the binding essence is that exchanges provide opportunities in general, and that will only lead to new problems that are more vulnerable, almost all large exchanges have committed bugs bounty, I believe it is indeed effective.
However, it is better if they offer a representative job to be employed internally because it will be more transparent to engage with insiders, and only compensate for public participation without having to publish the hackaton as often as possible.
|
|
|
memberikan informasi website di mana Anda mendapatkan gambar tersebut. Paling sederhana, Untuk lisensi Public Image dan tidak perlu atribusi khusus yang Anda ambil dari Wikimedia, setidaknya Anda mencantumkan Wikimedia pada gambar.
banyak media yang punya reputasi juga respek dengan ini, misal mencantumkan: lansiran dari..., atau mencantumkan sumber dengan tulisan kecil dibawah kanan/kiri foto. Jadi kalau hak cipta (copyright) tidak didaftarkan, tidak bisa dituntut pengadilan begitu gan?
garis besarnya begitu mas, dalam konteks dari apa yang sudah terpublikasi di google. Itu kan TOSnya terkait platform Blogger (blogspot.com).
hanya salah satu tos untuk blogger/google, mencakup segala bentuk kontent yang diduga dijiplak. btw mohon ijin tidak menjelaskan semuanya mas rico , keteranganku merupakan kajian ilmiah kampus 5-7 tahun yang lalu. mau komunikasi lebih banyak namun perlu disinkronkan dengan term yang baru.
|
|
|
I think without poloniex, digibyte can still continue to grow, so why should it matter that this is actually not worth broadcasting publicly, seeing politics in the crypto world is a bit annoying, but I don't support anyone here and also not a holder of digibyte, just hoping for problems This doesn't have to be big, I still see DGB in Bittrex and other large exchanges. I think it's good enough, I believe without Poloniex, Digibyte can still develop into big.
Poloniex is claimed to only contribute 1% of the dgb volume, of course this is insignificant compared to the dgb at ZBG, I consider to be a simple psywar, nothing else is interesting. But the strange thing is seen when Poloniex takes steps so quickly, hopefully they don't make meaningful blunders just because of strong criticism/suspicion.
|
|
|
-snip-
MANTAP!. nah, sekalian saya mau bertanya gan. Untuk image apakah ada lisensi FAIR USE? kalo dalam bentuk tulisan, sepemahaman saya sudah ada. Fair use hanya keperluan ethic formal . tuntutan nyata copyright hanya berlaku untuk karya(musik dsb), dan brand yang didaftarkan secara komersil di lembaga terkait, kalau art content di forum ini ethic berlaku lewat rule plagiarism. tulisan artikel dan gambar di internet dianggap non formal, tidak seketat karya ilmiah dsb. salah satu tos: https://support.google.com/blogger/answer/76315?hl=en&visit_id=637113033582627676-2113947416&rd=1ingat kasus calon sarjana kan, potoshop gambar banner toyota, atau merch clothes local yang niru 100% brand luar, tidak ada tuntutan royalty, hanya teguran menghapus/mengubah jika ada pelaporan, impact nyata berlaku pada reputasi yang bersangkutan.
|
|
|
There should be more than 200 coins that will die in the future. Because most just make concepts without running them, nothing can really be applied to real life. Maybe only a few percent of all altcoins can really be used, the rest is just speculation.
And another thing, the concept of one coin to another is almost certainly similar because yes they are trying to make a shortcut by copying an existing project.
Coins that have been dumped to the bottom and have a dead volume will not return, if they go up then they have to start the marketing concept again, or provide funds as an intermediary, IEO etc., or speculation only runs very short. The majority will become stone pebbles in the Desert and people are more happy with new quality coins and coins that are able to survive. Projects that look copying, but there is always something that has more value. For example, we are talking about coins that focus on logistics, similar transaction systems, but applications, marketing areas, and supporting partners are different. Their ability to increase traffic and volume will also determine whether it will end successfully or not.
|
|
|
I found this quality topic on twitter and it all caught my attention. I have seen that fiat is the currency of the Government and Bitcoin is the currency of the people, Can the Government Crash? if so the people cannot Crash neither, because so many people are not making good business from the fiat than in bitcoin, which have provided so much job opportunities for users who are online. Fiat will be replaced soon by bitcoin.
Share your thoughts
I think bitcoin cannot replace fiat money as a currency use, in a lot of countries they are using fiat money but have a different value just like a pesos or a dollar, in my opinion bitcoin cannot be the only currency in all over the world because different country has different standard other things might be cost or expensive in other country but not in other countries, maybe bitcoin is going to reply the fiat money but I don't think that fiat money is going to disappear if the bitcoin become a top currency I think fiat money is still in use. we have long been trapped in the understanding of the world economic caste, and it all started from the age of industrialization. If it's too complicated with that, we can take the equality of value held by gold as a comparison. fiat will still exist, but it will become a more modern digital entity, and bitcoin will run on both more complex functions, but will still refer to the fiat value equation, because it is not possible to form stable prices on btc without active legal policies.
|
|
|
Hating does not mean disrespect, the experience of each user is different, and many negative thoughts arise because the influence of BTC prices is not in line with short-term expectations that continue, and some of the rest respond to existing fundamentals.
If it remains balanced, it will be educative of every conversation that arises, and will become a shared understanding. The conversation about Nakamoto is also not too blasphemous, rather light communication that tends to be curious.
|
|
|
Pasti peserta art contest kemarin ga mikir jauh sampai ke fair use, atau anggap daur ulang bebas seperti meme editing . Dulu pernah mantau soal SOPA(stop online piracy act) & PIPA (protect ip act) di AS, namun akhirnya bias semenjak fair use muncul. Foto yang yang beredar di google rata2 tidak copyright jadi ketentuan pembajakan tidak sampai ke royalty. hanya protokol tentang dihapus atau tidak walau sudah dikomersilkan/didaur ulang, dan dengan/tanpa pencantuman sumber. Namun forum ini punya rule lebih ketat. Jadi setiap artikel/foto hendaknya cantumkan source biar aman.
|
|
|
update lagi bro, dah mau masuk ieo troy kan. Tambah referensi: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5176233.0kebetulah ga ikut kava, kucek ROI ATH usd paling kecil dari yang lain, ada yang masih tradingin kava sekarang? ga nyimak yang lain namun cukup puas trade matic dah masuk 400 satoshi.
|
|
|
Bisa jadi karena panik lihat harga btc sejak 2 tahun lalu dan akhirnya sekarang nyaman di koin stabil, manipulator besar jadi banyak berkurang. Kupikir koin2 ini juga kedepannya gampang jadi sasaran pemerintah melihat sifatnya bisa dikontrol sepihak. Bisa saja diakusisi penuh dan ikut regulasi baru, atau dilarang dan diganti dengan koin stabil resmi.
|
|
|
money laundering is not easy even with crypto, especially now that there are many exchanges that require the KYC identity, I think money laundering with money or with crypto is equally difficult except for those who are experts, in my opinion the government's ban on crypto is not due to money laundering, because money laundering was often done before crypto was created.
KYC on the exchange is not enough, they can use a mixer in large quantities without being noticed. Most of the money laundering cases that are revealed are because they were carried out in a hurry and in a large amount. case examples in 2018: https://www.coindesk.com/europol-nabs-11-in-crypto-drug-money-laundering-casethe government can track all unnatural transactions only from credit cards, or bank accounts of each suspect, and now of course they have been helped by KYC on the exchange, but I have never read that there are US police cooperating with bitfinex only because of alleged transactions money laundering goes to that exchange (for example).
|
|
|
if there are polls or reviews about gender from bitcoin users, I'm sure they will be more silent, even though there are a few, but they will not present themselves exclusively and only a few people know their true identity.
on social media, I have female friends who are interested in BTC, and they are still in the stage of studying by passive action, not daily traders, etc., just buying and waiting for news from each other's chats.
|
|
|
How many exchanges are left? If there are more than 10 left, it is only the consequences of competition.
Internal pressure from the government makes them unable to survive, exchanges such as binance, huobi and okex have even moved their company licenses first. There is almost no competition for crypto exchanges in China because the government remains in a position to ban it. Companies (biss) who seem to want to cooperate fully are also still not getting positive results and are dragged into other new cases.
|
|
|
the thing that is quite difficult to control in daily trading is a percentage income from it. You can earn 2% or even 5% of the assets you have, but when you get stuck at a price, then it can become unwanted trading. don't overdo it in daily trading, even the 5% profit is big enough. it's just that, there are many risks that need to be considered, such as sudden decreases that force us to hold coins for quite a long period of time.
to anticipate it, always set aside profits and trade again with the previous capital, for example, already get 5%, convert profit in tether. and return to doing the same with initial capital with a 5% target plus a 5% stop limit. if something bad happens, at least you have nothing to loss. Daily trading does require quick monitoring of changing charts, but if it is still in the same weekly range, fluctuations will always return to prices that are not too far away.
|
|
|
China is the big population country even it's they strong position in crypto industry that's why they dominated in the whole crypto currency platform. Any government can ban Bitcoin to remove money laundering act and other a lot of illegal activities but how government can be remove all cryptocurrencies? They haven't such a power to remove all crypto currencies.
the government cannot remove it, but can still control transaction/trading activities on their state exchanges. If this is effective, then other countries will also do the same thing, in the end many traders finally want something that is safe and comfortable in relation to exchange and crypto media that are not banned by the government.
|
|
|
I see that they have been facilitated by CME and BAKKT in futures trading, and not the spot market. If it goes well, then it should be a bullish sentiment because it does not only focus on the short term.
waves of funds from institutions are able to make the price of bitcoin very different from now, and certainly can reduce the level of manipulation in such a way from the regular market.
|
|
|
endingnya tetap minta akses wallet mantap benar scam2 sudah bertebaran di fb. Giveaway ga pernah cari user random kecuali memang pernah ngisi formulir mereka sebelumnya, jadi claim pun sudah tinggal distribusi. Mbak sri teliti benar sampai coba ngisi form, kalau aku sudah ga gubris lagi, yang kaya gini banyak via email. thanks infonya.
|
|
|
Banks have monetary policies that are supported by many things including bonds and taxes that can be more tightly regulated, they still have reserves to struggle in improving conditions, especially national banks that are supported by the government directly.
If they accept bitcoin without a strong design and are not fully stable, it will only be a time bomb and will be more difficult through the recovery process, and the biggest panic martyr will occur in their customers.
|
|
|
I chatted with many traders, most people who are suitable for crypto trading will throw away their focus on stock/other, and choose diversification only from crypto. They understand the risks and like more interesting fluctuations.
both types of investment have high complexity so they are not confused if they only choose one. So the level of comfort in a portfolio is based on comfort with strategies that often find profit effectiveness.
|
|
|
|