I think it's a matter of profit. Why would he hold MakerDAO tokens for that long if he already has profits? He also has a lot of ETH in his wallet. I think Vitalik is selling MakerDAO tokens for profit and also maybe something is planned. Vitalik is a big crypto guy so there's bound to be something planned.

I also have hundreds of dead altcoins in my wallet. That is what I have earned in 2019-2022. I see a lot of altcoin projects go scam when they offer something that doesn't make sense. They promise a high price in advance of their coin. Like a coin with a total supply of up to 1 billion tokens then they promise that their project will hit $1. That's so ridiculous.

Yes I agree with you. Diversification is great but diversifying too much will not bring you any benefit. If one coin goes down in price and several other coins go up, of course that's not a good thing either. You won't really make a profit by diversifying a lot.
Just have your portfolio in 3 or 4 altcoins like CRO, XRP, MATIC and Vechain. It is my asset and I think it is the best altcoin in my opinion.

Pepe is no longer on my list because of the rug-pulling incident their team took. You can read the link here : PEPE's $16M Nightmare: Ex-Team Under Fire
I thought Pepe's project was a good project at first but it's no longer like that. It's very unfortunate that something like that happened to Pepe.
For ARS, currently I have invested in ARS because as you said, I believe that ARS will be in the spotlight in the next bull run season.

The problem is that meme coins are usually found on DEXs and there are thousands of different types of meme projects there. I think it will be very difficult to find good projects in the beginning because we can't trust their white papers. And if the meme coin has been listed on a large exchange, of course the price will no longer be the same and it will be very difficult to get the lowest price. I think it's like you should spend $1,000 on 10 meme coin projects on DEX or $1,000 on blue chip projects.

Yes! When it comes to privacy issues, of course DEX is more private than CEX. But the point here is about being anounymus. CEX can also provide comfort and security in transactions. For owners of small amounts of assets and still not familiar with crypto wallets CEX is a very good option because little by little they can learn and make money trading on CEX.

This is a link that discusses Shibarium: Shibarium Release Date Update and What Traders Can Expect. It stated that the L-2 Shibarium network had been launched last August. But because I don't have SHIB tokens so I can't confirm the truth of this. I did a little research and found out that there are indeed plans to launch an L-2 network on SHIBA tokens.

How do they write down their total supply? Is that 3,000,000,000? I think writing 3,000M is not the right way to write the number. That's a lot of money and I don't think the coin will ever touch $1.
Then with the business model they offer. Isn't that a standard business model with new projects in general? I think there is nothing unique about this.
Eco-friendly transportation? How do they make that happen? Isn't it better to seek funding from large investors like Softbank?

I really feel sorry for those who have invested in GALA because I see that GALA has a very high scam potential. It will be safer to store assets in BTC. I had a bad incident in 2017 where I lost almost $1,000 in altcoins and since then I decided to keep my assets in BTC only.

XRP is a good coin, as I said before. But I also agree with you that it is very difficult for XRP to experience a price increase due to this release. I am confused about how I place myself in assessing XRP because as far as I know XRP is a good coin but it is useless if it cannot provide profits for you.

I a gree with you. The danger of saving money in the bank is that the value of your money will continue to erode along with inflation. Banks benefit from the amount of their customers' deposits because there they can use our money in various sectors that benefit them. This is the real danger that people should be aware of, namely that you will not go bankrupt or lose your money but you will lose the value of the money you have saved.

I agree with you. I didn't really dig into the trends that are currently hyped. I prefer older projects that have proven to have a solid foundation. I don't like anything new with high risks. It may sound sceptical but I personally prefer what has been proven in the market. I prefer to invest in BTC even though it has a low price increase rate than some altcoin projects,

Exchanges will only list coins that are good for them, not traders. Stop talking about reputation or other things. In the ToS it has been stated that any form of loss resulting from trading is not the responsibility of the exchange. Several times we have seen that coins that were originally on large exchanges have now had to be delisted due to rugpull.

I see like the OP is complaining about the unlimited number of campaign participants like in social media campaigns and signature campaigns that are not paid with BTC. So it's like there are many people who will promote the project but with limited pay. Let's say project A has a budget of $5,000 and project B also has a budget of $5,000. If there are 1000 campaign participants in project A, that means there are 1000 people working but they are paid $5 per person. Then in project B there are 100 people working and they will be paid $50 for each participant. I think that's what OP had in his mind.

I don't like meme coins because they cause harm to many people and only a few people get lucky. And that's usually the people around the founder of the meme coin. Investors who still invest their money in meme coins are new investors who do not know that they have been cheated. I think investors who have invested there will not repeat the same thing.

I believe that XRP is a good coin and has a great future. I've been collecting XRP myself for a long time and I've had some benefits from 2017 -2023. I think adding 1 billion XRP is their strategy and I believe this is also a good thing for the market.

But still, saving in a bank, especially big banks, is very unlikely to go bankrupt. You say that many banks are bankrupt but if we do research we will see that only local banks are bankrupt. And if we look at it seems that there is not a single bank that went bankrupt in one year, except in 2008 when the world economic crisis occurred which caused several large banks in America to go bankrupt.

You can add research on how many bounty participants participate in that type of bounty. Then you can calculate the total budget allocation and divide it by the number of participants. So from the start you can consider whether to participate in the bounty or not.

As @Adbitco has said, you can try your luck in bounty campaigns that are paid with BTC. Even though it is very difficult to get accepted, you can try to find merit and improve the quality of your post.

I have yet to find an AItech project that has a good foundation. Most of what exists is hype that will end and is not suitable to be an investment asset. I honestly prefer to see them as the hype we sell when prices are already at the peak of bull season. But for investment assets I think BTC is still the best.

But that's a little difficult to realize. Every year there are thousands of new crypto projects popping up and our chances of getting a green project are very few. It's like betting at a bookie. Some may suggest checking white papers and so on but what happens when coins are launched on the market is how lucky they are to get people's attention. I think choosing blue chip projects is more feasible.