Bitcoin Forum
April 25, 2024, 07:18:52 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 ... 99 »
21  Economy / Reputation / Re: KingofSports : Account will be under new ownership soon. Request. on: January 15, 2015, 04:48:26 AM
yay, I am the new owner.

Can someone give me a briefing about what is the problem with KoS?


@Vod I can't PM you.
22  Economy / Reputation / Re: Vod Identity Found...If he has hurt you, join in. ??? what? on: January 15, 2015, 04:46:43 AM
Just saw this thread. Removed all trust given to Vod. Can't contact him.

Is there anyone else who has been given false trust here?

Huh
23  Economy / Gambling / Re: Is there a legit BTC anon blackjack site? Like SealsWithClubs, but for blackjack on: January 09, 2015, 06:29:40 PM
If you're looking for COMPLETE anonymous play, like no email or anything asked, go with Bitzino, been in the business for over 2 years and their limits per round are 100 BTC.

My recommendation would be fortunejack however and they ask for email I think, but thats it.
24  Economy / Invites & Accounts / Re: Limited paypal account balance 862$ on: January 09, 2015, 05:44:46 PM
I hope you know there is no guarantee that the funds can be withdrawn.  There is a 15% chance it will fail and you need new account numbers that haven't been used before (never been associated with paypal).

I can go on and on, but ill stop here... I see way to many red flags already
Curious as I'm currently waiting out 180 days for a low 4 figure amount with them...in what situation do they not allow you to withdraw your money after 180 days?
25  Other / Meta / Re: Three perfectly good examples of how the trust system is flawed on: January 09, 2015, 09:52:18 AM
I'm leaving bitcoin, selling this account Saturday evening but thought I would write this out as it has been one thing I have hated about this forum for awhile now.
Buyer still wants the account after it's revealed to have changed ownership?

Good buyer.
If you look at my trust its a useless account. They're going to use it for signature campaigning probably, or for what the buyer told me he said he's giving it to his friend cause he wants his friend to spend time here on the forum but his friend hates the newbie restrictions and such. You obviously haven't read much of the forum, cause I've been purposely saying I'm selling this account and offered a price for it which was offered to me in full today, for about a week now.

Anyways please stay on topic.

You're absolutely right I don't read too much of Digital goods (which is where I assume you've been posting in about selling this account?).

The trust system here is unmoderated (though I'm sure you've heard that too many times). I see no problem with having old accounts that used to scam and are still in green as long as they don't continue scamming. If they do, then the green trust becomes a problem. I do however advocate that these accounts be neg-reped when they scam, immediately.

Since you find the current trust system inaccurate and, well, untrustworthy, what are your suggestions?

P.S. Have you seen the recent thread in Meta, Replacing DefaultTrust?


I posted in goods and it got moved to digital goods which hardly anyone looks at.

I would argue you guys need to find out who is always on the forums, who is always calling people out in the lending or commenting in the scam accusations section and who appears to be trustworthy. The people deemed default trusted are the big companies, the big users, the members who DONT have time to be reading into scam accusations that don't pertain to them. Thus, scammers are slow to be negative repped (Tomatocage can only do so much). You need more people who can do or almost offer a bounty, like who reports the most proven scammers or who can do what Tomatocage does with him. User KWH has done some in the past but he stopped.

Vod is too critical with his judgements and mocks users. He isn't the example you want to follow. Tomatocage is, he leaves negative feedback (hell one of my negative feedback is from him) however I have sent him at least 50 users, links and the scam accusations against them for him to review because I always was on the forum and always wanted scammers quickly to be "red flagged". Its hard to say but honestly some sort of motivation might figure into how scammers can be seen and negative repped by the default trusted.

I also would suggest time be a small factor in the trust system and the overall rating. That way if someone scams recent but a year ago was the most trustworthy person ever, it doesn't take a ton of time for that person to show up as red overall.

I'll check this thread tomorrow. For now, time to sleep.
26  Other / Meta / Re: Three perfectly good examples of how the trust system is flawed on: January 09, 2015, 09:15:50 AM
I'm leaving bitcoin, selling this account Saturday evening but thought I would write this out as it has been one thing I have hated about this forum for awhile now.
Buyer still wants the account after it's revealed to have changed ownership?

Good buyer.
If you look at my trust its a useless account. They're going to use it for signature campaigning probably, or for what the buyer told me he said he's giving it to his friend cause he wants his friend to spend time here on the forum but his friend hates the newbie restrictions and such. You obviously haven't read much of the forum, cause I've been purposely saying I'm selling this account and offered a price for it which was offered to me in full today, for about a week now.

Anyways please stay on topic.
27  Other / Meta / Re: My account was hacked (segvec) on: January 09, 2015, 09:14:08 AM
I think you are misunderstanding what happened...

Segvec - the one who scammed for 14 BTC (as of now, it hasn't be repaid), his account was hacked today. I don't believe he is saying it got hacked over a month ago and that person who scammed HBO (or took the 14 BTC interest free loan) wasn't him.

Following correctly or no stanoz?
28  Other / Meta / Three perfectly good examples of how the trust system is flawed on: January 09, 2015, 09:04:50 AM
Three accounts:
1) Charlie Shrem aka Yankee - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=21181

Scam Accusation: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=817069.0

He was the owner of bitinstant, so he got a lot of rep back then for running such a business. HOWEVER, he has disappeared and owes over 25 BTC and has for months now. Yet he's still in the green and what many would consider a trustworthy account from the outside. The only ones who have left negative feedback are those who are not on default trust list.

2) Coinhoarder - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=67959

Scam Accusation: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=817069.0

This one kills me. This guy bought a couple things from people trustworthy and instantly got green trust. He isn't even light green, hes a solid 7 green. He took two debts and has failed to fully pay them off (at least 1 of 5 BTC remaining). He offered a contest for 5 BTC and never paid the winner. Over a year ago. Only people who marked him of course were those who were untrusted.

CONCLUSION: The biggest flaw is that the trustworthy on this site are the old members and the old members don't spend as much time on here anymore. They also don't look for scammers or anything, the only one who does is Tomatocage. So many members USED TO BE trustworthy and gained an extensive amount of rep, however once they scam their account doesn't reach red unless they really piss off EVERYONE hence TF for example. The people who have the ability to mark someone a scammer do not participate in marking people who are proven scammers, as a scammer. Tomatocage's rep can only hurt someone who used to be trustworthy so much. Not enough people on the default trust care about correcting misgiven trust after someone turns out to be a scammer. These accounts left trustworthy are then abandoned, resold, and then used to scam further.

These two accounts are two perfectly good examples of accounts that should be in the red with the "trade with extreme caution" but are not.

Everyday almost for the past 2 months I have sent Tomatocage links to accounts that have been scamming to get them the red trust they deserve.

A third example, user Lazlo who created the thread RipDice. His site NEVER paid out. He bumped his thread for 3 months. Just recently, last week HE FINALLY was red trusted by Tomatocage after I messaged him to get it done. However, you look at the thread and so many people call him out as a scammer.

3) Lazlo - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=367551

RipDice Thread (read thru, you'll see the scam accusations): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=834371.0

Not enough is done to combat the scammers around here. The small time lending criminals are gotten everytime but the real scams, the ones who can do real damage of 4 figures or higher are often left unnoticed or ignored completely and hence I'm almost positive if Charlie Shrem or CoinHoarder came on here they could scam easily with their accounts. Why? Cause no one has followed through with the maintaining of their trust. The trust system works two ways: 1) to add/remove trust to those that get or earn the positive or negative and 2) To maintain current trust levels of members on a regular basis, especially ones assumed to be trusted by the system.

I'm leaving bitcoin for good, but thought I would write this out as it has been one thing I have hated about this forum for awhile now.
29  Economy / Invites & Accounts / Re: [WTS] This account for 0.1516 BTC on: January 09, 2015, 05:35:52 AM
Found someone who will take it. Unlocking cause hacked segvec was interested.

Edit again: In process of setting up an escrow with Tomatocage for the account. Will update if the escrow is funded and thus going to be sold successfully.
30  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: SEGVEC CONNED ME OUT OF 14.09 BTC on: January 09, 2015, 04:30:42 AM
He is currently trying to purchase another account. Looks like he has BTC to toss at that. Perhaps it is time you contacted the authorities.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=915393

LOL, contact the authorities and report a ghost who is making payments on the "debt owed".
They will laugh and say "you're lucky you are getting anything considering the guy is a ghost on the net".


Sent 0.098392 BTC ---worth $28.00 USD--- to the address provided. ---> 1HbKQ433CErM6v4ebXzfvpEcFnnPDfcwkK.

HBO --- understand that the funds will be paid back to you.
Those commenting on here are just trying to get you amped up and hyped...for no apparent reason, LOL.

If I leave, there is absolutely nothing you can do...
BUT, I am a man of my word.

The payments will continue to come; as promised.

RAWTED, shove this $28.00 USD up your ass...peon.
Naming yourself after a famous hacker does not make you one. I think you've been shown tonight that everyone leaves a trail. Pay your debt, and I'll restore that trust.
can you borrow me 2 btc? I repay 14 btc to you and 15 to hbo go
Okay so we know you hacked his account. Curious, what was his password when you hacked it? Maybe give us some clue bout this guy.
31  Economy / Invites & Accounts / [WTS] This account for 0.1516 BTC on: January 09, 2015, 12:27:25 AM
Selling this account for 0.1516 BTC (0.15 for me, 0.0016 for tx fee n Tomato's fee) for this account ONLY. Escrow through tomatocage is fine.

This account is enrolled in the bitmixer.io program and I am able to use it indefinitely because I was the first to sign up with them and have spoken with them about this since I have also used their services.

Trade will occur anytime after 11:30pm EST on Saturday January 10th because I am set to receive 0.035 payout already Saturday evening for my posts in the previous week. If you want it now (before then), you must pay 0.035 more.

ROI in less than a month, a great investment. PM me if interested or wish to make an offer. Thanks.

NOTE: If you make a stupid post that is obvious spam and you have a signature campaign going I will remove your post. All other posts will remain except for any posted by Vod.
32  Other / Archival / Move to trash please on: January 09, 2015, 12:26:14 AM
Delete
33  Other / Archival / Re: [WTS] This account for 0.1314 BTC on: January 09, 2015, 12:24:00 AM
You should contact who gave you the bad feedback and get them to revise it. Then it might be worth something but now its useless.
Tired of the spammers posting idiotic comments just to get paid for posting. Locking and recreating with self-moderated there. Note the only comments that will be deleted are ones that are obvious spam.
34  Economy / Auctions / Re: [Just-Dice.com] UID 1470 on: January 08, 2015, 11:27:26 PM
Reminds me of when I sold ID #11 on just dice for 5 BTC (BTC was $110/BTC then).

Sold 50298 for 0.50 clams today. Good luck with the auction.
35  Other / Archival / Re: [WTS] This account for 0.1314 BTC on: January 08, 2015, 10:42:01 PM
LOL

You're hilarious. Finally bought (or registered and matured) another account, Ian, you sly old dog.........

Who you planning to scam next?
I'm leaving bitcoin actually. Bitcoin is unhealthy for my well being.
36  Other / Archival / Re: [WTS] This account for 0.1314 BTC on: January 08, 2015, 10:19:11 PM
With this trust rating dont expect anyone to pay more than 0.05 let along 0.1
Cool thanks for your opinion and thanks for spamming the forum obviously. Only reason you posted was to get paid that 0.0007 for your post.

Like I said, this account will make you 0.035. Who gives a shit about the trust. I'd rather sell a negative account anyways so there's no chance this account is used to scam and I get used later on.

This account will make you 0.035 /week. It is simple an investment.
37  Economy / Trading Discussion / Re: Trying to clean up my account on: January 08, 2015, 09:53:16 PM
I'll take KoS's advice if that's the case
Good choice. Don't try to scam or get loans on the new account. You can find accounts being sold in the goods - digital goods section.

In all honesty, you'll never get your account out of negative feedback. Once done here especially by Vod, it will never be removed.

Nonsense.  Pay back the 2btc you stole, and I'll remove the negative feedback.

To the OP:  You would need to pay back your loan with proper interest for the year before I would consider removing your negative feedback.

Ha. I don't owe anything but if I did or made a 2 BTC gift payment to pay that claimed "owed" amount I'm sure you'd remove the negative rep regarding the loan but not the rep about me wanting you dead and threats (which I really hope someone does take you out eventually, I'll donate to their lawyer costs if that happened). So thus, the "trade with extreme caution" next to my name WOULD NOT disappear.

Trust me, Vod likes to lie through his teeth. Yes he MIGHT remove the rep regarding the supposed loan but no way in hell he would remove all of his negative feedback. Thats the person Vod is, he says one things but finds loopholes to not follow his word.

Probably my last post in this section, good luck to all lenders in future endeavors.
38  Other / Archival / [WTS] This account for 0.1314 BTC on: January 08, 2015, 09:31:27 PM
Selling this account for 0.1314 BTC (0.13 for me, 0.0014 for tx fee n Tomato's fee) for this account ONLY. Escrow through tomatocage is fine.

This account is enrolled in the bitmixer.io program and I am able to use it indefinitely because I was the first to sign up with them and have spoken with them about this since I have also used their services.

Trade will occur anytime after 11:30pm EST on Saturday January 10th because I am set to receive 0.035 payout already Saturday evening for my posts in the previous week. If you want it now (before then), you must pay 0.035 more.

ROI in less than a month, a great investment. PM me if interested or wish to make an offer. Thanks.
39  Economy / Trading Discussion / Re: Trying to clean up my account on: January 08, 2015, 06:42:59 PM
In all honesty, you'll never get your account out of negative feedback. Once done here especially by Vod, it will never be removed.

You're only a member account so its not a big deal, take 0.05 BTC and buy yourself a new, fresh account. Or just create a new account.

It'd be nice if you repaid your debt but it won't do anything to get your account out of negative trust. Ever.
40  Economy / Auctions / Re: [Auction] This Account + Another Full Member/Senior/Hero Account on: January 07, 2015, 05:31:09 PM
I'd entertain offers of .25 or more. If not I'll just give them to my friend to hold for awhile.
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 ... 99 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!