Show Posts
|
Pages: [1] 2 »
|
This looks like good news for crypto altogether, but unfortunately may still affect the entire planet's finances. Banks in the United States are run by overpaid lobbyist morons and are just plain old undeserving greedy control freaks. The banker from Mary Poppins looks like a Saint compared these schmucks. https://moneymorning.com/2018/04/04/the-chart-the-wall-street-journal-doesnt-want-you-to-see/I know this is a semi-old article, but the Business Insider articles that are describing more recent news (today) for this I can't read, and I could care less about their adblock subscription crap.
|
|
|
Bankera deceived everyone. They collected money, lowered the price to the floor and is not clear what they are doing now. Fact on the face. This is a scam project, I do not advise anyone to invest money in it, you will lose it.
i was bought this shit and i agree with you. but i still hold. keep in mind that cryptocurrency "investments" if you really want to call them that are the equivalent of the era of the Gold Rush during the Wild West in United States history. All cryptos are down, all of them. Take a look at the original Bitcoin... 20k at 4th quarter 2017, down to below 7k now. If anything, the lows present a good opportunity for buying. Also, relying on the bitcoinforums or ANY forum for crypto investment advice is like trying to ask horses at the racetrack which one of them is going to win. You won't get a good answer from any of them, just a bunch of snorts and farts. I think the bitcointalk forum is pretty good for dealing with code problems devs are having, but as far as reliable investment advice goes, do you really think the 49ers of the Gold Rush era relied on complete strangers for advice? No... they took their chances with "California or bust" attitudes. So... build a couple full nodes of some coins that you find interesting, read the forums (here or wherever) that have info about code development. Read the debug files from those full nodes and get a handle on how the system works first. If you don't have time to approach it that way, then investing in cryptocurrencies is like playing slots at the casino. You never know when it's gonna hit, but it eventually hits, just maybe not for you. The cryptocurrency era may eventually fade away like the dot com boom, and only a few strong developers will survive, as it evolves into something completely different.
|
|
|
moris1987 (mor buhbut) is a terrorist. The only reason his facebook page says he is friends with the Israel Defense Forces is because he is handing off any useful information he gets from their facebook page to terrorist organizations around the world. If he doesn't have to back up any of his claims with evidence, then why should I? https://he-il.facebook.com/mor.buhbut.37
|
|
|
So if you dont care that means you didnt invest into this scam shitcoin and you are just a paid guy from India.
I'm sorry, but I can't read anything you are saying, my browser just says it's bullshit spam. I can only see that you posted something to the forum and that's it.
|
|
|
I really don't see why anyone would listen to anything anyone had to say that didn't provide any proof one way or another. I'm not defending BNK, or supporting them, I just find these 2 numb nuts (morris1987 and james_fusker) to be quite strange. Their lack of intellect is very obvious in the way they post. I figure moris1987 is paying James_Fusker to spam this thread. Once he stops getting paid, he won't waste his time. I realize people gotta make a living somehow, but I haven't seen either one them say anything intelligent. Only an idiot would listen to them regardless of whether their advice supports or denounces anything in life... It's like I said, learn how to use a linux server (CLI only), build nodes, with output going to a file that you can parse, buy some cheap mining equipment to test, set up OpenNMS and poll the device to see what kind of information you get, then poll the full nodes to see what kind of information you get there, Use some blockchain analysis tools like this one: https://github.com/jkthompson/block-chain-analyticsI imagine these two idiots couldn't build a full node of any cryptocurrency if their lives depended on it. Come on you morons, build a full Ethereum node and grow a brain, or better yet, go step in front of a lorry and make the world a better place. The air would clearer and the world would be 2 car lengths up in traffic on their way to work in the morning. if you are really smart as you are claiming open the shit road map picture and you will find it is enough clue that those scammer are scamming people I wasn't claiming anything so don't put words in my mouth you assumptive jack2ss, and I could give 2 sh!ts about anything you or moris1987 have to say. I'm not going to look at anything because I don't care.
|
|
|
I really don't see why anyone would listen to anything anyone had to say that didn't provide any proof one way or another. I'm not defending BNK, or supporting them, I just find these 2 numb nuts (morris1987 and james_fusker) to be quite strange. Their lack of intellect is very obvious in the way they post. I figure moris1987 is paying James_Fusker to spam this thread. Once he stops getting paid, he won't waste his time. I realize people gotta make a living somehow, but I haven't seen either one them say anything intelligent. Only an idiot would listen to them regardless of whether their advice supports or denounces anything in life... It's like I said, learn how to use a linux server (CLI only), build nodes, with output going to a file that you can parse, buy some cheap mining equipment to test, set up OpenNMS and poll the device to see what kind of information you get, then poll the full nodes to see what kind of information you get there, Use some blockchain analysis tools like this one: https://github.com/jkthompson/block-chain-analyticsI imagine these two idiots couldn't build a full node of any cryptocurrency if their lives depended on it. Come on you morons, build a full Ethereum node and grow a brain, or better yet, go step in front of a lorry and make the world a better place. The air would clearer and the world would be 2 car lengths up in traffic on their way to work in the morning.
|
|
|
with all respect guys ... can someone tell me . if bankera that good why its in the bottom now on coinmarket ?
@james_fuster keep in mind that cryptocurrency "investments" if you really want to call them that are the equivalent of the era of the Gold Rush during the Wild West in United States history. To answer your question as best as possible... All cryptos are down, all of them. Take a look at the original Bitcoin... 20k at 4th quarter 2017, down to below 7k now. If anything, the lows present a good opportunity for buying. Also, relying on the bitcoinforums or ANY forum for crypto investment advice is like trying to ask horses at the racetrack which one of them is going to win. You won't get a good answer from any of them, just a bunch of snorts and farts. I think the bitcointalk forum is pretty good for dealing with code problems devs are having, but as far as reliable investment advice goes, do you really think the 49ers of the Gold Rush era relied on complete strangers for advice? No... they took their chances with "California or bust" attitudes. So... build a couple full nodes of some coins that you find interesting, read the forums (here or wherever) that have info about code development. Read the debug files from those full nodes and get a handle on how the system works first. If you don't have time to approach it that way, then investing in cryptocurrencies is like playing slots at the casino. You never know when it's gonna hit, but it eventually hits, just maybe not for you. The cryptocurrency era may eventually fade away like the dot com boom, and only a few strong developers will survive, as it evolves into something completely different.
|
|
|
@find_ico --- awesome, thanks for the info links. This is good stuff.
@vinicdemorais --- BINANCE
@everyone else -- Don't feed the trolls. they can be burned alive with UV lights and are as useful as North Korean politicians at a Southern Baptist Fund Raiser.
|
|
|
Ok... I spoke to soon. Even after compiling with boost 1.64 as shown below, the solarisd -daemon runs, but when I change the masternode.conf and solaris.conf file according to the published instructions, it still doesn't work. -------begin CLI commands entered snippett------------- git clone https://github.com/Solaris-Project/Solaris/cd Solaris/ sudo mkdir /boost164 && sudo chmod -R a+rwx /boost164 && wget https://sourceforge.net/projects/boost/files/boost/1.64.0/boost_1_64_0.tar.bz2 && tar -xvf boost_1_64_0.tar.bz2 && cd boost_1_64_0/ && ./bootstrap.sh && ./b2 --prefix=/boost164 cxxflags=-fPIC cflags=-fPIC link=static install cd .. ./autogen.sh ./configure --with-boost=/boost164/ LDFLAGS="-L/boost164/lib/" CPPFLAGS="-I/boost164/include" --with-incompatible-bdb make V=1 -j4 ---------end CLI commands entered snippett------------ then I can run the daemon fine till I try to alter the masternode.conf and solaris.conf file according to the instructions and I still get the same error below. I tried it with one master node setup in .conf files, both of them and nothing works, the daemon just crashes. Anybody got a clue on this? ~$ /home/host/Solaris/src/solarisd -daemon ************************ EXCEPTION: N5boost16exception_detail10clone_implINS0_19error_info_injectorINS_16bad_lexica l_castEEEEE bad lexical cast: source type value could not be interpreted as target solaris in AppInit() THANK YOU!!!!! I will recompile with a local version I have for another node.!!!!! THANK YOU!!!!!!!! The error you have is because you used the wrong version of boost. Please use boost 1.63 or greater. Hey dev. Masternode setup does not work. I'm on the latest greatest code because my blockchain updates when I run ./solarisd -daemon, but masternode setup is broken. If people knew that anyone running VSphere could open up a console session and watch you setup your VPS live, you would all use your own servers for masternodes behind your own public IP address (preferably static), especially with the threats of meltdown and spectre, and NO.... don't believe the hype... There are no real fixes other than waiting until new hardware comes out that fixes this problem. But back to the masternode problem. This is the second time I've posted this and apparently there is nothing but noobs on this forum.
I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 LTS 64 bit server edition with boost 1.58 My solarisd -daemon runs fine without masternode setup. Ports are routed at my enterprise edge and allowed on the servers. I deposited 1000 solaris into 2 different addresses on my wallet where I'm running ./solarisd -daemon Then I waited for 120 confirmations (and it's WAY past 120 at this point) before trying to setup a masternode.
I'm using CLI only and was able to retrieve all the information in the PDF instructions via ./solaris-cli commands for the masternode.conf and solaris.conf file.
I try to start ./solarisd -daemon with the masternode.conf and solaris.conf file altered the way the instructions for the VPS show, using my external address as my external address in the solaris.conf file.
I've tried setting up both masternodes (since I have 2 labels, one for each masternode), and just one of them by commenting out the info for the second masternode and nothing works.
I don't want to use a VPS because I don't trust any server I can't get my hands on myself due to the threats of meltdown and spectre.
I want to use a server at my public IP address on the same node as my solarisd -daemon.
Is what I'm doing possible, or do I need to spin up a separate instance of solarisd -daemon, one for each masternode.
The instructions don't work when trying to substitute my public IP address, or 127.0.0.x for the localhost the solarisd -daemon resides on, or any other combination of the localhost IP(s), i.e. 127.0.0.1, 127.0.0.2, and/or my public IP address, or the actual LAN IP address (in which all are static, with the exception of using 127.0.0.1 and 127.0.0.2 per the old solaris master blob talking about the start many <alias> process which uses 127.0.0.1 and 127.0.0.2 in the instructions.)
Any idea why I keep getting this regardless of what I do?
Once I've altered the masternode.conf and solaris.conf file per the directions with the proper IPs (and like I said, I've tried 127.0.0.1 and the LAN IP the host is assigned with for the masternode.conf file), I try to start ./solarisd -daemon at the command line, and this happens. I don't even get a chance to try and type: ./solaris-cli masternode start-alias <alias-name>. the daemon crashes and spits out the following message.
---begin CLI snippet----
************************ EXCEPTION: N5boost16exception_detail10clone_implINS0_19error_info_injectorINS_16bad_lexica l_castEEEEE bad lexical cast: source type value could not be interpreted as target solaris in AppInit()
----end CLI snippet-----
I'm very well versed in networking and can do some debugging with google at my side, so if you need to use some tech lingo, go for it. I'll know what you are talking about, and if not, I'll google whatever term it is I'm missing.
|
|
|
THANK YOU!!!!! I will recompile with a local version I have for another node.!!!!! THANK YOU!!!!!!!! The error you have is because you used the wrong version of boost. Please use boost 1.63 or greater. Hey dev. Masternode setup does not work. I'm on the latest greatest code because my blockchain updates when I run ./solarisd -daemon, but masternode setup is broken. If people knew that anyone running VSphere could open up a console session and watch you setup your VPS live, you would all use your own servers for masternodes behind your own public IP address (preferably static), especially with the threats of meltdown and spectre, and NO.... don't believe the hype... There are no real fixes other than waiting until new hardware comes out that fixes this problem. But back to the masternode problem. This is the second time I've posted this and apparently there is nothing but noobs on this forum.
I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 LTS 64 bit server edition with boost 1.58 My solarisd -daemon runs fine without masternode setup. Ports are routed at my enterprise edge and allowed on the servers. I deposited 1000 solaris into 2 different addresses on my wallet where I'm running ./solarisd -daemon Then I waited for 120 confirmations (and it's WAY past 120 at this point) before trying to setup a masternode.
I'm using CLI only and was able to retrieve all the information in the PDF instructions via ./solaris-cli commands for the masternode.conf and solaris.conf file.
I try to start ./solarisd -daemon with the masternode.conf and solaris.conf file altered the way the instructions for the VPS show, using my external address as my external address in the solaris.conf file.
I've tried setting up both masternodes (since I have 2 labels, one for each masternode), and just one of them by commenting out the info for the second masternode and nothing works.
I don't want to use a VPS because I don't trust any server I can't get my hands on myself due to the threats of meltdown and spectre.
I want to use a server at my public IP address on the same node as my solarisd -daemon.
Is what I'm doing possible, or do I need to spin up a separate instance of solarisd -daemon, one for each masternode.
The instructions don't work when trying to substitute my public IP address, or 127.0.0.x for the localhost the solarisd -daemon resides on, or any other combination of the localhost IP(s), i.e. 127.0.0.1, 127.0.0.2, and/or my public IP address, or the actual LAN IP address (in which all are static, with the exception of using 127.0.0.1 and 127.0.0.2 per the old solaris master blob talking about the start many <alias> process which uses 127.0.0.1 and 127.0.0.2 in the instructions.)
Any idea why I keep getting this regardless of what I do?
Once I've altered the masternode.conf and solaris.conf file per the directions with the proper IPs (and like I said, I've tried 127.0.0.1 and the LAN IP the host is assigned with for the masternode.conf file), I try to start ./solarisd -daemon at the command line, and this happens. I don't even get a chance to try and type: ./solaris-cli masternode start-alias <alias-name>. the daemon crashes and spits out the following message.
---begin CLI snippet----
************************ EXCEPTION: N5boost16exception_detail10clone_implINS0_19error_info_injectorINS_16bad_lexica l_castEEEEE bad lexical cast: source type value could not be interpreted as target solaris in AppInit()
----end CLI snippet-----
I'm very well versed in networking and can do some debugging with google at my side, so if you need to use some tech lingo, go for it. I'll know what you are talking about, and if not, I'll google whatever term it is I'm missing.
|
|
|
Hey dev. Masternode setup does not work. I'm on the latest greatest code because my blockchain updates when I run ./solarisd -daemon, but masternode setup is broken. If people knew that anyone running VSphere could open up a console session and watch you setup your VPS live, you would all use your own servers for masternodes behind your own public IP address (preferably static), especially with the threats of meltdown and spectre, and NO.... don't believe the hype... There are no real fixes other than waiting until new hardware comes out that fixes this problem. But back to the masternode problem. This is the second time I've posted this and apparently there is nothing but noobs on this forum.
I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 LTS 64 bit server edition with boost 1.58 My solarisd -daemon runs fine without masternode setup. Ports are routed at my enterprise edge and allowed on the servers. I deposited 1000 solaris into 2 different addresses on my wallet where I'm running ./solarisd -daemon Then I waited for 120 confirmations (and it's WAY past 120 at this point) before trying to setup a masternode.
I'm using CLI only and was able to retrieve all the information in the PDF instructions via ./solaris-cli commands for the masternode.conf and solaris.conf file.
I try to start ./solarisd -daemon with the masternode.conf and solaris.conf file altered the way the instructions for the VPS show, using my external address as my external address in the solaris.conf file.
I've tried setting up both masternodes (since I have 2 labels, one for each masternode), and just one of them by commenting out the info for the second masternode and nothing works.
I don't want to use a VPS because I don't trust any server I can't get my hands on myself due to the threats of meltdown and spectre.
I want to use a server at my public IP address on the same node as my solarisd -daemon.
Is what I'm doing possible, or do I need to spin up a separate instance of solarisd -daemon, one for each masternode.
The instructions don't work when trying to substitute my public IP address, or 127.0.0.x for the localhost the solarisd -daemon resides on, or any other combination of the localhost IP(s), i.e. 127.0.0.1, 127.0.0.2, and/or my public IP address, or the actual LAN IP address (in which all are static, with the exception of using 127.0.0.1 and 127.0.0.2 per the old solaris master blob talking about the start many <alias> process which uses 127.0.0.1 and 127.0.0.2 in the instructions.)
Any idea why I keep getting this regardless of what I do?
Once I've altered the masternode.conf and solaris.conf file per the directions with the proper IPs (and like I said, I've tried 127.0.0.1 and the LAN IP the host is assigned with for the masternode.conf file), I try to start ./solarisd -daemon at the command line, and this happens. I don't even get a chance to try and type: ./solaris-cli masternode start-alias <alias-name>. the daemon crashes and spits out the following message.
---begin CLI snippet----
************************ EXCEPTION: N5boost16exception_detail10clone_implINS0_19error_info_injectorINS_16bad_lexica l_castEEEEE bad lexical cast: source type value could not be interpreted as target solaris in AppInit()
----end CLI snippet-----
I'm very well versed in networking and can do some debugging with google at my side, so if you need to use some tech lingo, go for it. I'll know what you are talking about, and if not, I'll google whatever term it is I'm missing.
|
|
|
Hey dev. Masternode setup does not work. I waited until the libzerocoin implementation came out before attempting to setup a masternode.
I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 LTS 64 bit server edition My solarisd -daemon runs fine without masternode setup. Ports are routed at my enterprise edge and allowed on the servers. I deposited 1000 solaris into 2 different addresses on my wallet. Then I waited for 120 confirmations (and it's WAY past 120 at this point) before trying to setup a masternode.
I'm using CLI only and was able to retrieve all the information in the PDF instructions via ./solaris-cli commands for the masternode.conf and solaris.conf file.
I've tried setting up both masternodes, 1 masternode... and nothing works.
I don't want to use a VPS because I don't trust any server I can't get my hands on myself.
I want to use a server at my public IP address on the same node as my solaris wallet.
Is what I'm doing possible, or do I need to spin up a separate instance of solarisd -daemon, one for each masternode.
The instructions don't work when trying to substitute my public IP address, or 127.0.0.x for the localhost the solarisd -daemon resides on, or any other combination of the localhost IP(s), i.e. 127.0.0.1, 127.0.0.2, and/or my public IP address.
Any idea why I keep getting this regardless of what I do?
---begin CLI snippet----
************************ EXCEPTION: N5boost16exception_detail10clone_implINS0_19error_info_injectorINS_16bad_lexica l_castEEEEE bad lexical cast: source type value could not be interpreted as target solaris in AppInit()
----end CLI snippet-----
I'm very well versed in networking and can do some debugging with google at my side, so if you need to use some tech lingo, go for it. I'll know what you are talking about.
|
|
|
Hi,
I never setup a Masternode with the old code, just started once I updated to the zXLR code base that was just recently published to github. I followed the instructions posted, but am using my own node, so I set 127.0.0.1 instead of what would be a VPS server at some public IP address. I saw where it said to set externalip=<ipaddress> to this public IP VPS server, but since I'm using the same server, I just set it to 127.0.0.1 in case the setting just needed to be there. Upon restarting the node via the instructions, I got this:
---begin cli output snippet------
************************ EXCEPTION: N5boost16exception_detail10clone_implINS0_19error_info_injectorINS_16bad_lexica l_castEEEEE bad lexical cast: source type value could not be interpreted as target solaris in AppInit()
----end cli output snippet-------
Please keep in mind I'm not using the gui, and was able to get all the information I needed using: ./solaris-cli getnewaddress "<new alias>" ./solaris-cli sendtoaddress "<new address created with new alias> ./solaris-cli listtransactions ./solaris-cli masternode genkey ./solaris-cli masternode outputs nano /home/user/.solaris/solaris.conf nano /home/user/.solaris/masternode.conf ./solaris-cli stop ./solarisd -daemon
I filled out the masternode.conf and solaris.conf file per the instructions as well. Any ideas why this isn't working?
For the alias, I just ran ./solaris-cli getnewaddress "<new alias> to generate a new address, then deposited exactly 1000 xlr and the contents reflect as such. I also let is get more than 219 confirmations as well before attempting to alter the masternode.conf file.
Also... When I comment out the additions for creating the masternode, "solarisd -daemon" starts just fine and my balances are fine as well so that's a relief.
I hope this is obvious as to what I'm missing. Keep in mind, I don't like GUIs period. I'm old school like that. All I have is CLI linux Ubuntu 16.04 LTS loaded.
|
|
|
Raw transaction situation:
I try to send 0.00001000 with fee 0.00000011 (I use one input of 0.00001011)
error: {"code":-26,"message":"66: insufficient priority"}
Finally seems that minimum allowed fee is 0.00001000 for kb
I could send this way:
{ "account" : "", "address" : "zAqG9VXQuAZhmAooSehTo6rkWJF6CSb9w4", "category" : "send", "amount" : -0.00000700, "vout" : 0, "fee" : -0.00000311, "confirmations" : 0, "txid" : "7677ff656c5b772c99df4b0cf56bdf67db6f246f71ef82f7e8da749acc79e4d9", "walletconflicts" : [ ], "time" : 1504997860, "timereceived" : 1504997860 }
But how a POOL can exist if to use one unspent 0.00000001 or 0.00000010 I should pay 0.00000200 of fee? (One unspent is about 200 bytes. ) Now I understand - there are no new blocks since pool (I think zpool) mines it only when there are unconfrmed transtacion in memory.
It was the main idea of coin? To generate only blocks with transactions in it?
Yeah, I may have leapt to the wrong conclusion above... the relay fee is 0.0000100 CHAO (so the sent amount has to be larger than that to have any rationale to send it). Zpool seems to have mined the last five blocks. I think Wmikrut was mining its own private orphaned chain for a bit in the last 24 hrs too. Am I orphaned? I see my wallet height matches https://chainz.cryptoid.info/chao/ within a block or two. If I was orphaned I would think it would be way off. You can pull and rebuild now. I've got my miners pointed your way. should be no need to reindex. Do a "git checkout chainID" just incase. I've switched that to the default branch though. Once im sure we're all on the right fork and working together then ill get a windows client released. Infernoman, I'll check your github tonight and make sure my chain ID is correct and update/reindex/redownload blockchain if required. Yeah... regarding coinmarketcap, I see where it's not listed anymore, even as an inactive coin. I'm sure a lot of the exchange issues can be corrected once everyone is up to par with the new code in order to avoid 51% attack issues in the future. All of these ridiculous ICOs (which seem to be primarily based in PoS) I see with unheard of prices are all volatility price shifts. If there is no converged network to function as transaction processors, regardless of whether you are PoS or PoW, there is no real support for the price swings outside psychological volatility market swings. Reminds me of the volatility of Options contracts and futures in the Wall Street world that co-exists with fiat currency(ies). Thanks, jubei
|
|
|
|