Bitcoin Forum
July 11, 2020, 05:46:10 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.20.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 ... 119 »
1  Other / Meta / Re: Bitcointalk history of MtGox and how a Bitcointalk post caught the MtGox hacker. on: July 02, 2020, 04:07:20 PM
The Kleiman case against Craig S Wright has brought up a few new MtGox references.

Most notably the Claim by Craig S Wright that he is the owner of the bitcoin address where bitcoins from the first MtGox hack ended up.

This was followed by a letter sent by Craigs lawyers to blockstream claiming the addresses.








Last week the New Zealand police seized us$90 million in assets controlled by Alexander Vinnik. (The Russian accused of laundering the proceeds of the second MtGox hack ).

2  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: SCAM: Bitcoin SV (BSV) - fake team member and plagiarized white paper on: June 13, 2020, 12:41:10 AM
Even the cultists are finding it hard to believe:

3  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: SCAM: Bitcoin SV (BSV) - fake team member and plagiarized white paper on: June 03, 2020, 10:21:16 AM

I'm a bit sad he hasn't come after me or other Bitcointalkers yet -- what are we, chopped liver? This is his forum, after all (supposedly).

My bet is there are peops here who could put him away for a long time and he knows it.

I think he has bigger problems.

No statute of limitations on indictable offenses in New South Wales / Australia.



4  Economy / Service Announcements / Re: Cryptopia Cryptocurrency Platform Services and Development on: May 30, 2020, 02:54:40 PM
I just cannot understand why the owners of Cryptopia decided to bring in the administrators/liquidators so soon after the alleged hack.

If just 10% of the total coins were allegedly stolen then the loss was not an insurmountable figure, they should easily have been able to recoup the losses via their profits generated from transaction and listing fees.

There was always something from the word go that just did not sound correct as soon as the stories about an alleged hack occurred.



Because under NZ law it is illegal to knowingly trade while insolvent.
The clients had left the exchange after a month of police investigation. There was no volume to trade out of the situation.
They had no choice but to call in the liquidators.

The liquidators have applied to the courts for further guidance on distribution.
5  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Craig Steven Wright - Satoshi, MtGox Hacker or just a fraud ? on: May 30, 2020, 02:44:10 PM


If Craig Steven Wright really controlled 1FeexV6bAHb8ybZjqQMjJrcCrHGW9sb6uF as certified by his lawyer and presented in the Supreme Court of New South Wales then he would be the hacker involved in the first major MtGox theft.

Court document can be seen here:
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4462663-24-4.html#document/p5/a423127

Is that document actually from the Supreme Court of New South Wales though. How did you verify that document was presented in court? Your link is not from the court.

The Supreme Court of NSW filing was disclosed in the Kleiman v Wright Florida case. Certified court records were filed there.
6  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: SCAM: Bitcoin SV (BSV) - fake team member and plagiarized white paper on: May 30, 2020, 02:37:52 PM
Today another knock-back for Craig S Wright.

Hot damn. There is a glitch in the matrix somewhere. He needs to dispatch one of his 11yr olds into the bowels of his reality generator to put this right. It's starting to pour steam and make grinding noises.

Soon enough it's gonna blow. Don't be near when it happens.


Craig doesn't have a very good record winning cases.

DeMorgan - Craig was convicted of contempt of court charges and lost on appeal.

Hodlonaut - Craig lost in Norway (being appealed), Craig lost in UK

Roger Ver - Craig lost in UK and lost on appeal. Judgement against Craig for costs.

Adam Back - Craig withdrew the case and paid full costs to Adam Back.

Vatalik Buterin - Craig has been unable to effect service.

McCormack - still in progress.

Kleiman - Judgement against Craig for partial costs. Still in progress.
7  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: SCAM: Bitcoin SV (BSV) - fake team member and plagiarized white paper on: May 29, 2020, 12:13:57 PM
Today another knock-back for Craig S Wright.

He lost the appeal in the Court of Appeal against the Wright v Ver verdict:









Source: https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2020/672.pdf
8  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: SCAM: Bitcoin SV (BSV) - fake team member and plagiarized white paper on: May 16, 2020, 04:23:44 PM
Proof by anno - worth nothing

grow up ppl and gain legal quality



Proof of ammo - priceless

https://medium.com/@paintedfrog/craig-wright-plagiarized-significant-portions-of-his-phd-thesis-and-tried-to-hide-it-80cd8f01459
Quote


Bird nests for botnets. Stunningly bad plagiarism. This guy's only talent is in conning the credulous.

Any more excuses from his fanbase is merely staggeringly wilful ignorance and wholly delusional.




[satire] Charles Sturt University new 2021 course offering:

9  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: SCAM: Bitcoin SV (BSV) - fake team member and plagiarized white paper on: May 05, 2020, 11:56:56 PM
Not surprising. The man apparently doesn't possess an original thought of his own. As evidenced by our resident troll, of course this won't deter the tools who already drank the Kool Aid from continuing to put their eggs in a fraudulent basket.

Is anyone out there compiling a list of achievements and revelations he actually HAS had a hand in? Are there any?

It's looking like he's spent so much time stealing from others that had he devoted the same amount to something original he would've solved world hunger and baldness by now.

I don't know if he has the skill to deviate from his current conduct.
10  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: SCAM: Bitcoin SV (BSV) - fake team member and plagiarized white paper on: May 05, 2020, 05:35:01 AM

I'm kind of sad that only 1 of the 4 ever responded in this thread, and that was the guy with the long (longest?) hair. His name eludes me at the moment but he was here.

I was kind of hoping that Craig would stop by in the form of leaving a comment as satoshi just to show everyone who's boss. Sadly, that never materialized.

Have you guys been following the latest with Jimmy Nguyen? Apparently he claims he was always available to receive the subpoena from Ira Kleiman's lawyers but has just been too busy. He's been so busy that he hasn't had time to tweet or check his twitter either, I guess.

Here is a whole thread dedicated to faketoshis.

People claiming to be Satoshi (List of Faketoshis)

Painted frog just did a fantastic analysis of CSWs Phd Thesis which appears to be plagiarized from multiple sources.

https://medium.com/@paintedfrog/craig-wright-plagiarized-significant-portions-of-his-phd-thesis-and-tried-to-hide-it-80cd8f01459


11  Other / Ivory Tower / Re: People claiming to be Satoshi (List of Faketoshis) on: April 29, 2020, 06:04:30 AM
Love the idea of this thread, an all in on collation of faketoshis  Smiley
I don’t want to spam  up your thread , but I’ve been interested in this myself and found the US copyright website

https://cocatalog.loc.gov/cgi-bin/Pwebrecon.cgi?Search_Arg=Bitcoin%3A+A+Peer-to-Peer+Electronic+Cash+System&Search_Code=TALL&PID=oyefnTa_Nuq7akCTyLQ_8zn7xtCh&SEQ=20200106132453&CNT=25&HIST=1



There appears to be 6 applications in for the whitepaper, so I can only assume that these people of claiming to be Satoshi ?

2 - applications are from Guido
1 - from CSW
1- appears to be from Ronald Keala Kua Maria
1 - from Wei Liu ?
1 - from Arthur van Pelt ?

All details are on the website and apologies if I am spamming  Smiley



Wei Liu and Arthur Van Pelt both registered the copyright to demonstrate how easy it is to lodge a copyright. They both claim "we are all Satoshi" rather than that they wrote the whitepaper.

https://www.coindesk.com/everyone-can-be-satoshi-wei-liu-on-contesting-craig-wrights-copyright

Quote
Liu is a crypto entrepreneur from China and said his goal in registering the document was to point out that copyright is technically meaningless in this context. To be clear, Liu chose not to answer whether or not he is Satoshi Nakamoto when asked by CoinDesk.

He said:

“I filed it just to let people know anyone can register a copyright. Everyone can be Satoshi Nakamoto.”









12  Other / Off-topic / Re: The Bruno Kucinskas Trilogy - Part I: Phinnaeus Gage on: April 27, 2020, 02:22:03 PM
I didn't know Bruno other then following his posts on Bitcointalk.

It is sad that some of the Bitcoin OGs have fallen victim of scams and even inadvertently and unwillingly participated in them. Leaving them broke in the end.

Certainly one of the most entertaining characters on the forum. (Voted most entertaining person on Bitcointalk 2018).



https://usobit.com/obituaries-2020/04/bruno-kucinskas-jr-march-4-1960-april-8-2020-age-60/



https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5236380.0
13  Economy / Reputation / Re: [Plead] Phinnaeus Gage's User Moniker Manifested Due to a Malignant Brain Tumor on: April 27, 2020, 01:20:18 PM
Bruno was voted most entertaining identity on bitcointalk in a 2018 poll.

Most entertaining person on bitcointalk - POLL - 12 days - 3 votes per member

His accounts are:

YuTü.Co.in
Gleb Gamow
Phinnaeus Gage
14  Other / Ivory Tower / Re: People claiming to be Satoshi (List of Faketoshis) on: April 27, 2020, 01:32:08 AM




Jörg Molt was quickly called out by his ex wife and Andreas Antonopoulos


Craig Steven Wright is discussed here

Debo Jurgen Etienne Guido discussed here

Bilal Khalid(AKA James Caan ) discussed here

Phil Wilson discussed here

Ronald Keala Kua Maria discussed here
15  Other / Ivory Tower / Re: People claiming to be Satoshi (List of Faketoshis) on: April 27, 2020, 01:14:40 AM
<Reserved>
16  Other / Ivory Tower / People claiming to be Satoshi (List of Faketoshis) on: April 27, 2020, 01:14:18 AM
DISCLOSURE: I don't believe any of these people to be Satoshi.



Debo Jurgen Etienne Guido - Belgium - (Copyrighted whitepaper)
Ronald Keala Kua Maria - Hawaii - Claims to be Satoshi but curiously trademarked "Bitcoin Cash"
Jörg Molt - Germany
Craig Steven Wright - Australia / United Kingdom (Copyrighted whitepaper & claims copyright over the bitcoin database)
Bilal Khalid(AKA James Caan ) - Pakistan / United Kingdom
Phil Wilson (aka Scronty) - New Zealand

These are people that have publicly stated that they are Satoshi Nakamoto. Other than Phil Wilson who claims to have worked with Craig Wright all of them claim to have worked independent of each other.

This all started on twitter where a conversation between Arthur van Pelt, Pete Myers and Adam Back came up with a brilliant suggestion:

Quote
They have all called each other frauds.

I would love to see a head to head debate between them chaired by
@adam3us



Have I left off any notable claimants from my list ?

Any suggestions on who should be hosting the event ?
17  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Excuses and minimization offend people on the right side of an argument on: April 23, 2020, 05:34:58 PM

Validation of Wright's evidence is a question for a technical expert. Gavin had sufficient expertise to demand the right things-- he had even previously published a more or less reasonable laundry list-- and he didn't. He also knew enough to know the basic limits of his expertise, such as being unable to determine if a random windows PC had been tampered with. Most importantly, he should have known that he was being asked to participate because his enforcement would be taken as a high degree of assurance, nearly proof, by the media and the public -- and as a result deserved either an appropriately diligent vetting on his part or a refusal to participate if he was unable or uninterested in providing one.

From my perspective it was just another example of a long history of poor judgement.
 
The fact that anyone can be tricked is why it's so much more important for people who will be perceived to be an authority to make an extra effort to not get tricked or just not play along.  So I think here the issue isn't so much that wright tricked him, it's that he shouldn't have been exposed in the first place, and that to this day he still has do little to nothing to walk back the damage.  Wright suckers still continue to cite his equivocation as evidence to support wright. I  think Ver is one of the less ethical people around cryptocurrency, and yet even Ver did better and eventually provided an unequivocated statement against wright's claims.


I have often seen people with a list of "thinks to ask and do" crumble under pressure in court or in a pressure setting. Wright would have known Gavins strong desire for being shown a demonstration of proof. Wright would have carefully spelled out his demands and "walked away" if he felt the ruse wouldn't work due to his demands not being met. With other situations his temper and demeanor resulted in him intimidating others or throwing his toys out of the cot. Gavin appears to be a relatively placid character.

To verify it properly it either needs to be able to pass public scrutiny or requires a "James Randi" of Crypto to verify it properly using carefully prepared tests. The demonstrator should never set the limits or scrutiny of the test.  The test needs to be designed by those that verify it.

Wright has the perfect chance to prove it in the Kleiman and McCormack case. Where the court determines conduct and demeanor. The lawyers and experts will determine the tests.

If he does not utilize the opportunity to prove it then he will still be held liable for his claims. For the case to succeed they do not have to prove that he is or isn't Satoshi. They just have to prove that his conduct means Kleiman is eligible for compensation.

Under "fair comment" McCormack only has to prove that based on the publicly available information that in McCormacks opinion he is not Satoshi.

The BSV camp will try to claim victory while facing complete failure. Because despite the claims that evidence will be provided by Craig that he is Satoshi I am of the opinion that it will not stand up to scrutiny.


this has been discussed o many times and we have made a conclusion that craig is not satoshi but faketoshi. By discussing him again and again we are doing what he exactly want i.e. giving him popularity. so I suggest all members not to discuss this faketoshi.

"I knew Satoshi Nakamoto. Satoshi Nakamoto was a friend of mine. And you Sir are no Satoshi Nakamoto."

https://p2pfoundation.ning.com/friends/SatoshiNakamoto



18  Other / Meta / Re: Are admins of bitcointalk related with satoshi? on: April 16, 2020, 03:04:14 AM

What if @theymos is satoshi...  Roll Eyes

Theymos created the first block explorer. I think that is an accomplishment on its own merits. There are plenty of people around on this forum that are less well known and have made massive contributions to bitcoin and crypto in general.

Just a few of them.
19  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: SCAM: Bitcoin SV (BSV) - fake team member and plagiarized white paper on: April 16, 2020, 02:23:05 AM


Craig Wright on the topic of  Hodling or rather hoedeling as he pronounces it.

"Hoedeling is probably the most despicable evil thing you can do with bitcoin"

Says the the man who claims to control the bitcoins mined by Satoshi that have never been moved.


https://twitter.com/i/status/1250595473368338432

UPDATE:



CSW appears to have been banned from Twetch
20  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] [BSV] [Bitcoin SV] Original Satoshi Vision on: April 11, 2020, 01:06:04 PM
(I wonder after how many days I must rather update / edit my old posts or can create a new one?)


Unofficial list of (official) Bitcointalk.org rules, guidelines, FAQ
32. Posting multiple posts in a row (excluding bumps and reserved posts by the thread starter) is not allowed.
13. Bumps, "updates" are limited to once per 24 hours.
21. Old bumps should be deleted. [2]

[2] Bumps are limited to once per day (24 hours), yes this includes "updates", that's what the edit button is for. Old bumps should be deleted as they serve no purpose, and only clutter up topics and make it more annoying to read.

So the answer is - You must edit every time. There is no time limit.
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 ... 119 »
Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!