You guys really suck at PR. There has been many claims of the code not being original and were backed up with solid proofs, how would you answer them? Does John even care to save the coin's rep?
Again, code is open source and even if you can't read any code, why do you think the code isn't original when:
-Only coin other than Bitcoin that only requires 1 confirmation on Poloniex - I've posted many times how to test this.
-Only coin that has staking mobile wallets that allow you to move your wallet.dat to your PC from your Android and iOS wallets
-Only coin with near-instant 0-confirmation transactions that doesn't use master nodes. You can receive node incentives if you have 10,000 in collateral, but collateral is not necessary to be a super peer. You just need an open VNL port, a certain amount of uptime, and possibly a certain amount of bandwidth.
-Only coin that has encrypted connections and gives you a random port if you have no config.dat. All your ISP will see is normal SSL traffic while monitoring your ports, which is unlike what happens with all other coins. If you're using Bitcoin and your ISP monitors your ports, it will know you're using port 8333,
which means it knows you're using Bitcoin.
You're talking about the updates that were pushed on later. Clearly John is a great coder.
I was talking about the basic code that he started with. Code reviews pointed out the fact that it wasn't built from the ground up as John claimed.
The fact that the coin was "built from scratch" was what drew most of supporters to it in the first place..
Show Posts
