I agree, it's easier and cleaner to send out whatever (or very small) amount to the voters when there is a payout. It might also make voters feel better when they see lots of incoming transactions, but in reality it costs them extra.

It actually took me additional work to implement a threshold and maintain an internal balance, but I did it as I think it's in the best interest of the voters.
If you pay out say 1 lisk with a fixed 0.1 lisk transaction fee, that is a lot. 10% is crazy high. Like Western Union high. Some pools pay out even less reward for the same fixed fee.

I'd rather pay out less often with a 1% or less transaction fee.


Reminder:

I just don't get it, and his attitude is pissing me off. It's against common sense. If it took someone 12 days to earn 5.38 lisk, then it makes sense that it will take a bit less than double that time to make at least 10 lisk to reach the threshold. That would be day 23-24, yet he is accusing me of scamming on day 25.

Maybe I should run a script checking his pool's outgoing transactions, see if they mach up with vote weights, math doesn't seem to be his strong suit.

Hi all,
I haven't been promoting the pool that much, but now that the 101 entry limit got lower there is a real chance to get in.
Don't wait with with voting, highrollerspool aims to maximize profit for it's voters and for this reason only accepts voters until it gets into active forging position.

For more details please visit the lisk thread.

Vote for highrollerspool for 80% payout. Right now at #145.

#178 currently but it changing fast.

New pool:
highrollerspool - 80%
Limited voting weight accepted to maximize payout.
For more info: https://forum.lisk.io/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=1295