When will you be on the exchange?
You can see it in our RoadMap on site  20-31 March |
|
|
|
Discord Invite competition starts now! Join it and receive your reward! |
|
|
|
 Special for 2018 FIFA World CupWe offer you a completely new way of using cryptocurrency... Fast. Secured. Anonymous.You are footbal fan? You should use it! Before the 2018 FIFA we will cooperate with lots of major bookmakers.You can increase your capital hundreds of times!You are not football fan?Of course there are benefits for you too!
With amazing ROI and small price of MN you can earn a lot of money!Oh, you still think that this si another sh*t coin and do not want to buy?We have answer for you: listing on exchange and cooperating with bookmakers will as soon as we have money!
We are loyal fans of football.
We want to bring here something new, something that I have never seen.
Just support us and football!
https://league.express/
Downloads
For Ubuntu 14.04
For Windows
Source
Social networks & Contacts
Telegram Group
Telegram Channel
Discord Group
Facebook
Twitter
Token info
Ticker - LGA
Type - Proof-of-Stake
Pre-mine amount - Proof-of-Stake
Total supply - Proof-of-Stake
Coin mature time - 8 Hours
Algorithm - Scrypt
Block time - 60 Seconds
Price of masternode - 3000
Token distribution
Team - 10%
Exchanges listing - 22%
Cooperation with bookmakers - 31%
Promotion - 47%
ICO Stages
Stage 1 - 50% of LGA - 0.5$
Stage 2 - 30% of LGA - 1$
Stage 3 - 20% of LGA - 2$
|
|
|
|
In Jeff Garzik's interview on CBSnews online June 8, he described bitcoin succinctly as:
"a decentralized electronic currency with no central bank" and "a worldwide currency". So that's what it is.
Well, I am just one person blathering my own opinion. Until there's a court case or other precedent or an administrative ruling, all we have to go on [in the USA, where I live] is the experience of BitcoinUSA. BitcoinUSA apparently receiving guidance pointing them to the 2009 FinCEN administrative ruling on stored value. Will lawyers, rather than laypersons such as myself, call it a commodity, currency, virtual good or other, ultimately? I have no idea, and your input on that subject is certainly welcome and encouraged on these forums. |
|
|
|
You don't get how cashing out 50x340 bitcoins at once in 50 accounts to bypass transaction account limits to withdraw 340,000 dollars at once and more other the next few days could possibly crash the bitcoin market?
Ok, newbies, calm down. Deep breath. Those coins in the LulzSec tweet have not been spent (ie. not sent to mtgox etc.). The coins have not been sold, therefore those sales did not crash the market. Either they are taking credit for someone else's coin transfer, or they hacked into a miner and stole their wallet. |
|
|
|
I'm not sure what "inaccurate observation or assumption" in my paper you are referring to. I stated that the enforced limits (like indeed transaction fee) are not optimal ones. And that I think that they should definitly not be under control of a small group of developers.
That is a central fallacy throughout your paper. The entire community accepts or rejects bitcoin changes. They vote by choosing which bitcoin version to run on the network. Open source means anyone can fork the code at any time, if the community feels developers are going off into insane-land. |
|
|
|
This paper is filled with inaccurate observations and assumptions. Please name one, or, if you have the time, some. I'm very happy to learn and if I'm wrong I will happily admit so. The transaction fee has already been lowered. |
|
|
|
This paper is filled with inaccurate observations and assumptions. |
|
|
|
|
Version 0.3.22 has one known problem: 'getwork' mining on Windows fails.
If you (a) are not mining with bitcoind, or (b) you are not on Windows, then everything is OK.
|
|
|
|
|
Confirmed. No specific security vulnerabilities are forthcoming.
|
|
|
|
|
getblockbycount / getblockbyhash RPCs updated to latest git.
|
|
|
|
Also check the ratings thoroughly. Just because someone is rated high and ident'd does not mean they are legit, there have been speculations about people pumping up their own ratings with multiple accounts
That is what ;;gettrust USERNAME
is there for. A simple rating does not tell you whether or not that person is connected to your trust network. |
|
|
|
Ok, I upgraded to the new version. But now my client is not showing any connections, so is not downloading any more blocks. Is there a way to get more connections?
It will take a long time, unfortunately (could be a few hours), due to massive influx of new bitcoin users. We should have that fixed in 0.3.23. A useful workaround is -dnsseed |
|
|
|
You all should really be more careful making these sort of grandiose statements with regards to terms and laws you don't actually understand.
No, that was advice given by US Department of Treasury. Feel free to call them and complain about their grandiose statements... |
|
|
|
Updated MAC OSX link on http://www.bitcoin.org/ to point to 0.3.22, rather than 0.3.21. Sorry I missed that detail, folks. |
|
|
|
Let me guess: you did not bother to watch the video and see what was actually stated. |
|
|
|
Can anyone confirm that Gavin (or other lead developers) have gotten specifics from Appelbaum?
I am still waiting for a response... <insert sound of crickets chirping> |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
