I cannot see any way that the government can actually govern bitcoin. Bitcoin is decentralized, anywhere in this world has bitcoin (by anywhere I mean anywhere with internet access) so how come that a government of a specific country could govern bitcoin. Another, bitcoin is anonymous, how can the government track its citizens if they cannot identify who has bitcoin or who uses bitcoin. I know it's a big IF but I would like to hear ideas on how the government will govern bitcoin.

Having high trading volume, there is no doubt that bitcoin will become popular in the middle east sooner or later. Though the amount was not yet that big, this indicates that Saudi Arabia is beginning to fully accept the bitcoin technology, and it will take only a matter of time for its fame to burst throughout the middle east.

Having these type of news is so promising. We can clearly see how bitcoin's popularity had become in the past years. It would seem that we hear news about bitcoin left and right mostly every week.  I think that it will not take too long for bitcoin to become famous worldwide.

Bitcoin gave me the opportunity to earn while waiting for me to finish my degree. Bitcoin has been helping me in saving money for the future. I have high hopes for bitcoin. Add the fact that bitcoin's value is heading upward, we cannot deny that having bitcoin now is a good decision. I just hope that earning bitcoin today will be beneficial to me in the near future.

May I ask in what particular aspect in the bitcoin network will these attackers will attack? I am not a technical person about these type of events so my curiosity was just triggered.

As a decentralized cryptocurrency, it only needs internet in order for it to exist. So if this internet being dead, bitcoin will obviously freeze. When the internet is restored, even in just areas, bitcoin will be up and running again right. How come that bitcoin will be weak from the first minute of startup knowing that bitcoin is decentralized and no server to be attacked?

Check the quality of your posts dude. That will answer why yahoo did not accept you at all.

Just wait for further notice. As far as I know, those 21 are accepted from pages 1 and 2 only. Other applicants are not yet evaluated. Patience please.

Btctalk name - Wesimon
Rank -  Member
Current post count - 70
BTC Address - 3AQ9NELhgTW8wL2SJzfDHc3Uy6RbcxamMp
Wear appropriate signature - done

Looking forward in working with you again sir yahoo 

Payment received. Thanks yo-ex. Sadly, I would like to temporarily leave this campaign for some reason. Thank you for letting me work with you yo-ex.

Since when bitcoin became a gaming site or a trading site? Bitcoin is just used in those particular sites. Bitcoin is just like money in its own ways.

Complaining about bitcoin in what particular aspect? Come to think  of it, why would anyone complain about bitcoin? Did anyone complained about fiat? What is the sense of complaining then?

You had it all wrong! Currency and money are just often used interchangeably, but they are not the same at all. Based from your quote "...A more general definition is that a currency is a system of money (monetary units) in common use" clearly state that currency is a system of money and not the actual money itself.

Even if you have patience, bitcoin's transaction confirmation still take time to be confirmed. As for the scenario "...get a coffee from Starbucks...", using bitcoin is impractical and it is indeed difficult to use bitcoin in a daily basis. Well if you have all the time in the world then your patience will come in handy. But let's be practical here, who would wait for an hour just to pay for a coffee which I think before you can pay for it, you already finished drinking it minutes ago (30 minutes or so). Fiat is still practical for this type of transaction.

I think you clearly did not understand that discussion. jc89 there claims that the number of bitcoin users is less than 1% of the total population and now you claim that the number of bitcoin users is more than that. And your reply was even out of the discussion. What gives man?

I suggest you to read first the opening or the first post before asking such question. The OP is clear on his part that he is pertaining to the strength of bitcoin from hackers and not as a currency. On the other hand, I agree that bitcoin will always be prone from hackers because it is a system. It contains codes and algorithm which is the specialty of hackers.

I ranked up from Jr Member to Member. If I will be ranked up also in the spreadsheet for the next week will be nice 
dev, I will update my signature now to my proper rank.

I think it's a must to be accessible in mobile since almost all uses smartphone. Having Yo-Ex accessible to smartphone is indeed beneficial to its clients.

How come that anonymity is a problem? This is a characteristic of bitcoin and others are just using it negatively. Some wallet providers already had that kind of feature. They are requiring for a government-issued ID (a picture of that ID), even they require the wallet user to take a selfie for verification, as well as verifying email and cellphone numbers. These type of wallet is already existing.

Especially on democratic/republican state or country where the power rests in the hand of the people. As long as the majority of people in a particular country would want to legalize bitcoin, the government has to accept it. Well I think that the government should not wait for that scenario. Just accept bitcoin and utilize its capability and use it to become the government's advantage.

That is exactly what is happening currently. To think that only a small portion of the world's population is using bitcoin for transactions, what more if the whole world uses bitcoin. I'm afraid that the current system that handles every transaction is very far from being capable of handling a massive number of transactions. This needs a lot of improvements and attention.

Thanks. It would seem that tomorrow is the day to know whether this will continue or not.
Anyways, I do hope for the success of Yo-Ex 

dev, for how long does this signature campaign will be running? Thanks