 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1]
|
|
Owndata admin, can intro your dev team? ICO without dev team is a big red flag for me
|
|
|
|
AMP will reach 40k in few weeks
Yes for the team to raise a 3rd round campaign sale to scam more people ! They will use their chrome add in to share annoncement and advertise We have no plans for a subsequent funding campaign. Conversely, is there a plan to burn more coins ? Yes. when is the AMP burn happening @Elokane? now could be the right time |
|
|
|
|
Users from the U.S should lodge a police report and also email to SEC for suspicious activities happening with Bittrex lately
|
|
|
|
|
if unsold tokens are burned from 900mill, team will still keep 600mill tokens? or will it be decreased as well?
|
|
|
|
|
total supply of SNT will be 3billion if 300k ether limit reaches
|
|
|
|
|
amp burning is still on @Elokane? if yes, will it be together with the beta news?
|
|
|
|
|
if plugin launch can pump the coin 30% or more, i wud be happy. but i doubt it, i think without burning more amps, it's unlikely we will see a huge increase in the amp prices. most of the early investors are in this project becoz they lost load of money, n they are hoping to somehow get their money back. if i were to invest again, i wudn't touch amp, there are plenty other potential projects that can yield more return. but i'm one of those early investors, unfortunately.
|
|
|
|
AMP will reach 40k in few weeks
Yes for the team to raise a 3rd round campaign sale to scam more people ! They will use their chrome add in to share annoncement and advertise We have no plans for a subsequent funding campaign. Conversely, is there a plan to burn more coins ? Yes. waiting for this... |
|
|
|
|
Any chance project team is doing a video intro/interview to boost an investor confidence? Since you have published pictures and full names of your project team members, I'm guessing video shouldn't a problem?
|
|
|
|
Why has the AMP TEAM decided to wait till January the 20th for a decision on what is to happen to AMP? Are they all on holiday or very busy? Or they want more concensus and feedback from AMP HOLDERS? I grabbed a few from POLO to hold and see what happens.
Pretty much we sitting here holding our dicks in our hands waiting for them to finish having a great holiday with our money. That's the just of it. They need time to come back with a revised product roadmap and business plan (now that Rchain has been separated from Synereo). Revising your business strategy is not as easy as buying and selling a shitcoin in polo and it needs some time, at least few weeks. If they come back before Jan 20 that's great, but if they take until Jan 20, that's reasonable too. You have waited this much, I'm sure you can wait for another month for the team to work on the new plan. Also, giving some fancy name to the product modules (like "Rchain") doesn't make it impossible to do for others (unless it's a novel idea that has been copyrighted), technically there are many ways and workarounds of doing a particular idea. So, I think Rchain portion could potentially still be in in the revised product roadmap, hopefully (we will have to wait and see). |
|
|
|
|
First of all, congrats to Synereo team and board members for making this not easy decision to move on without Greg. All the best to Greg, but I believe this was necessary.
Many people are asking for refunds, these are mostly those who have participated in ICO-2. I'm pretty sure refund is not in the plan, please read the t&cs of the ico-2 agreement. But let's say, refund happens, then it won't be fair to investors who purchased AMPs at the exchanges believing in Synereo's product roadmap and vision? Refunding them is will be almost impossible. Refunding one community and not doing the same for the others will probably make this drama continue further into 2017-2018...
There is one solution I guess that will appease everyone, which was already mentioned a few times by other members, and that is to burn considerable amount of AMPs so that the total supply of AMPs decreases significantly and this would automatically appreciate the value of AMPs that investors (small and big) are holding at the moment.
|
|
|
|
|
Anti virus software flagged and removed the wallet as Trojan.Gen.2, is this normal?
|
|
|
|
So, in summary it's Greg vs Synereo Team (i.e; Dor, Yaniv, R Violini, Noy, Tim, Joeri, Henry, Beerit, Gary, Julian, MJ, Gal). What Greg (CTO) wants: - that Rchain is his proprietary product (and doesn't belong to Synereo)
- that Rchain development should be funded by investors' money
- Dor (CEO) should step down
Since the above points are not being met by the team, he is holding everyone hostage and resorted into 'washing dirty laundy in public' with these videos that has been very damaging to AMP price. I personally think - as AMP holder - that Greg should be fired. While he is a smart individual, it's clearly visible from the videos that his behavior is quite toxic and it's not good for the team. He, with his Rchain should be let go, so that the team can focus back on the work asap and come up with a revised roadmap. For the amount that was raised for ICO2, many other capable coders can be hired and Rchain alternative can be easily developed. |
|
|
|
More than a month ago the ICO price was 33ksat, now the price is 6000sat. How things change very fast in Crypto. I just hope if have seen the end of this dump unless this is going to burn alot of people.
thats what will happen to all alts on btc rally but this amp confuses me, first ico, 2nd ico, etc yes agreed, very confusing. if ico3, are they legally obliged to sell higher than ico2 price to protect ico2 investors? |
|
|
|
First 250 blocks are low reward (1 WRP) to avoid instamine, the algo will start at scrypt-n and change to a custom implementation of LYRA2 at block 500.
to be specific, is it Lyra2RE or Lyra2REv2? |
|
|
|
|
does ccex providing escrow services for this ico? if yes, what are the refund terms?
|
|
|
|
|
