Show Posts
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 »
|
Is it already possible to do cold staking on a raspberry pi. Are there instructions where to retrieve and how to compile the wallet? I can only find tutorials for the 'old' stratis wallet.
cold staking is yet to be activated...when 95% of stakers move to the new wallet cold staking will be activated and then you will be able to cold stake using a raspberry...you can stake on raspberry now, its just that your wallet needs to be open till cold staking gets activated. I know I can stake on a raspberry now. I've been doing that for the last year. I only wondered if I have to use a new wallet once cold staking is activated or if it is also possible with the Stratis wallet. Is the wallet you're using on the Pi the Stratis QT-Wallet? Yes For now you are fine to continue using the qt-wallet. However, at some point the qt client will be phased out by the Stratis. It is not known whether this will be before cold staking is activated or after, simply because it's not possible to know when cold staking will be activated (since it is up to the users to show support for activation of cold staking by staking through Stratis Core - by staking through the qt-wallet, you are implicitly showing support AGAINST cold staking, which is a decision every user has the right to make individually). If I had to give some advice, I'd suggest that you prefer to stake on the Pi, stick with the qt-wallet for now, because the Stratis Core wallet needs to optimised for Pi. Once the Stratis Core wallet has been optimised for the Pi, it's probably best to switch to Core on the Pi (there will be clear guides to follow once it comes to it, and support for people making the switch). It's best to switch for a few different reasons, and not just for the activation of cold staking. There are security improvements for both the wallet and for the overall network, extra functionality etc. Hope this helps answer your question Yes, this answered my question. Thanks a lot.
|
|
|
Is it already possible to do cold staking on a raspberry pi. Are there instructions where to retrieve and how to compile the wallet? I can only find tutorials for the 'old' stratis wallet.
cold staking is yet to be activated...when 95% of stakers move to the new wallet cold staking will be activated and then you will be able to cold stake using a raspberry...you can stake on raspberry now, its just that your wallet needs to be open till cold staking gets activated. I know I can stake on a raspberry now. I've been doing that for the last year. I only wondered if I have to use a new wallet once cold staking is activated or if it is also possible with the Stratis wallet. Is the wallet you're using on the Pi the Stratis QT-Wallet? Yes
|
|
|
Is it already possible to do cold staking on a raspberry pi. Are there instructions where to retrieve and how to compile the wallet? I can only find tutorials for the 'old' stratis wallet.
cold staking is yet to be activated...when 95% of stakers move to the new wallet cold staking will be activated and then you will be able to cold stake using a raspberry...you can stake on raspberry now, its just that your wallet needs to be open till cold staking gets activated. I know I can stake on a raspberry now. I've been doing that for the last year. I only wondered if I have to use a new wallet once cold staking is activated or if it is also possible with the Stratis wallet.
|
|
|
Is it already possible to do cold staking on a raspberry pi. Are there instructions where to retrieve and how to compile the wallet? I can only find tutorials for the 'old' stratis wallet.
|
|
|
Why Stratis is not on the most important event for cryptocurrency? It is the best please to expose itself and show what Stratis is no? Chris said he wants Stratis to be in top 3 coins. LISK,WAVES,QUTM,ICON are there...
Any explanation?
And which event might that be?
|
|
|
When I take a look at the roadmap, there will be some releases this month. It`s almost the end of the month. Is there anyone with some information?
I wonder if there will be any releases this month. Just a few days to go and no news about any upcoming updates.
|
|
|
Let's hope that the dev team will deliver according to the new roadmap. $500 at the end of the year would be very nice, but it the current market (who knows what will come this year) I'm already happy with $50.
Lol I really like Stratis but hoping that it goes to 50 billion USD market cap till the end of the year is just utopian. What do you mean it's utopian? Do you mean it's a dream? I like to dream . And hopefully my dream comes true.
|
|
|
It's nice to see that XEM is moving up again... +19% at the moment. Let's see if XEM recovers again.
|
|
|
Let's hope that the dev team will deliver according to the new roadmap. $500 at the end of the year would be very nice, but it the current market (who knows what will come this year) I'm already happy with $50.
|
|
|
For those of you with Ledger Nano S, there is a new firmware out v1.41. The new features look very good and the number of apps that can be installed has increased significantly to 18.
Thanks a lot for the remark, I'll check the new firmware tonight. I was always a bit weary about the limited number of app that could be installed on one ledger.
|
|
|
Stratis is still my priority in my portfolio, although you guys continue dumping it, I still have confidence that it will go 10x in eth scale soon. Have more patience guys! You will be rewarded a lot.
I think so too. I'm not going to touch the tokens until the STRAT will cost $ 500 for the token. And it will happen. Just have to wait. Same with me. Although Stratis is not performing the way I like, more coins do the same. I’ll be waiting for better times.
|
|
|
My idea is simple: If XEM devs cannot stop stolen token sale it has a big trust problem. When ETH were stolen there were roll back and coins were defended. ETC stayed in old road with stolen coins and it took 2 ears to recover from it. I do hope that xem will recover but even I feel that trust were lost and moment till now I do not see any strong XEM dev confirmation that problem will be solve. From what I understood, coincheck itself was the biggest loser of the hack as the biggest part of the stolen XEM belonged to them. The customers that lost XEM get their coins back. Is it really necessary to do a hard fork for a company that created the conditions for the hack itself (by keeping all the coins in a hot wallet). What is annoying is that, if it is true that already 84 million dollars worth of XEM are laundered, there is still more that 400 million dollars worth of XEM waiting to be laundered. Let's see what happens in the coming weeks/months. Hopefully the news of catapult being introduced to the world may affect the rate of XEM. At current prices if he has sold $84 million worth. That's 168 million NEM which leaves 322 Million Nem which is $172 million. Still a tidy sum but my guess is this will be a drip feed into the overall market and should take some time. My fault . Mixed up XEM and USD.
|
|
|
My idea is simple: If XEM devs cannot stop stolen token sale it has a big trust problem. When ETH were stolen there were roll back and coins were defended. ETC stayed in old road with stolen coins and it took 2 ears to recover from it. I do hope that xem will recover but even I feel that trust were lost and moment till now I do not see any strong XEM dev confirmation that problem will be solve. From what I understood, coincheck itself was the biggest loser of the hack as the biggest part of the stolen XEM belonged to them. The customers that lost XEM get their coins back. Is it really necessary to do a hard fork for a company that created the conditions for the hack itself (by keeping all the coins in a hot wallet). What is annoying is that, if it is true that already 84 million dollars worth of XEM are laundered, there is still more that 400 million dollars worth of XEM waiting to be laundered. Let's see what happens in the coming weeks/months. Hopefully the news of catapult being introduced to the world may affect the rate of XEM.
|
|
|
How long until we are KYC approved and receive our tokens? I invested and submitted everything 2 weeks ago but still nothing.
You will receive the tokens (if you are approved) on the 1st of march. How do I know if it's submitted? I can still submit but I think I submitted already 3 times just to be sure. The site isn't very clear as it doesn't state anywhere wether you submitted or not. You just see the screen to submit as if you never submitted. I also didn't receive any email. It will say the following just beneath step 2: "Additional information submitted. Verification in progress" There's no need to submit it again. If it says that, you're good. It says the following now: "Congratulations. Your KYC checking is complete and clear. Don't forget to provide your Ethereum address." Does this mean that my KYC has been reviewed and approved? Yes, if you see this your KYC is approved. Just make sure you have submitted your Ethereum address.
|
|
|
It's good to see an updated roadmap, as it was very quiet last weeks. I'll be waiting for the releases to come. Let's see if Strat will pump at least a little bit with the conference and ICO's approaching.
|
|
|
Is there any news about the status of the Breeze wallet? It should be ready at the end of last year, but I haven't seen an official release yet.
|
|
|
Total transactions per second: Visa: 24,000 Ripple (CCC: XRP-USD): 1,500 PayPal: 193 Bitcoin Cash (CCC: BCH-USD): 60 Litecoin (CCC: LTC-USD): 56 Dash (CCC: DASH-USD): 48 Ethereum (CCC: ETH-USD): 20 Bitcoin (CCC: BTC-USD): 7 https://steemit.com/cryptocurrency/@steemhoops99/transaction-speed-bitcoin-visa-iota-paypalVISA can handle on average around 1,700 transactions per second (tps), call it a daily peak rate of 4,000 tps. PayPal, in contrast, handled around 10 million transactions per day for an average of 115 tps in late 2014. Today the Bitcoin network is restricted to a sustained rate of 7 tps due Iota can already handle between 500-800 tps. Ethereum – 20 transactions per second (Cost= 0.01-0.1 USD+) Only of those above, which itself advertises its speed is VISA https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visa_Inc. can handle up to 30,000 simultaneous transactions and up to 100 billion computations every second Is this the raw truth? If it is, that makes two things true. Crypto currencies are too slow for real world usage. And therefore LemonAndFries had it right:NEM is an experimental. Now time for some fun facts that wikipedia won't tell you: - a) in case of any problems visa is pushing responsibility onto the banks
- b) guess what, banks will push responsibility on you
- c) they can achieve such speed, mostly cause they don't friggin care about double spends, why?
glad you ask, well see a) and b) - d) if your card will get cloned and used in some other country - guess what you'll be charged, getting money back often takes few months... (mind cloned not stolen, in case of stealing, chargeback to the rescue)
- e) there are many POSes, that do not require chip-based authorization
- f) even worse, there are places, that do not require your PIN when using magnetic stripe - only your signature - you might be lucky if someone will use your stolen card in this way, cause in this case banks often shift responsibility onto seller, and he'll have to cover for his loss
- g) banks have limits on the losses they cover, so i) they will not cover if there was not enough funds stolen ii) usually there's some upper limit as well (although it'd be highly unlikely to get past it - i.e. you shouldn't keep that much money on account associated with your credit/debit card)) in EU it's several thousand of euros
So yeah, Heil VISA and let the banks live and prosper ❤️ If NEM can really reach 4000 transactions per second with the Catapult release, it will be faster than Ripple. Or is this speed only reached with the private chain and not with the public chain?
|
|
|
Although the whitelist registration has started, it still is not clear on which date the ICO will commence. Hopefully stratis recovers at least a bit from the current dip before the ICO starts.
|
|
|
A very good looking OP, the infographics are also very informative. Nice job!!!!
|
|
|
Let's hope that Chris is waiting for the right moment to announce the ICO. The timing of the previous one could have been been better (BTC value suddenly falling)
|
|
|
|