741
|
Bitcoin / Group buys / Re: KNC Miner [NEPTUNE 3000GHS] GROUP BUY ALL SOLDOUT
|
on: April 10, 2014, 10:44:36 AM
|
does anyone else in the group buy feels that we should consider a refund? Better miners is being presented NOW by other companies. For what i am concerned , with the amount of a share i can get ghs now instead of a june promise (long live Q1)
I'm not part of the group buy but with the latest KNC stunts I'd suggest asking for a refund ASAP and investing into a few gridseed dual miner blades (80 chip, 5.2mh/s, 140w, 3000 usd). Either that or getting a lot of GTX 750 Ti 2gb cards would be the best choice imho.
|
|
|
742
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] AIDEN | First Crypto to use Scrypt-OG (Optimized for GPU) [altaccept.com]
|
on: April 10, 2014, 10:25:34 AM
|
How much you earn Mh per card 280X asus? I earn 7.6 MH per card
thats extremely good. Most people including me are getting around 6.7 - 7mh. What are your settings? setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1 del *.bin Color 0A sgminer --nfactor 6 -o stratum+tcp://adn.minebig.com:3399 -u xxxxx -p xxxxx --lookup-gap 2 --thread-concurrency 8192 -g 2 -I 13 -w 256 --auto-fan --temp-target 65 --gpu-memclock 1800 --gpu-engine 1125 --expiry 1 --scan-time 1 --queue 0 --gpu-powertune -20 Nice, I'll try higher memclock then...mine was at 7.3mh/s with a hefty oc. Looks like the dump and fall of the coin has already started. Didn't expect it to happen this early...
You mean regular scrypt coins?
|
|
|
754
|
Bitcoin / Group buys / Re: KNC Miner [NEPTUNE 3000GHS] GROUP BUY ALL SOLDOUT
|
on: April 08, 2014, 02:43:59 PM
|
At this point in time I'd ask for a refund and invest into something else...BTC mining isn't looking good and KNC lost their good reputation with how they've been acting lately.
The Titan might be a viable option IF they deliver it relatively on schedule.
|
|
|
758
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] Primecoin GPU miner: up to 1.4 chains / day on a single 280x
|
on: April 07, 2014, 03:30:54 PM
|
Hi,
I would like to try this on a rig with 2X 280x so I need 2 licence i suppose?
I have a celeron cpu on this rig, will I be able to reach max performance of my 2 280x?
You need better processor to achieve max performance. i5+ Even a AMD Phenom I or Phenom II or Core2 Quad is better than a Celeron. Or even a 1st gen Core i5. Has anyone tested out if overclocking/underclocking the core clock and/or memory on gpu's have any impact on performance? Underclocking memory doesn't impact perf much if at all...core speed needs to be maxed out (as much as thermals and stability permit) Cpu core clock doesn't do much, I was at 4ghz and have better perf at 3.6ghz (stock). Stability is more important, and a good ISP and low latency.
|
|
|
759
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] [MYR] Myriad - Multi Algo - SHA or Scrypt or Qubit or Skein or Groestl
|
on: April 07, 2014, 11:27:11 AM
|
you miss the point entirely.
do what u want i said what needed to be said
regardless im still holding on to my 3mili MYR.
Nothing you said needed to be said. You are trying to advocate for the accommodation of criminal activity, by pointing out that someone else is doing something criminal, albeit completely unrelated to the activity you wish to support. I'm glad you're supporting Myr, but I don't agree with your assertions. It's one thing to advocate for CPU miners, it's something else entirely to advocate for bot herders, and then blame the NSA for giving them access to infected machines. It's just a bullshit rationale and you know it. It needed to be said because I felt it needed to be said. CPU miners are a group of people too. And I thought my rushed explanato on how Bitcoin has taken a profound role as another check and balance would be known by members of the community allowing me to take another step forward past the increased security and inclusiveness of the coin and explain a side benefit on a larger scale in freedom and privacy this could bring. The NSA is responsible for forcing companies to use much weaker security and even leave backdoors open. How you are in dispute with that blows my mind. How can you not understand this. It is shocking to me how someone can be a member of this community and be so closed minded and unwilling to even try to understand others perspectives. Idk why I am replying as your response will likely confirm this. I find it rather depressing as I hold the bitcoin community in such high regard. We all know the NSA and other groups are behind the backdoors found in intel cpus for example, but that doesn't mean they are to blame for botnets, which was how your post came through, apparently finding a justification for botnet users, which still are criminals and are the ones to blame for taking advantage of people's 'not so safe' cpus.
|
|
|
|