 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 »
|
I had 8 merits in my account but today I got 1 merit so now I have maximum 9 merits which I want to give to members from Newbie to rank up. Because there are many posts where they are deprived of merit.
Note: I myself have not opened this to get merit because i have many helpful posts where i have no merit. I just want to give some of my submitted merits to new members so that they can be encouraged to do better. You should encourage me.
You can just send your merits to those newbies as intended so why is the need to open another thread? Honestly I found this thread to fish merit since most of the merit giveaways thread are bombarded with merits. Whether you admit it or not that is how I, or maybe some of us see it. see this ↓↓↓? but you could have easily shared those 8 merits you have without creating this topic Exactly. So much fuss for 8 merits... is a bit strange imho. Sorry OP, but imho this is just merit fishing. Don't be mad on me, but this is my take on this thread. However, good luck to the participants! |
|
|
|
|
It seems even malls are taking advantage of crypto craze, it is a good site to see that bigger store is taking notice of NFTs and cryptocurrency, it is quite surprising because Banco de Oro is somehow hostile on cryptocurrency but SM Megamall rides NFT and Bitcoin popularity. If I am not mistaken Banco de Oro is an SM Investment.
|
|
|
|
@PoW supporters aka Bitcoin Cultist
No one is creating any new PoW tech coins.
Because they all know PoW is dying.
Not that PoW is dying, POS is cost-efficient in scamming people. That is one of the best reasons why many prefer POS than PoW In a money-grab developer's mind: why bother with PoW when they can use PoS to mine 100% of the coins and sell them to unsuspecting investors. If you happen to see the pattern of new projects today, there are lots selling their pre-mined coins/token here and there. |
|
|
|
Kakagulat naman ang mga pangyayari about sa mga respected members natin dito sa local forum. We all know wala talagang scam na nangyare pero syempre, pera paren ang pinaguusapan dito kaya hinde ren naten masisi yung iba especially yung mga donator kung saan ba napunta ang pera, unfortunately baka wala nang magtiwala sa atin, sayang kase super dame natulungan ng charity na iyon.
I wanted to believe that pero sa mga ganung pagkakataon tanging documents lang ang makakapagpatunay. Applying logic about amount in hand at mga activities.. and without supporting documents talagang doon babagsak ang conclusion kahit na wala talaga silang kasalanan. Anyway, we are all just speculating, only them knows the truth  . Active or not we really need another source of merit, though hinde naman masyadong active ang local thread naten pero at least if meron tayong dalawang merit source malaking tulong paren talaga ito. Kung pwede lang magnominate ng mga Pinoy na qualified as a merit source gagawin ko, kaya lang baka talaga hinde sila interesado. My way ba aside from applying para maging merit source? Ano ba ang mga kailangan para maapprove as merit source?
I think crwth is a good choice. |
|
|
|
~snipped
Thank you for the information however, theymos also stated that:
- Exercise a lot of forgiveness. People shouldn't be "permanently branded" as a result of small mistakes from which we've all moved past.
This neutral rating somehow is permanently branding any account that is tagged to be one of the worst spammers of all time.. A little tweak on the sentence may do, probably. Part of the Spammer Blacklist: this user has made at least 50 replies that are not up to forum standards. This user is part the top 1000 worst spammers of all time. I believe actmyname will be actively monitoring his list and update or remove his neutral rating to those who were tagged if they have proven that they had improved over time? Since, theymos also stated that: But if they correct the problem and don't seem likely to do it again, remove the rating or replace it with a neutral.
That said, thank you for hearing me out. |
|
|
|
Kudos to @actmyname to help the forum identify the worst spammer but whether it is negative, positive or neutral rating the guideline theymos gave regarding rating is very simple and clear. - Do not rate people based on the quality of their posts.
I am very much agree to what vaculin stated . |
|
|
|
username: boytrial multiplier: 116.6x  |
|
|
|
Talagang labasan na ng kita sa BTC ahh. Masaya ako sa inyong mga success story, kaya lang senxa na wala ako maambag na nabili ko, puro nasa pautang kasi ang kinita ko kay BTC at 90% doon hindi nagbayad  . Mahirap magpautang, wala na ngang tubo hindi pa babayaran hehe. Kaya siguro ang maiilista ko dito sa nabili ko ay: Utang na loob ng mga nangutang na hindi nagbayad!!! Hindi man siya bagay at least makakatulong din sa akin ito balang araw. |
|
|
|
Here is my work :  BTC address: 1KuaLaU49bcQ3UqnkL7mtTwLK6Un5cib9K
Description: Broken Anonymous Mask : Bitcoin used to be known as anonymous coin but later found out that it is not fully anonymous but rather a pseudonymous cryptocurrency. Worst, the government forced their way into tracking Bitcoin user through the use of KYC on exchanges, "We are Satoshi" : in absense of Satoshi Nakamoto, each and every one of Bitcoin enthusiast became the Satoshi of Bitcoin which help in propagation of awareness campaign for bitcoin mass adoption. For 10 years Bitcointak.org had been an all out discussion for personal belief to blockchain technology, thus discussion covers every walks of life's topic, from off topic, Bitcoin discussion, altcoin discussion to technical and development. Any topic a person has.. we discuss it all here!!! |
|
|
|
Loan Amount: 0.2 ETH
Loan Purpose: Needs
Loan Repay Amount: 0.217 BTC
Loan Repay Date: September 14, 2019
Type of Collateral: None
Escrow profile Link: None
Bitcoin Address: 0xfaf352ef83be399b733a34a774777ff012409cc8
Lender: Darker45
Loan funded. Reference ID: 850e4e53 Thank you for the opportunity! Please acknowledge receipt and pay on time! ETH has been received. No worries. Thanks Darker45! Highlighting some typo.. please check the bolded part of the qouted message. Baka magkaroon ng conflict though alam ko na hindi magtitake advantage ang nagpahiram . |
|
|
|
I have a view, if ethereum will run slowly and then do high pomp in several stages this year. but we must remain careful with corrections. as is the case with bitcoin, the possibility of ethereum will have a move as if there will be a pump.
I do not think Ethereum will have a high pump, I think it will have a slow progress in price value. Until the POS had taken place, it will be a snail movement for ETH. |
|
|
|
Hmm... Read this update from him : 3$ is rate for old P2PS, and 0.03$ is rate for new P2PS and token pool change from 150k To 1.5M
Btw I don't know why, but I saw NashAmajh (bounty manager) have a many problem/error on his bounty/airdrop. On migranet airdrop I saw on spreadsheet there is someone who filled out the form inconsequently, he fills just "asdasfasd" on username and fills correct ETH wallet, but the problem is I see 300++ like this on spreadsheet and when I try to fill out a form, 1 email is only allowed to fill 1 time. So who is using more than 300 e-mails just to do that? He should be updating the Announcement post after updating such, I also checked the spreadsheet but it seems the payment adjustment is not implemented.  |
|
|
|
Well they do have a quotw already in that if the tokens are to be expected to be price(at launch or down the roadmap) at $3 USD. Which I think that they have an expectation of price in the future. And a bounty hunter must analyze the context to fully understand the bouty announcements. As such it is still up to the investors and the market what the price of the token will be, which I think a bounty hunter should be aware of.
Indeed but declaring the token in a certain unrealistic value at its current state, just to lure participants to join, i believe it is a shady activity in part of the Bounty manager. |
|
|
|
A lot of bounty hunters already understood what you are explaining, that is the norm of most bounties, quoting a certain expected amount as giveaways which does not reflect the reality. Particularly I do subscribe to such, I would prefer a project with much reasonable quote and will likely be able to pay it. It is annoying seeing very new projects with not up to 200 persons in their telegram group promising huge amount in millions as as dollar worth give away where they are struggling to raise few thousands
I know but this case I think is kinda exaggerated, pricing the token 100 times the IEO to attract participants, Veil on the other hand gives at least a reasonable conversion depending on the exchange rate. See the difference of these two bounty. |
|
|
|
Update: I wanted to know your opinion regarding this matter, I am browsing bounty campaigns to kill time and possible project to invest in since I need to know the allocation of Bounty token since often times this influx of token saturate the market and caused the price to go down when I stumble on this bounty thread titled: (BOUNTY) 💰💰🔥 P2PS Bounty Campaign $450k Worth Of Token For Hunter 💰💰🔥 I noticed this thing.. The bounty,/ bounty manager priced the initial token price as $3
Token Pool: 150K tokens (equivalent to $450K USD if computed with the base token price of $3 each).
150K tokens will be distributed to successful applicants of the Signature, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Content Creation and Telegram.
This bounty starts on April 27, 2019, and ends when reach hunter $450k.
While the IEO price is $0.03 I would not mind if it is in stake distribution but the token reward is fixed. I feel sorry for the bounty participant being deceived by this rate. I have nothing against the bounty manager but I just feel that there is something wrong. How can you clasified this kind of action? I'm kinda confused because I believe, with deception hunters will end up nothing. What can you say about this? I need your input since I am confused. Is this kind of deception allowed in the bounty campaigns? Are bounty managers allowed to intentionally increase the price of token to attract more participants? I think this is deception and should not be tolerated. |
|
|
|
Stake allocation;
Copper/Jr, Member: 1 P2PS/Post - $3 Worth Of Token
Member: 2 P2PS/Post - $6 Worth Of Token
Full Member: 3 P2PS/Post - $9 Worth Of Token
Sr. Member: 5 P2PS/Post - $15 Worth Of Token
Hero/Legendary Member: 7 P2PS/Post - $21 Worth Of Token
Pointing out a huge discrepancy on the IEO price and the rate here. IEO price is around 0.03 USD per p2ps, how could 1 p2ps equivalent to $3? How did you end up on this calculation? Is this another way of cheating/deceiving the bounty hunters? |
|
|
|
Was this a quality (informative) post? Yes. it hasn't been merited doesn't say otherwise.
Are you honestly calling copy-pasted material a "quality post"? A "slightly better spam" might be more fitting. It seems tmfp agrees with you I appreciate it must be difficult for non English speakers to "rank up", as you put it, just wondering whether wholesale copypasta (reformatted or not) is the way forward?
Good selection of Books btw, nice list
@OP you could have used column and row format to make it look better for viewing. Sample : 
The.Rise.and.Rise.of.Bitcoin | 
I.am.Satoshi | 
The Rise and Rise of Bitcoin |
|
|
|
|
I dont know whether the way I understood the discussion is Right or wrong.
I was confused with few things like how to trust any crypto currency(Small cap Coins)? was TA enough?
Then, my friend said, know about the team that is building it if that has the potential then you can easy thrust as the good team will always take the project higher etc.,
This statement made me more confused as the person or team behind BTC is unknown but, still people believe in it. If so then should I be worried about the team in case of other coins? So., Confusing
Other investors use fundamental analysis before investing. That includes the position of the token/coins in the market, the fund of the project, the team or developer of the project, etc. Your friend is right when he told you to know the person or team behind the project. Please be aware that the anonymity of developer raises a red flag especially when they are undergoing a crowdfunding. Bitcoin had established its industry and several developer of it are not anonymous anymore. Sure Satoshi Nakamoto is anonymous but he had stopped participating in the development for a very long time (probably behind the scene if he is still up to it). |
|
|
|
Hindi paglalagay ng "stop" (stop-loss) sa trading
Ang hindi paglalagay ng "stop" sa trading ay maaring makaapekto ng malaki sa inyong account at sa inyong emosyon.
Eto talaga pinakalagi kong isinasa alang alang sa sa tuwing ako ay nag tetrade para maiwasan ang malaking pagkatalo sa pagtetrade, mahirap na at baka tuluyang bumagsak ang coin na hinohold mo atleast pag may stop-loss ka matalo ka man ay minimized na sya. Tama ka dyan kaibigan, maraming tao ang nagkakamali sa hindi paglagay ng stop-loss sa kanilang mga trades. Marami kasing scenario na maganda ang presyo ng tinitrade bago matulog ngunit pagkagising mo ay bagsak na pla ang presyo. Marami tuloy ang nagiging bagholder ng isang coins or token na walang halaga.
Patuloy kong iaupdate ang OP ayon sa mga ibinahaging karanasan at impormasyo sa talakayang ito. Mas maganda kasi na mayroong real life experience na halimbawa ang mga bawat pagkakamali na nabanggit o mababanggit sa usapang ito. |
|
|
|
Suicide is for the weak
Agreed. If you believe in a god, kill yourself and enjoy heaven! Why stay here? Because of the mission to spread the word and broaden the sphere of influence of the said belief?  |
|
|
|
|
