 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 »
|
|
ATTENTION: easyrimka is a troll. HE IS LIKELY PAID TO SAY NEGATIVE THINGS ABOUT WCX.
Notice how he actively promotes competing exchanges in his signature.
Notice how he never has any logical argument to prove his point. He says "scam" then leaves. He is the only one saying this.
I have proven many times, through logical arguments, that WCX is real and legitimate. They have a working exchange, full linkedin profiles, open communication through their support and Telegram group, raised many millions, .... What more do you want? A blowjob from the CEO?
Have you used WCX exchange? It works perfect. I deposited, traded, and withdrew.
Have you listened to their CEO? Smart, intelligent. Plans are clear for the company.
Have you tried buying XT? Works like a charm.
Have you tried KYC? I got verified after 5 days.
Have you tried their support? All my queries were answered in less than 1 day.
Have you chatted in the WCX telegram? Admin is there, transparent, friendly, answering questions.
So... what is your argument?
Of course, trolls will always say it is not so. Look at the trolls on the Bitfinex thread, or on the Coinbase topics. To this day, while those companies are multi billion dollar companies, still, trolls who live in their mother's basement still say these companies are a "scam". Ah. The pleasure of the Internet.
/ignore trolls
|
|
|
|
the return of the dumb idiot, you are showing to everybody that you are an idiot, you have no argument. but i understand you , you buy some sh***tcoin and you want to recover. Sad life. but i think that everybody know that WCX is just a waste of time.
Oh yes such a waste of time, everybody knows... so much waste of time that they raised $16million, plus $10 million in the past two weeks, plus have 100,000 KYC applications and 100 million volume daily on the exchange. Lol but no, everybody knows WCX is a waste of time. how dumb can one get, trollrimka, I wonder... What do people usually respond to trolls like this guy 😂😂 I guess /ignore |
|
|
|
People on this thread are really misinformed. Either they're not following the project and just posting things out of their own ass, or simply trolling. Near 0 communication during ICO (or more exactly ICOs) Did... you even try to join the Telegram group? The admin is there pretty much all day answering questions. They recently published the X Token contract on etherscan - the code (max supply, burn function, etc.) is available for everyone to read: https://etherscan.io/token/0x282ee54f8ecda53d6bb77df4a4134738375a0664still not sure you exist You... know the exchange is live and people are depositing and trading, right? If you're "angry" that you referred fake people and now you want to claim X Tokens for those fake people - give me a break. They should not waste XT on fake referrals, or airdrops to fake people. |
|
|
|
@wcxofficial, my apologies for not responding sooner.
I have one more question, which I would appreciate being answered.
Why is KYC not a requirement to trade on your platform, if it is required in order to claim referral link tokens?
I would greatly appreciate you highlighting the difference(s) there.
It certainly appears that if it was required in one instance, it would be a requirement for the other as well.
Its really bullshit, and your are just lying scammers. You should ask KYC before the start of referral bounty, not after the end of campain. Why you are changing rules? If you scammed the referrals, after you can scam investors easy. I have near 500 referred people and only few of them will send KYC. i will ask all those 500 people to post that your project is a SCAM, so you can not scam other people in future. otherwise your referrals are useless and just a tax on the token supply.. Are you dumb? Do you not have a head to think like normal people? Autism perhaps? Do you really believe what you just said? Do you think the hundreds of referred "real people" will just be willing to give their IDs and waste their time for 500XT?.. It is honestly easier to get fake and self made accounts verified than real ones. I mean if the people you referred won't even KYC or use the exchange, what use are they. Why do you deserve to get precious tokens for referring useless / inactive users? |
|
|
|
No.
Not what I said.
Either show me, (bring a screenshot or a link), of where they said that referrals needed to do more than verify email, or acknowledge that WCX is breaking their word.
It doesn't matter what is "logical". WCX made a promise.
Can you demonstrate that they put that loophole in place at the start of all of this?
Yes or no. If yes, link proof.
I don't know if the page is still up, you'll have to ask them. Or use the wayback machine maybe it's in the internet archive. I'm just saying what I remember seeing. |
|
|
|
@hamnchess. Listen. Closely.
You want reasonable arguments? Here's one.
It doesn't matter whether or not referred users *can* do KYC.
That was *not* part of the original agreement.
Both parties need to follow the *original* agreement, right?
I know you'll just repeat your talking points. "It's easy". "If they're real, they can do it", etc. etc...
But answer me the main point, and the one you keep avoiding. Why shouldn't WCX have to hold up to their end of the agreement?
(You don't have to think it is a good agreement. You just have to acknowledge that promises matter, and should be kept.)
Either show me where it was stated otherwise, or stop telling people that they have to conform to your point of view.
I'm pretty sure it was. Idk about you- I bought presale and they had a page with information about the token etc. I remember it saying something about ID verification for referrals and banned countries. In any case I think it's the logical approach. Why would they give you tokens for referring people who aren't active or real? It would be a waste of tokens IMO and pretty bad for all those who bought XT and are buying XT because it would just dilute the supply. XT sales are already really close to the 1 billion maximum cap if you take into account the presale. |
|
|
|
all my referred people are real.
Then they can KYC... dont try to talk with hamnchess, he is suc*** dev so hard, just another idiot trying to fool people and make you buy this project. everything is red here, just follow your brain and ignore hamcheese
I'm just an investor bro. I don't know why you're trolling so hard. I don't give a damn if you buy or not. I'm just giving reasonable arguments. Also, stop trying to say or imply that "this project is a scam". You're making a fool out of yourself. |
|
|
|
|
Take it easy mate. They didn't scam anyone.
You were trying to scam by referring fake people. It makes no sense to give you X tokens. Get out of here.
|
|
|
|
I and most people do not trust Wcx anymore. Dirty marketing program. Change rules to deceive marketing participants. continue to introduce the program to entice more participants to cheat more people!
Just leave. WCX should not be giving you any tokens for referring fake people. Very few available tokens left at this point. They are doing the right thing. |
|
|
|
Referrals ONLY need to do what they were asked to do in the beggining of referral bounty program. And nothing more.
ALL other things asked = cheating on people, who participated in wcx promotion
If your referrals don't verify they are real people, they are not useful. Why do you deserve XT, which is a limited supply token and which is already being over bought beyond the maximum cap, if you didn't refer real people? |
|
|
|
|
@shaw1
I'm sorry if I came across as vulgar, I was just trying to make a logical argument. It is a logical argument. There is no way at this point this project can be a scam.
Yes you can always say for ANY project, "oh maybe this ends up being a scam". This is what has been happening on this thread. Just look at the threads for Coinbase, bitfinex, etc etc and all the reviews and scam accusations. Coinbase has probably 1 star review average, and yet they are a 10 billion dollar company. people like to talk.
Every time WCX makes a release or product, people say, "oh oh but what about this, this could be a scam!", ok at what point does it not be a scam? you need ceo to get on his knees and give you a blowie?
Now whether you agree with their referral policy or not, is another story... personally I don't think referrals need to purchase, they just need to verify ID. I did verify my ID, it took a few days, and it worked fine.
|
|
|
|
|
If you referred spam and shit people, you can't come in here and say "scam".
The scam narrative died long ago.
Have you used WCX exchange? It works perfect. I deposited, traded, and withdrew.
Have you listened to their CEO? Smart, intelligent. Plans are clear for the company.
Have you tried buying XT? Works like a charm.
Have you tried KYC? I got verified after 5 days.
Have you tried their support? All my queries were answered in less than 1 day.
Have you chatted in the WCX telegram? Admin is there, transparent, friendly, answering questions.
So... what is your argument?
If this was a scam they would have taken the money and left long ago.
Why did they continue to work?
Why did they release a fully functional exchange?
How can this be a scam when they have full API functioning and trading and deposits and withdrawals functioning?
Use your mind. At this point, this project is obviously not a scam.
The reason some idiots still come in here and say it's a scam, well I have a lot to thank you for, because I was able to buy XT cheap thanks to you, before you finally discovered it wasnt a scam.
|
|
|
|
This is certainly a scam project. Pending Verify 12 days ago  ) presale -> public sale -> maybe post sale  Yes it is such a scam that you are waiting like a beggar to get your tokens... lol |
|
|
|
@wcxofficial, my apologies for not responding sooner.
I have one more question, which I would appreciate being answered.
Why is KYC not a requirement to trade on your platform, if it is required in order to claim referral link tokens?
I would greatly appreciate you highlighting the difference(s) there.
It certainly appears that if it was required in one instance, it would be a requirement for the other as well.
Its really bullshit, and your are just lying scammers. You should ask KYC before the start of referral bounty, not after the end of campain. Why you are changing rules? If you scammed the referrals, after you can scam investors easy. I have near 500 referred people and only few of them will send KYC. i will ask all those 500 people to post that your project is a SCAM, so you can not scam other people in future. If you referred real people.. they will kyc. otherwise your referrals are useless and just a tax on the token supply.. |
|
|
|
|
Lol it is far from bad reputation. Only on this thread, the Bitcointalk circle jerk is taking its toll. Idiots come in and post BS and obviously have no idea what they're talking about.
Everywhere else (telegram, etc) people communicate like real human beings and the project has a great reputation.
|
|
|
|
profiles are public you goddamn bully. you just need to be signed in to linkedin to see them. @easyrimka
you are dumb, not your fault idiot. Profile are not public, while connected, you cant click on the 2 profiles, stop lying please, thats the proof you are one of the scamming team. I enjoy everyone to check yourself, just search for wcx on linkedin and try visiting on of the 2 "former apple engineers" profile, its forbidden because you dont have same network with them, thats just a tricks to avoid people visiting and search informations @hamnchess, please, just stfu Idk bro, I can see the profile not problem. Im signed in with linkedin. for example the CEO https://linkedin.com/in/anthony-burns-3823a915a |
|
|
|
|
profiles are public you goddamn bully. you just need to be signed in to linkedin to see them. @easyrimka
|
|
|
|
you know what you are ? Either a dumb idiot, or one of the dev team. If you are dumb, feel free to buy all this red flag project sh***tcoin.
former apple engineers lol , you know what, im a former NASA engineers, send me your money i will offer you a brain.
You're an idiot. Did you take time to look at the project? Do you even know what I'm talking about, or are you just posting BS just to post BS? The dev team is on Linkedin. They interviewed the CEO. What else you looking for? That's already more than 90% of ICO projects who post fake pictures of their team. Get real. |
|
|
|
|
This thread is a hit job on WCX. Haters was calling it scam and WCX prove them wrong every time. Haters keep hating.
The summary:
- team: excellent (former Apple engineers)
- product: delivered working exchange
- roadmap: more tokens, futures exchange, decentralized exchange
- demand: 16 million $ sold in the presale, and public sell selling rate of 10 million tokens per day
- sale structure: fixed cap
This is one of those projects where the team dont do much crazy marketing and at one point everyone is gonna discover it and its gonna explode. I have more than my fair share of money invested.
|
|
|
|
View Exchange is a robot
A tweet from their official account on October 10th 2017 states that the product is now live. However, the product we see is merely an API call from TradingView which documents no trades, no book, and no fills. Moreover, when we attempted to sign up for the service, we were told that all spots had currently been filled. This could mean its a Beta, but why announce a live product on Twitter in that case?
If you took the time to read @wcxofficial last update on here, you'd know. i'm not answering you, it's one click away |
|
|
|
|
