"https://twitter.com/x_matsuno"

"
情報を広めないのは非中央集権ではない。そのジレンマをいまだに突破できないでいるのはわかるが、優位な情報を公開できない環境を作っている組織、知っているメンバーは同罪。実行できないジレンマもわかる。しかしその責任の重みから目をそらすなら繁栄はしないだろうと思う。結局中央集権の言いなり
"

Translated with DeepL.com (free version)

Non-disclosure of information is not decentralisation. I know you are still not able to break through this dilemma, but organisations that create an environment that prevents the release of beneficial information and members who know about it are equally guilty. I also understand the dilemma of not being able to implement it. But I don't think we will succeed if we turn a blind eye to the burden of this responsibility. Ultimately, we are at the mercy of centralised power.

Interesting point of view.
Unfortunately, opinion and facts do not quite coincide here.
Take Xarcade, for example. Started with a lot of hype, but in all these years it hasn't really got its act together.
XPX has its problems, but as a sidechain of NEM/XYM, well, who knows. Instead of tearing each other apart, they should join forces???

Perhaps I should have written " One of the forums that cannot be closed by individuals simply, without cause, for personal motives and without the consent of the community " ...
would certainly have been a better choice of words.

sry

https://twitter.com/TrendStream/status/1672850723778985984?cxt=HHwWgIDQkdi3lLcuAAAA

" ハチェットがいつ来日するかわからんけど、京都の #IVSCrypto に参加してみてほしい。それで日本のクリプト熱量を感じてもらって、その中にいかに #Symbol が食い込めてないか、また食い込む必要があるのかないのか、自分の五感で体感してほしさある。かなり。 "


" I don't know when Hatchett is coming to Japan, but I want him to attend #IVSCrypto in Kyoto. I want you to feel the crypto fever in Japan and experience with your five senses how #Symbol is not included in it, and whether it needs to be included or not. Quite a lot. "
(DeepL)

mmmhhh ...

" https://twitter.com/NCOSIGIMCITYNRE/status/1666377837333434369?cxt=HHwWgsC-_Y30lKAuAAAA "

Correct, @gimre .

The problem is that you are talking about a condition but not about the causes that led to that condition.

thx

Hey, welcome back, I wouldn't call it active now. But it is perhaps one of the last open threads with the history of NEM that new core developers cannot easily influence.



thx

To the point. I couldn't have put it better myself.

thx

Fits the discussion quite well.

" https://twitter.com/0x6861746366574/status/1654353376229081091?cxt=HHwWhoDSsa3ouPUtAAAA "

" Protocols that launch with a 20-50% allocation to the “founding team” will be dead in 2-3 years.
   Wealth inequality is a sticking point: no one wants to build on a chain where a significant portion of the money belongs to a few.
   People want to feel like they’re equal. That’s half the reason #NEM was successful early on: because wealth was “evenly distributed”, in the beginning. "

" https://twitter.com/0x6861746366574/status/1654392014409199616?cxt=HHwWgMDTobKxyvUtAAAA "

" I have been thinking about a mosaic-based authentication system for Discord, similar to the verification systems used in NFT communities and by bots such as http://collab.land.
   You would give a user a non-transferrable, revokable mosaic that would allow them access to a Discord server. A Discord bot would have you sign a message, and verify the contents of your address before
   letting you enter.

  This would be a fantastic system to roll out for the new
  @SymbolSyndicate
  Discord, and allow us to work closer with a trusted circle of the community and our users on solving issues that affect the entire protocol (such as Bithumb, or the finalization hiccup) without exposing the
  information to the broader public or blaring it out through tweets. "


In my opinion, two statements that contradict each other. Certainly, there will always be an internal exchange of opinions between certain people, but information should be freely available to all who want to participate in a decentralised network. Equality should also apply to access to information. And not only for a narrow circle.
Doesn't every node operator or investor in a decentralised network have the right to important information concerning the entire protocol?
Once again, this seems to be more about control and not about better cooperation.

thx

----------------
... I'll cut it short and confine myself to a few points.

" Own node is useful for connecting your wallet through it.
  Even if it is not rewarded by the supernode program. It's +1 for work security. "

This is certainly correct, but does not correspond to reality. NIS started the testing phase in 2014 and the smallest part of the users has operated their own node since that time. And this despite the fact that there was enough support and setting up a node is not rocket science. And this will not change in the coming years. Everything else is wishful thinking. We all  should learn from the past.

" In addition, the supernode program allows you to monitor the technical parameters of your node. "

For someone starting out running a node, this may be true. Everyone else should be able to monitor their node differently. This program is only for control to prevent misuse. But even this SN program has its flaws.

" It is good to run your own node to support the NEM network.
  If I have some XEM, I'm interested in the stability of the NEM network.
  Even if there was no supernode program, I would still run a 24/7 NIS node. "

Unfortunately, the people who ran these nodes and, above all, supported the NEM network were portrayed as greedy idiots.
It is also interesting to see how the nodes in the symbol network are declining more and more. Has halved since launch if I got that right?
People need an incentive to do something, it always has been and it will never change. And the current NIS SN program is just the opposite.

" The crypto and the state are fundamentally incompatible phenomena. "

Nonsense. Unfortunately there is no common lobby, this is the general problem. Then you would have more influence on certain decisions. Crypto is here to improve people's lives.


Actually, you only have to look at the number of participants. Less than 60 people. That says it all.

Why would anyone run such a node under the current conditions ?
Not only does the 24 XEM per day, if everything goes well, not cover the expenses for the server. Furthermore, the operation of a node(POS) is now classified as a business in some countries.
This means that additional, not inconsiderable costs are incurred. Even if you had no server costs. Not to mention the 10,000 XEM that are then also subject to business tax.  


thx

----------

PS

Maybe you know a few reasons?  @gimre ...
(  However, there will probably only be " I love you too. " will be the answer.  ... ¯\_(ツ)_/¯   )

Please describe what you mean by this statement. And what were your conclusions ? What did you find out in your studies?
thx

Mmmhh, your account looks more like a BOT here.
You have the option to send a message from your Nemesis account. You have not done this yet. This account has been linked to your name for many years.

Are you then who you say you are? mmmmhhhh.... You certainly don't need a nem admin here. The data is on the network. Freely accessible for everyone.

thx

I'm not sure what you need a NEM administrator for ?
But since I don't know the full story, it's difficult to form an opinion.
The last transaction from the account you used for your 1.5 stakes went out in March 2021.
Since you linked this account to your name (jkoil) in 2015, that would at least be an first indication of your identity.

german language



I am sorry to hear that.
We have had the blockchain for so many years now, but we are not able to implement many of the benefits of this technology in reality.

That´s the only site rule that exists ? Mmmhhh     ...  


age and wisdom are always such a thing ...   ...  I'm not sure if they always go together ...  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯


-----------

What is actually with your old account ?

It shows once again, you can't rely on anyone. So DYOR.
CMC had deleted XEM/BTC briefly only to re-release this trading pair shortly after.
Is there a trade of XEM/BTC on binance ? Theoretically = No ...
Nevertheless, the trading volume(24h) changes on CMC ..... mmmhhh ...." Binance Convert " ....?

What pisses me off the most are the crappy links from CMC for the trading pairs to the exchanges. If an exchange is not insterested in publishing a trading pair, that exchange should not be published on CMC with that trading pair either. Full stop!

mmmmhhh ...   there's a small SBF in everything ...      

@gimre


" https://forum.nem.io/t/introduce-yourself/16832 "  This topic is meant to serve as a list of introductions.
Please do not use it for replies and/or discussion such posts will be removed.

...  start with yourself .... if you already start such a thread ....

thx

 Why have many of these people lost faith in NEM & Symbol ?

------------
PS:
And before I forget .... Since when has @Hatchet actually been working for ValkyrieFunds as an advisor? ....

... but maybe I'm wrong ...

.
Without words, ... the current behaviour of a core dev has massively damaged NIS(XEM).
I'm sorry, but such statements have become so absurd.

I read this statement from @Hatchet in a post(Binance).

- Their feedback was that it had nothing to do with liquidity, but "protecting user".
  We are also clueless. There was zero communication. -
  
Well, many people who have been following this blockchain for years have the same feeling.

No, this comment was actually not meant for you.
"Nothing to add" refers to DYOR.
You're a bit late this time, I'm afraid. I had deleted two other comments and made this one. Sorry.
... what happend with the project ?... still alive and well ? ... what do you expect from such questions ?  Probably answers like " we are still alive " ?
Question and answer on the same level ...


I am more enthusiastic about this answer.


At least it shows that criticism is being taken notice of.
Even if it falls on deaf ears.



The trading volume only plays a subordinate role here. The more important reasons are those that lead to such a low trading volume in the first place.
This is one of the problems that already existed in the past, but which have intensified with the current actions of those responsible.


-------------

PS ( Only one of the reasons ) :
The unilateral stop of NIS rewards was on 11.02.22 .
This is despite the fact that NIS has very low transaction fees.
Many nodes have been shut down since then.