|
581
|
Other / Meta / Re: Spondoolies Spam
|
on: December 23, 2014, 03:10:23 AM
|
|
there is one simple way of fixing these "omg spamz" problem, each major company has their own sub forum inside the "Hardware" section, and an extra for the "New Companies" and its upto the main company to monitor their subs.
... oh i can see whats going to happen if that ever came in. "i don't like your words, *delete*"
but if people going to have hate over Ckolivas de-cluttering the forums by collating all the reviews, they have a problem, i was surprised it never happened.
Hell, even if the thread owners locked the original post and moved onto the other 2, that would help out the "spamz in ma face" issue
|
|
|
|
|
582
|
Bitcoin / Mining / Re: After ASIC what comes next?
|
on: December 23, 2014, 02:42:20 AM
|
|
thats why "cloud mining" is spawning. later they will move over into every electrical items, companies will pay a % of a cost to have a single little chip mining away inside some light-bulb and wall-warts, connected via wifi, so your little 5PH farm will move into 100PH or more. then when Quantum Arithmetic Logic Units come out into the main world, there will never be a "*Hash a second" calculation again...
Imagination, it happens
|
|
|
|
|
583
|
Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [Review] Spondoolies SP20 review - A Green miner with a Loud fan
|
on: December 22, 2014, 12:18:05 AM
|
1st off: Why all these reviews spamming the hardware section?! edit: OK, i see why now, Spondoolies-Tech doing Spondoolie things... making some smile, and some so bitter they never got one (people even calling it a scam, wow!) 2nd, nice review! now i want one.. time to sell my POS car 3rd: Sexy! The chipped corners reminds me of amd xp, durons... nice times! It would be nice to have a miner with lga775(or newer) socket mounting holes! then i can be motivated to repair my cascade system for -80c cooling  Does broken corner affect performance? My broken chip runs at 500 Hz comparing with other chips running at 650Hz Very unlikely. the worst it would do is destroy a few calculation units, what it would most likely do is make the chip miscalculate a nonce, and give you ether hardware errors or just plain rejections. it wouldn’t slow it down in any way, just error out like mad. thinking back to my AthlonsXP days too, i had one with a large chip that took out half of the L2 cache, it would run without an issue, but once i pushed it with data processing (moving files or calculation prime) it just die. i used it for net surfing, but i avoided large pages, it tend to kill it too. i could go on about these cpus, like the old pencil trick, how i let out its magical blue smoke, etc, but that's for the offtopic sections. |
|
|
|
|
584
|
Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [1200 TH] CKPool (www.kano.is) from the cgminer devs [0.9% PPLNS]
|
on: December 19, 2014, 09:25:57 AM
|
Yeah we're over 2PH at the moment ... not sure for how long but anyway  Edit: OK it's quite variable - we'll see where it ends up ... it was 2PH for the past hour but it's now dropping again. I was just going to ask you what was going on, we were 2.2 ph for awhile there. Antminer was even back for awhile. Yeah I only woke up shortly before my post - he's rearranging his setup - it may be a little while yet until it's all sorted. is lightsword dropping in and out? Seems it was temporary. ... and he's back in again. Yep up and down and up and down and ... why cant they just stay on for a week? be nice for some extra speed to get my 50c of bitcoin! |
|
|
|
|
586
|
Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [Guide] Dogie's Comprehensive Manufacturer Trustworthiness Guide [17th Dec]
|
on: December 19, 2014, 08:56:05 AM
|
et découpez You're wrong regarding BitFury. Dogie gave them F in Ethics which means they're operating a farm. BitFury are operating over 40MW of farms, in Georgia, Iceland and Finland. They're very proud of this fact, for example: http://vimeo.com/104009961In Bitcoin mining, if a company operates a farm it competes with it's consumer. IMHO, giving 2 points penalty for BitFury mega industrial scale mining operation is way too law. As I wrote, we've reached stock on all our products line, which means no more people waiting on pre-orders. We still have small percentage (about 2%) of customers to refund on the spec change. It will be done this month. Guy Ah, i missed that F thing, fare enough. i don't know what dogie thinks is the diffrence between "F = Operates own mining farm" and "FF = Operates own large mining farm" and no more pre-orders left for you, fare enough.. did you finalize the pre-orders last month or 2? that maybe why you still have that score, its past tense. your score has increase since last time, so i wouldn’t complain, be better then the others, you will rise above them. Question is, next lot of hardware you make, or you going to advertise and take orders before final construction? (aka pre-orders), or are you going to build a stock and sell them there and then? Hell, at least you haven’t tested your miners on animals!  on the other hand, you could just ignore this whole thing and run your business without even consolidating this list, Test the miners on animals, sell everyone a bit of paper with "I O U MINER" on it, ignore everyone’s problems and sell the crappiest chunks of scrap, then call yourself the best company, and run off with everyone’s money till the feds come after you! tl:dr, it was the preorders that wrecked your score and BitFury is on the way down Please read the last few pages here. The FF was discussed and the fact that we won't take pre-orders on our 3rd gen and why. Testing on animals wasn't discuss. *Gasp* so you are testing on animals! :O Right, i re-read the last few pages, i was positive you're asking why you are lower then bitfury, and they only get a -2 only on their ethics from self mining.. i guess an apology is in order for biting your butt over your old pre-orders, i'll still raise my nose and say better not do it again with the SP107 and SP12.. and yeah, no idea what dogies plans are on the F and old FF score, going to change the scoring? make sure its so unfair that anyone looking at a farm gets a -100, yep yep. |
|
|
|
|
588
|
Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [Guide] Dogie's Comprehensive Manufacturer Trustworthiness Guide [17th Dec]
|
on: December 19, 2014, 07:50:54 AM
|
et découpez You're wrong regarding BitFury. Dogie gave them F in Ethics which means they're operating a farm. BitFury are operating over 40MW of farms, in Georgia, Iceland and Finland. They're very proud of this fact, for example: http://vimeo.com/104009961In Bitcoin mining, if a company operates a farm it competes with it's consumer. IMHO, giving 2 points penalty for BitFury mega industrial scale mining operation is way too law. As I wrote, we've reached stock on all our products line, which means no more people waiting on pre-orders. We still have small percentage (about 2%) of customers to refund on the spec change. It will be done this month. Guy Ah, i missed that F thing, fare enough. i don't know what dogie thinks is the diffrence between "F = Operates own mining farm" and "FF = Operates own large mining farm" and no more pre-orders left for you, fare enough.. did you finalize the pre-orders last month or 2? that maybe why you still have that score, its past tense. your score has increase since last time, so i wouldn’t complain, be better then the others, you will rise above them. Question is, next lot of hardware you make, or you going to advertise and take orders before final construction? (aka pre-orders), or are you going to build a stock and sell them there and then? Hell, at least you haven’t tested your miners on animals! on the other hand, you could just ignore this whole thing and run your business without even consolidating this list, Test the miners on animals, sell everyone a bit of paper with "I O U MINER" on it, ignore everyone’s problems and sell the crappiest chunks of scrap, then call yourself the best company, and run off with everyone’s money till the feds come after you! tl:dr, it was the preorders that wrecked your score and BitFury is on the way down |
|
|
|
|
589
|
Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: ASICMiner BE300S Samples Arrived, <0.2W/G Achieved at Board Level
|
on: December 19, 2014, 07:20:03 AM
|
FC, you can probably dispel a little confusion here. The MPW samples you have and are testing are not in the same package as the final chips will be in. The production chips will look significantly different than the test chips, and the board package will be different.
Is that correct?
BE200 -- QFN 8x8 or 9x9 BE300S -- FCLGA 5x5 BE300 Final Version -- FCLGA nxn (n not determined yet) QFN in a low voltage setting introduces too much overhead, so although we wanted compatibility hard, we chose a different package. i thought Flip Chip Land Grid Array (FCLGA), would require pins, or solder balls on the PCB, to connect to the land grid at the bottom of the package. Something like them socket'ed intel cpus, you know, they flipped the chip for the bond pads to face down, for the bond wires to be all inside the substrate. these BE300S's still look like Quad Flat No-leads (QFN) now Flip Chip Ball Grid Array (FCBGA), like you'd see on DDR2/3/4 ram, is what i thought the setup would be like. ..if you want exposed dies, you could follow the path of what intel does with one of their gigabit Ethernet controller chips, have the dies backside flush with the top of the substrate. or you could copy knc or cointerra and have bare dies just sitting on the substrate and held by glue. on the note of compatibility, there was no compatibility between the BE100 and the BE200. we all like the "drop in and run" idea, but i've never seen too much backwards compatibility with packages like this. so don't kick yourself over it, make the package the way the chips need it, even if you have to go 40 pin DIP, people will work around it ... am i rambling on? |
|
|
|
|
590
|
Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [Guide] Dogie's Comprehensive Manufacturer Trustworthiness Guide [17th Dec]
|
on: December 19, 2014, 02:54:25 AM
|
so I guess this means they think Dogie is paid by the competition.....
There's no "think" about it - dogie is paid by the competition. I doubt anyone would have to pay anyone anything to post the simple truth about Black Arrow. Their customers are willing to do that free of charge, I assure you..... Absolutely. Everyone knows that if a reviewer is being paid by a manufacturer, he will never tell the truth about that manufacturer. Isn't that right dogie?  I don't think it's fair towards Dogie. The guide isn't perfect and I have my reservations which some of it I posted. Specifically, I find it very annoying that BitFury, which I consider bad for the ecosystem is so highly ranked. I think that self mining on industrial mega scale should be punished severely in ranking. I think that Dogie is doing an honest work. Nobody is perfect and erring is human. Diaclaimer: we send Dogie review units of all our miners and he work hard - hours - on preparing the guides. Guy just remember, this is what the actions are with the companies and actions to the consumers, at the present time. its not a all round thing since the day they started. Basically, dogie has marked BitFury as not doing any mining now, unless there is evidence that they are now, the score stays the same. now the question i have for you, Spondoolies-Tech, is you have sold pre-orders, and them pre-orders are still in effect? do you still have customers that are waiting on orders? once they are filled out, and you're not selling anymore pre-orders, your score will change. now, if you are going to claim you do not have anymore people waiting for orders, we would like to see that. Just a disclaimer, I'm not following your side of the world Spondoolies-Tech, i don't know what you're doing, other then you have hardware that i'd never buy (way outside my price range). so i know nothing other then you do have people still in pre-order status. |
|
|
|
|
591
|
Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [1200 TH] CKPool (www.kano.is) from the cgminer devs [0.9% PPLNS]
|
on: December 19, 2014, 12:19:26 AM
|
Yeah we're over 2PH at the moment ... not sure for how long but anyway Edit: OK it's quite variable - we'll see where it ends up ... it was 2PH for the past hour but it's now dropping again. I was just going to ask you what was going on, we were 2.2 ph for awhile there. Antminer was even back for awhile. Yeah I only woke up shortly before my post - he's rearranging his setup - it may be a little while yet until it's all sorted. is lightsword dropping in and out? |
|
|
|
|
595
|
Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: BFGMiner 5.0.0: GBT+Stratum, RPC, Mac/Linux/Win64, BlackArrow Prospero, KnC Nep.
|
on: December 16, 2014, 12:01:55 AM
|
hi, is it possible to connet to multiple pool trough multiple http proxy? i'm struggling to make it works with my asic hardware, but if i put the -x option bfg start and i get the error "no server to connect exiting" without the proxy works fine. thi is an exaple of my bat bfgminer --scrypt -o stratum xxxxxxx -x http:ip:port -u xxx -p xxx -o stratum xxxxxxx -x http:ip:port -u xxx -p xxx -o stratum xxxxxxx -x http:ip:port -u xxx -p xxx -S noauto -S \\.\COMx --set-device gridseed:clock=800
paus bfgminer -o http://pool1:port -u pool1username -p pool1password -o http://pool2:port -u pool2usernmae -p pool2password so if you go bfgminer --scrypt -o stratum+tcp://stratum.mining:3334 -u worker -p password -o stratum+tcp://stratum.mining2:3333 -u worker -p password -o stratum+tcp://stratum.mining3:3332 -u worker -p password -S noauto -S \\.\COMx --set-device gridseed:clock=800 also, try one pool at a time, see if its not down. |
|
|
|
|
599
|
Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: BFGMiner 5.0.0: GBT+Stratum, RPC, Mac/Linux/Win64, BlackArrow Prospero, KnC Nep.
|
on: December 15, 2014, 11:17:30 PM
|
Hey Luke, any luck with rockxie and his "New R-box"? im not sure if its my hardware doing the bad hashing (i suspect it is) or if its the lack of information you're getting from rockxie
Nope. hm.. having the hardware wouldn’t help you much ether, am i correct? They did send hardware... which is part of why it's confusing that they stopped communicating. Well thats just bloody annoying, not me annoyed by you, but them, you can't do crap, and i bet people bug you plenty of times about these guys.. |
|
|
|
|
600
|
Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: IN STOCK - OneStringMiner boards, up to 39GH/s last ITEMS: from US$15...FUN!!!
|
on: December 15, 2014, 08:14:02 AM
|
hmm, whats the postage to Australia 2703?
im thinking if you have any, 2x diy2 would be what im after...
I do have them available. Ouch, shipping is costly to Australia, FedEx €58.12, AU$87.79 for 2 DIY2. You might want to order more than 2 DIY2, to lower the relative transport cost per DIY2. Each additional DIY2 will be another ~ €5 in transport cost. dang, that's what i thought. I'll see what i can pull together next year (oh saying that sounds so odd) |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
