Got it. Thanks for the reply. My machines are all high-end CPU but low-end GPU so hopefully Claymore can put some time in to getting remote monitoring added to the CPU miner since the code is already developed for his GPU miner. The more machines I can easily monitor the more dev hashes he gets.

Either way, I love the CPU miner and will continue using it where I can.

Thanks again for the reply (and to Claymore for the work he has done).

I'm really interested in the answer to this. I am fairly new to mining but I have found in all my testing that I am getting the best performance from Claymore's CPU miner (this one). However I am mining across a number machines that are spread around geographically. Being able to monitor them from one place would be great, just so I know what is performing well and what isn't. Being able to actually manage them in some way would be icing on the cake. Being able to monitor them would allow me to deploy even more miners, but right now it's a lot of work to keep up with them.

Thanks!