NEO transaction speed is 15 sec (block time) as I said in the first place. I don't make lobby for NEO in here but one major benefit of NEO block chain are TX fees which are 0. Now it all depends what the OP want to accomplish with his cryptocurrency.

If you want a token and you don't have a lot of coding skills, go for Ethereum or NEO - the transactions are confirmed in ~15 secs on both.
If you have some coding skills I suggest to make a fork of a coin like Nano, Stellar (Ripple) (5-10 secs block time), among the fastest around.

I thought that this is the downside of our talk, but thanks to the new bumping algo, this thread doesn't appear on the 1st page of bitcointalk. 

As for joining Discord, no thanks! I know how things works and worked there since the beginning, you get insta ban if you say something that the devs don't like (aka licking asses). This is why only CCZ ships are still in there.

Maybe, but in this 30 month long bearmarket many projects appeared and took a piece of the pie. Ontology is one of them, which took like half of the NEO pie imo.

Don't get me wrong, I don't FUD or anything like this as I hold a bag of NEO still (like 20% of my portfolio) and I would love to see NEO near the ATH in the next year or two, but like you said... I doubt.

This is an option I miss too, but since I use a gaming mouse I've set it to "copy" - "paste" with the side 4th and 5th buttons.
If you don't have a gaming mouse you can try some apps from the web, that do just this, auto copy highlighted text in Windows. Google it.

Sorry about this mate!
Our discussion deviated offtopic without noticing it, when we were discussing why Nano isn't getting the attention it deserves. I'll be more carefully in the future.
Peace!

A video tutorial would be great. I would have done it myself because I am familiar with making videos, but since I never voted in a DAO neither, I can't make it happen. Maybe after a article about the voting mechanism will be out, and I'll try it, I can give it a shot.

Maybe this is the best decision after all. Burning a part of the premine and keeping part for development is not that bad as burning 100% of the coins premined.
By doing this way, the dev is pleasing both sides (the keepers and the burners). I can live with it, even if I am not 100% for it.

Looks like a lot of people are for the use of the coins instead of burning them.
But for the fairness of the proposal, I would suggest @Sherlock to make a poll, in this thread and invite all people from Discord and other communication channels to vote for it.

I don't agree with point 1 - to destroy the tokens. The tokens can be used to fund the development of the project. The fund can be used to pay services, team members, managers, marketers, etc. For example the services you mentioned above nodes, website, etc.

This is my personal opinion.

Cheers and good luck!

I see your point of view: the nodes.

Here is mine: the coins.

Maybe you fixed the node problem pools have, but you have a new problem - all the coins goes now to a single owner, instead of multiple owners. This is why I've said is worst than traditional PoW, instead of a pool getting 50% of mined coins (which will be spread among all individual miners) now we have 1 miner getting 50% of the coins, but we are pool free.

And not to be negligible, with this approach the scenario can go like this: Let's say I mine solo (because there are no pools involved) but since is not profitable for me because 1 single miner gets 50% of all block, I leave. So will do all the small miners, if is not profitable anymore and this will lead him to mine more and more blocks until probably he will mine 100% of the blocks.

Now tell me, where is the decentralization?

I saw this today in Discord that a single address is mining 50% of all blocks, confirmed also by a support member of Luck coin.

What you should do?
My suggestion is not to beg the miner to reduce the number of nodes/miners, but for the dev to find a solution to this issue, since the whole purpose of this coins is now doomed.

"A new consensus algorithm to eliminate large mining pools" - the consensus may be eliminated for the large pools but not for the large miners.

"one-CPU-one-vote" vision - if someone is mining with 1000 CPUs over a 2000 nodes (CPUS) network, this consensus is not better than the clasic POW one, is even worst.

My 2 cents!

Well I prefer to hold these top coins since they are more established, so the risk of loosing my money is lower than with other top 200 coins.
Why I choose them: DASH - because of the very low fees, for any payment in the space. LTC - because BTC is too slow and too expensive. Have other alts from top 50, but I prefer to not shill them in here, the comment from above was purely to give an example even if I hold all of the coins mentioned there.

1) Beggers? Did I asked something (material) from you or Espers? No.
2) I suggest you to watch your language, since I didn't said any offensive words neither to you or Cryptocoderz/Espers.
3) Looks like you can't manage to have a decent discussion (unless is something you want to hear) so I am done with you.

At least Cryptocoderz came in here and gave us some explanations, with calm and appropriate words, but you...

P.S. attacking my posts over the forum with your low quality and offensive posts will only get you banned for trolling.

I can agree with you it was not $200 for no reason, it was because it was a hell of a bullrun, with some projects going even x500.
But.. I don't think NEO will ever touch $200 again since Ontology is now on the game too, I know they complement each other and share the same team under the roof of Onchain but also they split the value of their token.

This being said, I see NEO somewhere above $50 but under $100 in the future. Still have a lot of respect to NEO and ONT and their team, and since they are the Chinese titans I hold a bag of both coins.

Well if you ask me, I think this is normal. Not because of the announcement but because the price went straight up and is normal to bounce back a little bit.
As for the eGLD I can't give you an opinion since I didn't watched the project in depth, I only have a small bag of coins. Is there a link about eGLD token, to give a look? Thanks!

Got it!
Well I am not a native English speaker, To be honest I have searched for "bozoz" my bad
Anyway sorry for the off-topic I now take a step back from this thread because even if it was really funny, I (we) bumped the thread a lot in the last couple of days.
Ciao ciao!

This is all the development that this coin will get in its entire life, changing a logo. The funny thing is that the logos are not even made by the devs, but by the community, so no effort for them, at all.

Btw I got the "CryptoLogoz" one, but not the "CryptoBozoz". Can you explain? LOL

If the question is the the one on the title, well like you already know bullmarket is already here, not as spectacular as the 2017 one but is here, there are some projects out there that did went 20-30x from March dip.

Regarding CZ tweet: I don't see him saying bullmarket is here, he only said:
"We are seeing ATH in terms of system traffic. Higher than Dec 2017. Should be interesting to see what happens next."

Which means only that a lot of people joining his exchange, maybe due to intensive marketing of binance exchange. Nothing more, nothing less.

In my opinion there is no point in reviving a project, no matter what are the conditions it failed. Why? Because if it failed once because team left, developers left (because no one is working for free) why makes me think it won't fail again, if a bear will come after they make the new IEO ITO?

I better put my money in a new coin, rather than a failed-revived project.