What version of miner you're use? On latest 0.10.3.1 for my AMD 580 card this options work: --clk_core_mhz=1250 --clk_core_mv=937 --clk_mem_mhz=2250 --clk_mem_mv=850 And it's only for Windows as I know. And I use latest AMD driver.
|
|
|
What percent of rejected shares you have? Not percent that showed by miner. Just take all rejected shares and divide by all shares and multiply by 100. Currently running at 0.54% rejected. What do you think. Too Hight ? No, it's not too high... But TR even on nicehash gives only 0.3%. You mine not on nicehash? No, I use ethermine. Started with them way back from day one. Once I find something that works I usually stay with it. But, if there is sufficient reason to change I will always. Nicehash just usual have more rejects than other pools. So PM on nicehash gives more than 0,5% rejected shares. For me difference between PM and TR in speed not so big as difference in rejected shares. TR is uses less power then. And TR didn't depends on driver versions - it works on any.
|
|
|
just use latest drivers but you should use nbminer much better , pheonix is a bit crap now dont support new rtx cards a lot of it is buggy plus the hashrate reporting is dubious on it too , they need whole new upgrade on it really used to be good but theres much better out there now.
Yea, I've see a lot of reports about those type cards and issues. Fortunately for me, I started mining years ago and got all AMD cards at a pretty good price back then and those were some of the first cards Phoenix supported. So it seems for those cards most all the bugs were eliminated a long time ago. For me I don't have any of the issues reported by other cards, and I don't plan on purchasing any more cards at this point. Thanks for commenting.. What percent of rejected shares you have? Not percent that showed by miner. Just take all rejected shares and divide by all shares and multiply by 100. Currently running at 0.54% rejected. What do you think. Too Hight ? No, it's not too high... But TR even on nicehash gives only 0.3%. You mine not on nicehash?
|
|
|
just use latest drivers but you should use nbminer much better , pheonix is a bit crap now dont support new rtx cards a lot of it is buggy plus the hashrate reporting is dubious on it too , they need whole new upgrade on it really used to be good but theres much better out there now.
Yea, I've see a lot of reports about those type cards and issues. Fortunately for me, I started mining years ago and got all AMD cards at a pretty good price back then and those were some of the first cards Phoenix supported. So it seems for those cards most all the bugs were eliminated a long time ago. For me I don't have any of the issues reported by other cards, and I don't plan on purchasing any more cards at this point. Thanks for commenting.. What percent of rejected shares you have? Not percent that showed by miner. Just take all rejected shares and divide by all shares and multiply by 100.
|
|
|
Sorry, I'm using TM miner. It uses less power with a little bit slower speed.
|
|
|
What about -clgreen 1 ? Why my RX 580 8Gb ignores it? Latest 21.8.1 driver.
-clgreen 1 is currently not supported. Why would you like to trade higher hashrate for lower power consumption and lower hashrate at the current ETH prices? I just try to find best hashrate with best power consumption... F.e. TR miner uses 4% less power with 1.2% less hashrate in compare with PM for my RX 580 8Gb cards. I wanted to try PM with clgreen kernels. Maybe with them it can be better than TR. PM make more rejected shares on nicehash than TR.
|
|
|
What about -clgreen 1 ? Why my RX 580 8Gb ignores it? Latest 21.8.1 driver.
|
|
|
I think that clgreen work only up to some DAG number. Now I mine on DAG #434 (4.48Gb). And I use latest 21.8.1 driver. Maybe clgreen works only on several set of drivers.
clgreen is incompatible wit clkernel 3. clkernel 3 overrides clgreen. I tried clgreen with all possible kernels - 1,2,3. Always miner shows that GPU ignores clgreen 1.
|
|
|
I think that clgreen work only up to some DAG number. Now I mine on DAG #434 (4.48Gb). And I use latest 21.8.1 driver. Maybe clgreen works only on several set of drivers.
|
|
|
Thanks! Without clgreen speed faster? More power uses?
|
|
|
I am highly pleased with the new 5.7b release. Absolutely no issues with the upgrade and my overall hash rate went from 166.75 to 167.25. I am using the -clKernel 3 settings and -clgreen. I have 5 Radeon RX580 4GB Cards. I mine ETC. Thanks Phoenix for the new code.
Can you post starting of mining screen until DAG generated? Here it is. One exception, I had turned -clgreen off in this run. Not enough. Didn't see what clkernel you're use. This line is after completing DAG building. And please with clgreen option. For me clgreen didn't work. Miner says that GPU0 ignores clgreen 1. I want to figure out why.
|
|
|
I am highly pleased with the new 5.7b release. Absolutely no issues with the upgrade and my overall hash rate went from 166.75 to 167.25. I am using the -clKernel 3 settings and -clgreen. I have 5 Radeon RX580 4GB Cards. I mine ETC. Thanks Phoenix for the new code.
Can you post starting of mining screen until DAG generated?
|
|
|
PhoenixMiner 5.7b is officially released. You can find the download link and the checksums in the first post of this thread.
It is the same release as the one that was posted here as beta version, so if you are already running it, there is no need to upgrade.
Note that 5.7b supports the latest AMD Windows drivers 21.8.1 but it doesn't support the latest AMD Linux drivers 21.30. If you have AMD 6x00 card and you want to use Linux, you should use AMD drivers 21.20 but for any older AMD cards, you should stick with AMD drivers 20.30 (the latest stable PAL drivers without bugs).
Why -clgreen 1 didn't work? Miner just write that GPU0 is ignore -clgreen 1 option. Polaris cards RX 580 8Gb.
|
|
|
Why -clgreen 1 didn't work?
Miner just write that GPU0 is ignore -clgreen 1 option. Polaris cards RX 580 8Gb.
|
|
|
lolMiner 1.30. Windows 10 21H1 AMD 21.6.2 drivers. RX 580 8Gb cards.
Miner starts, write "Setup miner..." and than closes. Nicehash pool. Log file is empty. 0 bytes.
1.28a works.
Command line in bat:
lolMiner.exe --algo ETHASH --pool !POOL! --user !WALLET! --log --ethstratum=ETHV1 timeout 10
|
|
|
Anybody knows why TR miner on Polaris cards (470/480/570/580/590) builds DAG so long? TR miner build it in about 12-13 sec. on my 580 8Gb cards. 1st of all I'm thought that it's only 1st time after launching (cache, etc.). But every time when DAG changes it take so long as at launch. But other miners (Claymore, lol, Phoenix) builds DAG about 7-8 seconds.
Well, we just got tired of reports of aggressive (and in some aspects suboptimal) Polaris straps that caused the DAG build read/write pattern to crash gpus, so we defaulted to a very slow and safe version. For continuous ethash mining it's 4-5 secs extra every 4.5 days, 0.0016% penalty, but naturally worse if you switch between epochs more often for some reason, or crash every 2-3h and restart the miner. I honestly don't remember exactly what type of cap we ended up with, but try adding --eth_dag_slowdown=0 and check the DAG build time. Oh, sorry. I didn't read usage.txt. Thanks for an option - I will try different variants of it. EDIT: With -eth_dag_slowdown=0 DAG creation time decreased to 8.8 sec. It's faster but still slower than other miners (7.8-8.0 sec.). I'm use nicehash - his pool often changes DAG's, so for me DAG rebuilding time is important...
|
|
|
Anybody knows why TR miner on Polaris cards (470/480/570/580/590) builds DAG so long? TR miner build it in about 12-13 sec. on my 580 8Gb cards. 1st of all I'm thought that it's only 1st time after launching (cache, etc.). But every time when DAG changes it take so long as at launch. But other miners (Claymore, lol, Phoenix) builds DAG about 7-8 seconds.
|
|
|
The new features in this release (since 5.6b) are: - Lower percent of rejected/stale shares when mining on Nicehash
I didn't noticed any reduction of rejected shares on nicehash. Still about 1,2-1,5%. And another one: I noticed that TR miner uses about 1-2W of power less than PM on Polarises 8Gb cards. And it's only reported by sensors.
|
|
|
It's strange but fact - PM gives much more rejected shares on nicehash than TR miner. TR miner - about 0.3%, PM - about 1.15-1.25% This nullifies some speed advantage of PM.
|
|
|
Never mind. 5.6a does not support new AMD 21.4.1 drivers.
|
|
|
|