfolding, timing is ....?"

+many many -

You guys need to step back and reassess the approach to ensure the best business outcome. I am an IPO holder and am fine to wait a few more days to get it right

No going back now..... due to the fact that scrypt-n requires a RAM upgrade on all my rigs I will not be mining. Good thing I got in on the IPO

I agree - better to get onto one of the more "recognizable" or established altcoin exchanges such as bter, cryptsy or mcxnow from the get go rather than just anyone who will take you. Still, it should not be left more than a day or two as there is a marketing component to being on an exchange. The coin is not intended to be solely traded for GPU's and will need to find some form of wider market for price discovery.

The dev's will also need to have a channel for GPC to BTC to fiat in order to be able to establish their exchange rates for online sales of GPU's using their coin.

This is going to be very interesting to watch

Please put a link to your Bitcointalk OP on your website with twitter feed and FB links as well.

Perhaps you would like to consider adding a big headline to the website with a countdown timer for the launch of the coin

When the coin launches and you send them your wallet address - tomorrow - read OP and website

Now, for an exchange or two......

Cutting hashpower in half may only be an issue for the network in terms of processing transactions but not likely from what I can gather. Whether it is SHA3, scrypt or scrypt-n, your share from mining will simply be a result of your % of the total network hashrate. Of course, these results vary in the short term by pool "luck". But long term it should be a constant rate.

If the premine is scrypt and the launch is scrypt-n will this create an issue for the premined coins?

IPO # 212 here - really not sure about the scrypt-n implementation and am hopeful the launch has all necessary DL's for mining to start smoothly. From what I have observed a critical success factor for a coin is a good launch and marketing - lots of effective marketing. You seem to have garnered some goodwill for the IPO based on a novel approach and concept - including your effective communications and transparency with the LLC etc. Now, you will need to be very purposeful in regards to conserving that momentum by executing nearly flawlessly on the launch and by communicating and correcting effectively through any hiccups.

This business model could scale in some very interesting ways if you can secure sufficient volume to become a direct distributor and gain pricing leverage in the marketplace. The issue is that margins in tech are razor thin so you will need to keep your overhead super low. Areas for growth would be pre configured rigs, bespoke GPU mines, accessories such as USB risers but this should all come after you have nailed the first level of scope

USPS to Canada is good

Just jumped over to you - great pool. Moria is down in the USA tho

OP clearly stated 0.16% premine  - that is 192,000 or 1271 blocks - so it did not happen..... but - I know math is hard for trolls