Bglod is finally seeing some action.
^^ Have I missed the origin of a new meme? Ahh. I'm pretty sure they meant bgodl.  |
|
|
|
Sorry if this was mentioned already. I'm too lazy to check. It seems bitcoin was the subject at the presidential briefing yesterday. Sarah Sanders sez the president (and some advisors she named) were 'monitoring' it. @15:00 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qzskJmAHyckNot sure if this is before or after the bitcoin Big Bang Theory episode. |
|
|
|
This is clearly as high as bitcoin will ever get, basically. Maybe just a little bit higher because there are people who haven't realized this is a failed experiment, but that's it. 1 bitcoin will absolutely never be worth $50k. $100k? LOL, no.
What'd I tell you guys? That was the last ATH bitcoin will ever see. People are finally waking up to how much of a failure this project is. Here, if bitcoin gets over GDAX ATH of $11,485, I'll give the the first person to quote me here the last of my bitcoin, which is 0.1 BTC. I think it would be extremely interesting to see what proudhon really values his bitcoin at. I'll make a bid (above $0) for that 0.1 BTC ok? I won't even insist on the requirement that it goes over the ath to trigger the transaction. $100. |
|
|
|
Good morning Bitcoinland.
Consolidating sideways around $6.6k I see... currently $6585USD/$8407CAD (Bitcoinaverage).
Total forkcoins (excluding BCH-ABC) are at $1538USD/$1960CAD (Coinmarketcap).
After yesterday's fine recovery, consolidation is good. Hopefully we'll continue upward soon.
It's clear what the "real" Bitcoin is. A big-blocker reaction after x2 cancellation was to be expected. Luckily it didn't last long.
Go Bitcoin go.
What the heck is BCH-ABC? Jeez you been living under a rock? It's BCC, of course.  Silly me. And BCC is? I wuz gonna tell you to look it up and you'd find the ticker is actually bitconnect. But I'd feel guilty. BCC=BCH=ABC are the various ticker symbols and software project names for the new bcash coin. They stupidly chose BCC even tho it was already in use (BitConnect), so everyone else changed it to BCH. ABC was the open source project which was actually launched later as bitcoin cash (BCH) - which most people now call bcash. Simple, innit? /s edit: got the quotes all wrong. |
|
|
|
Good morning Bitcoinland.
Consolidating sideways around $6.6k I see... currently $6585USD/$8407CAD (Bitcoinaverage).
Total forkcoins (excluding BCH-ABC) are at $1538USD/$1960CAD (Coinmarketcap).
After yesterday's fine recovery, consolidation is good. Hopefully we'll continue upward soon.
It's clear what the "real" Bitcoin is. A big-blocker reaction after x2 cancellation was to be expected. Luckily it didn't last long.
Go Bitcoin go.
What the heck is BCH-ABC? Jeez you been living under a rock? It's BCC, of course. |
|
|
|
goat is canny ... he bought the lambo, new, and then sold it on when btc had tanked ... pretty sure he would have got back in near the lows. A couple years ago I made a ThailandBitcoin subreddit. In the middle of a thread on bitcoin exchanges and the 'banning' of bitcoin in thailand, goat said: "Yes I bought a Lambo with XBT but I recently sold it and bought more XBT. It was a pro XBT PR stunt that also helped me acquire more XBT" ( https://www.reddit.com/r/BitcoinThailand/comments/2ysqmh/exchanges/) The thread mostly consisted of him and a thai exchange owner slinging crap at each other ... worth a read. |
|
|
|
I believe this is just a report that 2 groups have found some of the normal matter that we knew was there but had not detected. Dark matter unaffected. why should dark matter be unaffected by this discovery? dark matter is what scientist called missing/undetected matter. the saw the gravitation effects of missing/undetected matter, but they did not see matter itself. so they called it dark matter. now this mystery is solved, there is no dark matter anymore. as far as I understood. Dark matter by definition is stuff which does not interact (or does so extremely weakly) with normal matter (our standard model stuff) except via gravitation. This stuff they've found is normal matter. It's hot ferkrissakes - radiating photons. Obviously dark matter doesn't do that. |
|
|
|
I believe this is just a report that 2 groups have found some of the normal matter that we knew was there but had not detected. Dark matter unaffected. |
|
|
|
there are no races ffs. there are racists like you, though.
There actually are races, between something like 20-50 races. But its not about the color of the skin as you may think, but features. And the color of the skin is mostly about geography and exposure to the Sun for multiple generations. (millennia maybe) Jeez. People get so fkd up these days by the political correctness. Follow this story: There's a thing called human dna. It gets continually randomized. Humans spread out into all kinds of ecological niches. Some mutations are handy in some niches; others are bad (and tend to die off). So each niche creates a cluster of certain dna strings with higher/lower probability than other niches. These clusters can grow to be so different that speciation occurs where interbreeding no longer works. The ones you're talking about ('races' by definition) have enough differences to be noticeable, measureable, significant depending on people's definition of race. The differences include obvious stuff like skin color (yes, it's in the dna) as well as IQ and many other differences not so obvious. Not so hard is it? Saying there are no races just means you have a new definition of the word 'race'. That kind of language change marks the politically correct. |
|
|
|
Congrats to harrymmmm, what a nice present for you... 0.5 BTC sounds sooo fat these days...
And many thx to micgoossens, really enjoyed the game, and don't worry about being hated, this often means you're doing something right...
Kraken ATH: 4315 EUR <-- Already broken! LOL!
THIS IS GENTLEMEN!
'Tis incredible to think that half a bitcoin - something we would barely have noticed a few years ago - is now like $2500usd. 100 pizzas or so! |
|
|
|
I gave a different address to you before, but i'd like to keep non-bch addresses separate, so here's a better one: 1EpzWUZvWc4vDt6yyWMg6shPihizzfYefs Thx for your generosity holding these lotteries. When you recieve please post a proove of payemt ..... thx Confirmed: https://blockchain.info/address/1EpzWUZvWc4vDt6yyWMg6shPihizzfYefsThe first confirmation happened less than a minute from the broadcast tx. Looks like bitcoin is working as intended once again - glad we've discarded the dead weight and pushed them off to their own chain(s). |
|
|
|
I gave a different address to you before, but i'd like to keep non-bch addresses separate, so here's a better one: 1EpzWUZvWc4vDt6yyWMg6shPihizzfYefs Thx for your generosity holding these lotteries. |
|
|
|
congratulation to us hodlers and to harrymmmm for predicting the new ATH Woot! I NEVER win lotteries - this is a nice first. |
|
|
|
13 or 14 from what it looks like to be... But nice try! Good luck next time! =)))) ... that guy with 10/10 made me scratch my head a bit 2-3 days ago when I was looking at the charts. But I was a fool not to take into account any or even the smallest slightest correction. I'm up atm. Thought I'd missed out but just now we had a $50 rip. I'm back in the race I think. Another couple like that will do it. Go bitcoin! We (well I) need an ath in the next 17 hours. |
|
|
|
END list, good luck!
...
10/10 bikerlezno* LAST WINNER
it looks like lightning will strike twice at the same spot. A new ATH within 2 hours? I doubt it. I think Ted E Bare and HarryMMMM have a much better chance, or maybe Cryptoqueen. Cryptoqueen would be crazy ....Thats my girlfriend and her Bday 😊 ;-) I find myself suddenly interested in the minutia of this lottery. Is the ath on bitstamp? Is the day measured from 0000UTC? |
|
|
|
10/10 bikerlezno* LAST WINNER
This guy could be the winner again OMG NOOOOOO!!!!! I need another couple days dammit. Would be good to see us break $5k in a day tho. Lol. I'm confused again.   |
|
|
|
Only by miners that agree to implement this, and do not renege. What guarantee do you have that this will be the case? For that matter, what guarantee do you have that someone does not know the private key corresponding to this address?
The miners that don't agree to this, would not be on SegWit2X. There is no private key for this address, but the redeem script has been published, so anyone can spend whatever is there. So one could use the address given + redeem script on the input side of a splitting transaction? Does that work if there isn't even one satoshi in the address? |
|
|
|
17EfwXke5y4GAFKSeXoK9cYXTNTgew2YwG MrJacan bitcointalk.org and today 2017.08.31 quoted for posterity. Not sure how I didn't already do this, but here's my info: name: harrymmmm btc address: 1harryJLHBcivP4sFQjTMDPfYHXBUT7ED please quote. |
|
|
|
Most people following the saga know that there was never a consensus about 2X. A majority for it yes, but not a consensus. If the choice is following people with untested 2X code in a hard fork, or staying with core, we don't know if there would still be a majority for the fork.
Not that I disagree, but your reply seems unrelated to my thesis. My point was that the whole thing can be framed as in the OP. Then ethically and morally there's no reason to follow through with the agreement you've signed under duress. Even politically (to maintain your reputation as someone who keeps his word, for example), there's a face-saving way out by pointing to the duress. I doubt these companies saw themselves as being blackmailed, but they actually were (in an arguably extreme definition of the word). Once they point to the duress, they need not feel obliged to keep their agreement. |
|
|
|
Core never accepted.
To their credit I guess I could have made 'Everyone signed an agreement to that effect.' clearer. edited OP to change 'everyone' to 'both sides' |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
