Miner is just reporting it wrong locally. The 260Kh/s you're seeing is just 260H/s

I had the same problem.

Depends on how much you had mined 

I'm trying to reset my password to the pool now to cash out. Looks like the reset email never came. Perhaps due to the pool going down.

Judge Dredd is not pleased by this. niktitan132, refund the btc or you'll be making the biggest mistake of your life. Perhaps the last.

disclaimer: I did not invest a single satoshi in this dumpster fire

Yeah don't know what was up with that. Thought I copied and pasted the full thing the first time. Either way, the question is I wonder if the spreadsheet will be updated to reflect a change in rank.

Che is no hero. He is not the law. I am the law.

So now that I'm a full member I'm guessing I can't change my sig and receive more stakes?

Good point but at $5+ a piece I think I'll wait... Should have just rented servers from day 1 like everyone else. Or however the hell they're getting all this hashing power. I think the price of XZC can go higher in time but not without a huge dump occurring first. The current price is not sustainable.

I had the same issue on a 2008 R2 server earlier. Solution was - don't use that server. Mining it on some 2012 servers right now instead. How am I making diddly squat with over 100 cores mining? Probably because windows, and botnets.

I think they might be fucking with the wrong pool operator.

Sure seems like it. Must be a few botnets or someone not scared to spend money on a ton of VPSs. I've had almost 100 cores slamming this and I'm projected to make something like 1.5 to 2 XZC today...

How is it that a 64 core server is reporting the same speed pool side as an underpowered i5?

However locally the server is reporting ~250Kh/s (wrong) and the i5 is showing 0.01Khs while mining with the same miner

Site seems smooth, but no blocks found yet.

Any idea on this anyone? Weird thing is my i5 computers report correctly locally, or somewhat lower on the local side but higher on the pool side. This server is doing the opposite, reporting high speeds locally using the miner but a fraction of that on the pool.

I have a server with 64 cores reporting ~250 to 300KHs locally but on Suprnova it's only showing ~0.2KH/s

Running it the same as my other workers. Don't know why there's a discrepancy on this one. Probably because Server 2012.

Is there a compiled version of cpuminer for Windows that supports this? Links for me aren't working.

" unknown algo parameter 'lyra2rev2' "

I'm getting a time-out when entering my credentials to log in. Tried on multiple browsers. It was working the other day but has seemed flaky the past few.

Edit: it just worked on Microsoft Edge.... of all the browsers lol

Is anyone else having trouble viewing the pool page or connecting to the pool or is it just me?

Having some connection issues here. Webpage for the pool esppool.sytes.net is flaky and new stratum connections are not being accepted.

edit - The moment I say that it is now accepting new stratum connections.

Might be good to just delete the translation offer so the neg trust is removed.