yeah, that's good. At least you can explain here even though you are part of the team. but it actually makes people think this project has been audited from Certik. Even though it's a future plan, I hope the developer can consider this, it would be better if they put the actual audit like the medium link above and then Certik when they are actually audited.

what's more they have to face the current bear market, if they don't get a solution soon, I'm afraid they can't survive in the market. Though this project is a very good concept, unfortunately it may be less active in their promotion so people see the aspect of their promotion as less interested, maybe the potential will show when the bear market ends, but hopefully they will also think about their promotion.

I believe what they say, if we really want to see our assets safe in the future there is no good investment except in bitcoin or ethereum. Since bitcoin is too expensive, I prefer to keep everything on ethereum without the slightest hesitation. I'm sure that among the many projects ethereum has the potential to be far more special, it makes me one step more confident than other projects.

I've heard of these games, they can't be played for multiplayer, even though monopoly games will be very exciting if played with other players who are found each other in the arena. Of course, you have to deal with many problems because building a P2E monopoly game is not easy. But, if it's not betting with the player, does that mean we're betting on the computer? it may seem so easy.

I'm not an IOS user, but some wallets with IOS have had problems lately, it seems they also announced that there was indeed a bug for their IOS application. As far as I'm using the extension from chrome, and the android app I didn't find any problem everything went very smoothly. Maybe you can try it, using another system like chrome or android extension for a while.

Indeed some bounty projects are not directly listed on the exchange they have a lot of preparation before it hits the exchange. Unfortunately everyone always doesn't want to wait, we bounty participants always want to sell it immediately even we will consider the project a success if they pay and can be sold immediately. Projects that take too long to process will surely be abandoned by the community.

This project is progressing pretty well, but I still see a lot of flaws in this project. Like a little Community in all social media, lack of funding etc. Is this project only to be devoted to application development for some time to come? I'm sure the community is just as important, maybe in the future there will be a promotion campaign like a bounty?

The game makes me a little confused, but it hasn't been launched yet it seems very unique I can't see it directly but from the web graphics it's very good I'm sure the game made will also be like that. But in the information I got for this game, no one has explained using the Play to earn concept, then how do games and tokens have an attachment to each other?

Encouraging those who are beginners to be successful here, of course, we do, but some of the people with cryptocurrency experience actually use this to extort beginners to get their money, because of that some people still don't believe it and even think bitcoin is a ponzi, they think it's just the beginning is the luckiest, I believe they are victims of junk coin scams, they must return to the right path to continue learning.

I'm not surprised that happened, even if the richest person in the world like him teamed up with the owner of Binance to take over Twitter it really really benefits them. I don't know if CZ and Elon Musk have known each other for a long time or they are just normal business partners, but if that's true, maybe in the future Elon Musk will be a supporter of BNB to grow like dogecoin but CZ will still be the owner. This is very beneficial for BNB holders.

I'm sure that no matter how hacked they are, we can't really blame them because it's certain that in an exchange to store users' assets, they always prioritize the security of their users' assets from hacker attacks. At least they put 2fa as the main security for their account it must be layered again with security in exchange it makes security layered. Unfortunately hackers always find any way to break it all, there are always loopholes in every security. Even when you say exchanges in your country have insane security that they can hack, this is actually hard to understand, but it's a true fact because I've also heard of major exchanges getting hacked even with high security.

if you ask it today, I believe it's a community. Even though the projects that are built are very simple, even imitating what is already there but if they get great support from the community it is not impossible that they can survive in the market with all conditions. Even if we look at dogecoin which is known to be abandoned by CEO it can still rise high with great support from their community.

Actually I also have a strong suspicion about it, a program that was created must have been equipped with high security layers. Especially when it comes to user property rights, such as brand assets on the platform, of course the security of the platform is made as perfect as possible. While there must have been a loophole, it would have taken at least years to get to it and it wasn't easy, unless it was an insider's negligence that led them to lose their exchange assets through their own fault.

I'm sure behind the stable of unofficial coins from the world's central banks, they will feel stifled when they can't grasp the flow of money wherever it comes from, if USDT can't be controlled well the banks will prefer to get another way by making their own coins ready to compete with other countries another stable coin. Unfortunately USDT has earned a more privileged platform in the cryptocurrency community, our trust is so high in USDT.

people will have two opinions about this, there are those who think the bear market is something that should not be feared anymore because cryptocurrencies are really growing well every year and the news that spread during the big bear in 2018 did not happen. There are also those who think that a good cryptocurrency every year will inevitably have bad things because it doesn't always grow well, I even prefer to support cryptocurrency to continue to grow every year as long as it can still produce.

I still think MATIC will have the same fate as BSC, they do have cheap gas costs which many people like as well as being an alternative to ethereum which gas is so high. Having many platforms that accept payments with the MATIC network is usually the NFT market. However, the generosity of transactions in the MATIC network is also used by criminals to create dusting tokens. Solana has a network that may be more complicated than an EVM network similar to etheruem, so not all token dusting is created there, their network looks really friendly so far.

I believe that NFT is different, the security is different, the blockchain code is made in such a way with high enough security. Especially if it has a large utility at a high price, such as NFT for yacht charter, surely they have prepared everything including security and those who bought it at such a high price must have considered this before buying it. What happened about the APE NFT event might be a hacker class or, or those who really understand the APE system itself, I don't think all NFTs have the same security because if that happened, everyone would never buy NFT.

So far cryptocurrency has always been a surprise, even if it is at a low point that many people think bitcoin will soon be abandoned in fact they are wrong. But I'm worried that with bitcoin going up every year, will there be any surprises in the future that will make bitcoin also go down like 2018? cryptocurrency cannot be predicted with certainty, 2018 could happen again, the most important thing is that we have prepared what we need to prepare.

So far the metaverse I've got is only play to earn games which makes them metaverse, but this isn't a real metaverse in my opinion. During my research on metaverse trends to date, there is still no project that has really succeeded in building their metaverse even if it's a long-standing project they are still developing. I also don't see for sure who will succeed in building their metaverse, because if the old project still can't build it what if there is a new pioneer project.

if it's safe, you can just sell it but I don't think it's necessary because it just wastes your gas costs on useless things. But a lot of people lately are talking about token dusting, if you transact with this it's the same as giving your wallet access to be stolen, that's so scary. Therefore it is more recommended to leave the tokens useless otherwise you could be exposed to token dusting because they are difficult to identify with certainty.