If I will be analyzing this one, the problem here is that we know how the google search results works and mind that google search only put the first top answers based on the number of tags that the Internet has given.

By that said if it was not been manipulated then it is an obvious answer that the algo of google only gets the answer from different articles especially the more traffic or influenced ones. Then I can conclude that it is on the 50-50 basis for being biased.

You can't put him to jail lol currently he is the world's most powerful human. He has always been known for eliminating a lot of people specially his opponents and the corruption of his team is also rampant.

The only thing the russians do is to wait for him to die lol

Yes that is the reality. Government has been censoring history and has been doing that to preveng conflicts in that case that is really unfair when we do talk about our freedom of speech. But in my place people now always has a say about politics and were never arrested maybe because we might be influenced by the US culture and has been practicing democracy

You have good points there but I have to point out some points also that I am currently thinking.


What certain bad contents are you talking about and how google do categorize it. As far as I know they only disallow shady contents that contains viruses or pornographic which are not suitable for all ages.


Just like google, of course Facebook has to monitor contents. You also have to understand that just like any other companies they have to follow certain rules that abides the law. You can't just expect someone posting a dead people or someone going for a live show fully naked (as I have pointed out those type of contents are not for all ages and is really necessary to filter out). Social media is being highly used for fake news and that is making the platform hazardous to its users.



Ahm I am not sure yes it is still really existing in some work types. and I highly disagree on this habit from our society.

In connection to your theory, I am also thinking that OP might have other accounts where should the bought merits will be handed out. If that is the case then it will harder for us to trace the said suspected transactions


Or this might be the case (OP isn't aware of what he/she is been doing)

I don't think so, if I am not mistaken from what the article says. It was the government or might be a company that is highly governed by the chinese authority who is responsible for the said act.

Upon Looking this picture it is a clear and obvious message that this kids wanted to feed up to those who were in power. That everyone has the right to do what they want as long as it abides the laws that can't harm humanities.

Then don't invest. Do you really understand the risk about investing? or you only know how to convert a fact quote into a retarded type of meme?  


WTF are you actually saying? investing is a type of throwing money in the trash seriously? oh wait I forgot your a pro

There is nothing wrong about it. If you were an ordinary investor then just always apply the basic rule to invest only what you can afford to lose. The idea is actually good but it doesnt mean you have to follow it. Especially if you were looking for a quick profit then thats the time in which you have to strategies your entry point

How to become smarter in investing, yes it might be a little safer play when you only invest amounts you can adford to lose but it isn't a part of the smarter way tho.

So you were a part of the hodl team?, yes buying on dips are a good strategy. I usually calculate the deepest btc price base on a 6 months time frame. Since I cannot hold longer than that. I still have that mentality to always use your coins as a your contribution to the market

Hacked accounts are still one of the primary concern of this forum. I cannot suggest something im just hoping that someone can have a suggestion with regards to getting hacked accounts back to the real owners.

Is there a need to do so? If you can prove to me that the current management is incompetent then i might also vote for that but if you don't then there is no point in discussing this matter

Hmm I don't think if this is necessary for now the main concern as of now is to eliminate new accounts who were doing the scam act. Tho we were saying a little bit of positive result because of the 1 merit req to become a jr. Member

because they don't understand the technology it self they were only aware that this technology can be a medium for illegal activities because of the security that this technology provides. Internet will surely exists as long as the technology will continue to grow

I still think that it is, since I have also noticed the difference seeing threads with no more posts from newbies that might still be a good indication, you were right tho to just atleast wait for the price to go up but IMO your stats still relates to the current new rule.

If ever that the price will go up and the newbies will be swarming up again then that forfeits your data

Some are obvious but some people where new to me and haven't acrossed with them in some discussion. Quite interesting data tho

This is actually the reason why they are spying using their Huawei phone lol.

I just have concluded that as of the moment they can't still surpass US nor Japan when it comes to technology. Since they cannot solved the formula that currently US has been developing

I am quite more interested if you can maybe have a data for those countries which we do not expect to be in here?

I might want to site an example north korea, or any places around the world that we  might get shock that they actually are participating here.

Wrong, why would any investor invest on something that they do not understand? If thats the case then I consider those investors as an idiot. You can never understand decentralized currency without understanding how it is being used. Speculations are a part of it yes, but most of them just ended up losing their money

You can simply determine if it is necessary to move your thread to technical discussion.

As of the moment they are right that yor thread is actually gaining a real discussion and in fact it has more serious participants.

Just in case you will start seeing spammy posts in your thread then moving it would be your best option but ofcourse there would be lesser participants

I've already expected this kind of act from the chinese government. We know how they act in terms of controlling power.



Exactly but since i don't want how the chinese control there people it is still better to never be involved with that digital currency when they will launch that one

I like the way how you think it seems that you were demanding the market to goes down for your benefit. But the problem is that i think almost all are hoping for that situation lol. Except for those who havent get their profits yet.

If I were you, you should start learning to go in and out even if the price drops are not that high

Agree, if it is almost impossible to prove the gods existence and it is also impossible to prove that god does not exist.

What happens here is the conclusions of individuals, best example would the scientists(some scientists were tired of finding the root of life existence). Therefore some of them tend to conclude  that there might be a being who created everything while some scientists don't and still follows the idea.

Church is unfair when it comes to the point when money is being involved. (There is actually a saying that goes when you want to be reach build your own religion)