perhaps of concern is the effect of increasing the use of bots with more accurate algorithms. in fact the bot currently still has a weak point and cannot respond to all conditions automatically, it is still limited to tools that cannot handle strong swings, if the bot is not proven to interfere with other stock market activities that are clearly quieter than the crypto market, then there is no need to panic.

The four coins you mentioned will indeed increase strongly, there are some things that I saw during the last bullrun where bch and btg will start the first spark increase after bitcoin, and then followed by the top 5 altcoins at that time. I also consider trx and bnb as new players who will definitely take part in breaking into the top ranking at the same time.

the level of consolidation is still awake and many people want to consider choosing short if the movement starts to slow down, the sudden increase still has a correction threshold, and I think it will at least return to 7800 on the weekly closing chart, or jump directly above 9k, this trend is good enough to enlarge strengthening sentiment and minimizing the possibility to drop below 7k.

if the plustoken party throws all their current eth and converts it to the btc pair and then mixes it back to the other erc20. then we can see the big waves of pump and dump from btc. Things like this still might happen at any time. it is possible not to be frontal just like that, but the possibility of manipulation is still very real on a long-term scale.

projects that are still not in the public offering period, and dare to pay with eth? new projects usually don't have the funds for that. If indeed they are strong in funding and confident in their project then that is a good step to build investor confidence.

Throughout 2017, several big projects do two campaigns at once, pay btc for signatures, and use the stake model for other campaigns, I have never followed the campaign you intended and still think it is just coincidental and temporary.

Manipulation includes fast movements, cannot be considered deceptive because they can be speculative, and TA is also not always about stop loss. I agree with you. Technically, analysis always leads to support and resistance, traders use it to determine the actual price range. If it only refers to patterns that change suddenly due to the influence of BTC activities, it can indeed be excluded, but that is not purely manipulation.

only if altcoin dominance is higher than bitcoin, and even then still have to see a significant increase in bitcoin price, if the positive signal only starts from q4 or not at all, I worry for many new altcoins that have actively fought over the past 2 years, and some exchanges will died this year due to the continued decline in trade volume, and also intense competition in the crypto ecosystem.

if indeed the proposal remains consistent to stay integrated with the Facebook platform, then we only need to continue to monitor their progress. Libra dares to offer something that is very challenging for public space and of course it is very complex. There is no problem about uncertainty because Facebook is a leading company and hasn't even made a public offer that harms anyone.

the trigger for world war is that there is no longer a peaceful path between the two parties who have their respective allies. When discussing continuing tensions between the US and Iran, it will be the same as the previous US and Afghanistan polemic, the impact of the tension does not spread throughout the world. What I read yesterday was the anticipation of the conversion of assets into bitcoin before the tension became more complicated, whatever happened, only to hope to be able to withdraw assets with the same value when finally conditions returned to normal.

The intended coin clearly will never have volume because the developer as the biggest holder is also waiting to sell it all without a buyback clause, if from the start their plan has failed by prioritizing distribution offers that are too large without looking at other aspects that attract market movements, then the coin will deadlocked, of course would be very detrimental to all parties who hold it.

Chinese government sentiment that agreed to implement the blockchain, but did not recognize the crypto currency was interesting enough throughout 2019, and then the topic of institutional funds was actively involved in market trials, and ultimately led to a decline in bitcoin eventually returning to the $ 6k Area. these things are likely to develop again in 2020.

try to calm down until bitcoin goes beyond ATH again, or explain in more detail that this asset is still very speculative and will continue to face periodic challenges to achieve greater potential, so it's not always about high prices, others will continue to make it a joke if you only explains the short-term bitcoin movement. No need to be blamed because their literacy is indeed very weak and always thinks instantaneously in every circumstance.

Cocos is currently trading at 7-8 sats with a very long order queue, and you buy it with 9 sats? hmm, looks like you really want to sell it back at the same price. 1-digit coins are very difficult to develop, except waiting for the altseason to arrive, there are several examples that occur in binance, for example: Dent. in the end the coin shrank to 5 sat and then binance removed the bnb and btc pair for that coin. I think Cocos will experience the same thing.

many projects realize that their budgets can only come in at a small exchange, many developers are too rash in picking up revenue momentum. In many cases, they do not maintain volume and only wait for the movement of their coins in the market. if it is not as expected, it is they who ultimately become the most coin seller at the end of the story, that is the quality that is happening right now.

Remains dependent on daily volume and is connected to the main market that trades the coin. Quality is more important because prices always adjust to BTC trends. If apart from the things I mentioned means it requires a different strategy because the coin volume tends to be very low, it takes longer to see profits because it will only monitor how much the quality of activity of their community, and also the development of the project.

it's better to bet or trade margins, even though the risk is the same but the process and results are not controlled by others. unfortunately the comments about Miracletele above once held a campaign on this forum, need to be more careful to follow many things so far this year. Ponzi has always been unable to avoid bottlenecks because it only relies on new user investment networks, and also HYIPs that promise high monthly profits, but end up with fraud.

Many investors want their ICO investment to finally enter the famous exchange. while many projects are not sufficiently capable or have other plans. Over time many investors are no longer interested and then have a negative impact on the next ICO wave. finally all the potential ico and ico scams are in the same room and are swept away by a deteriorating reputation.

if the participant leaves the campaign abruptly and unconsciously follows a good campaign with the same manager a few months later, there will be no difference.

Important points remain in the promised distribution, stake is not very influential, especially if the manager handling the bounty has a good reputation, their weaknesses are not because they are lazy, but focus not only on one campaign and also not hiring teams to help make management more efficient.

the problem with cex is that they are familiar with hacking attack activities, and conversely the problem with dex is liquidity and budget capacity. most of dex was closed in 2019 because they could not deal with regulations, this is also likely to happen in 2020. Nothing is certain at this time, and most importantly, how each exchange is able to maintain consistent performance that ensures users feel they remain comfortable using the services provided.

means their mode is a kind of keylogging / hijack. I also found this add-on this morning, but didn't use it, I don't like to do experiments and only use important add-ons from the official website. Just like Playstore, it takes several days or several reports to delete it, Google does not filter it directly.