Latest posts of: nullius

Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 [26] 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 ... 128 »

501	Other / Meta / #FAIL Re: Do you want more or less freedom?	on: November 28, 2020, 06:43:02 PM
Epic #FAIL: Start a topic titled, “Do you want more or less freedom?”—and then enforce the Quote from: LoyceV on November 28, 2020, 08:44:30 AM Not Safe For Wife standard, when you are evidently married to this: Personal irony: I almost married the lady who first introduced me to Courbet. She was classy, a stunner in an evening dress. We spent hours day and night discussing poetry, ballet,^* and classical music; and she was a living enclopaedia of art history. She herself had posed nude for her own figure-drawing class at university, when she was an undergrad. And she didn’t have a problem with Courbet. Yes, I have some regrets. She would have been optimal for the production of heirs. * This was largely about her: Quote from: nullius on March 23, 2020, 02:29:04 PM IRL, I have been criticized for my gauche ignorance of ballet and ballroom dancing. Ordinarily, as a gentleman, I would not speak ill of a man’s wife in an Internet argument. But if you want to hide behind her, and she is a classless harridan who disrespects fine art, then she is fair game.

502	Economy / Reputation / Re: Reeeeeeeeee: nullius is a c—	on: November 28, 2020, 04:45:54 PM
Further replies will be made after a cleanup in Meta. cryptohunter, if you wrote regularly more in the manner of your latest post here, then perhaps more people would listen to you. Not many more—but who cares for the opinions of the masses? It is the thinkers who matter, not the blockheads. If you are not merely pulling a grandmaster troll by telling me whatever you may infer I want to hear, then excluding some wrongness that I’m sure you just had to toss at me and Lauda, that was actually an insightful post. sirazimuth, you and I are on the forum for completely different and mutually irreconcilable reasons. I will not make you be interested in all of the things that I post; and you will assuredly not make me uninterested in posting them. That is the great thing about free expression—if I have it, which I may not here, but anyway... eddie13, loth though I am to say this, I hope that nothing really bad befell TS. There are some people who deserve whatever ill may befall them—about whose demise I would laugh with Schadenfreude; but I would not say that about TS. He’s just a garden-variety trollish jerk with a dishonest streak who needs to get his a— kicked, which (if not inconvenient) I may do again^* if he returns. Also, f— you for underrating my c—iness compared to CH. B—. * To be clear, TS always came off as a fool opposing me. He only successfully got me excluded from DT by hypocritically hiding behind suchmoon—just as Mr “hacker” is s—ing up to suchmoon on this thread, and CH has not pointed that out to him. “Double standards”?

503	Economy / Reputation / Re: Nullian Self-Moderation Policy	on: November 28, 2020, 04:13:07 PM
Note to self: #234771 “suchmoon” believes that ban evasion is an acceptable means of responding to being personally banned from a venue. Quote from: suchmoon on November 28, 2020, 03:25:18 PM

504	Other / Politics & Society / Re: The Privacy Culture Manifesto	on: November 28, 2020, 12:55:05 AM
Moderation hat on: Much though I appreciate this discussion in itself, I respectfully request that the thread remain on topic. There are already numerous threads (including some of my own) for discussing the politics of the American Federal government. That is a top-down approach, and very specific to the United States. The question hereby is: *What bottom-up, grassroots social norms* are needed so that people demand privacy?** What can we do to make respect for privacy into “the new normal”? —Starting at home, and in local communities, and otherwise in everyday interactions? A good start may be to question why people continue to expose their social graphs and private communications a service whose founder is reported to have said, “They ‘trust’ me. Dumb fucks.” —And thereupon to ask: What acculturation, leadership, and peer pressure could push the herd-mentality masses to do otherwise?

505	Other / Politics & Society / Re: The Tragedy of the Mayflower	on: November 28, 2020, 12:44:54 AM
BUMP for the “holiday” weekend (which will be followed by “Cyber Monday”, and...).

506	Other / Meta / Hate speech against unpaid avatars	on: November 28, 2020, 12:29:06 AM
Quote from: decodx on November 27, 2020, 10:38:21 PM Quote from: Royse777 on November 27, 2020, 08:46:35 PM Or do not join a campaign that requires the avatar to be occupied. It's not too much of an option, is it? As someone whose unpaid avatar has been bowdlerized⁰ due to its explicit implications, I am deeply offended by your blatantly microaggressive prejudice against people who do not sell out their avatars for money.¹ Hateful words can hurt! With your toxic exclusionary attitude, it is as if you would erase us from existence! 😭 0. If my unexpurgated avatar still shows in your browser due to caching, please cover your eyes so that I do not get in trouble. Thanks. 1. The offer that I briefly put in my personal text still stands: I am willing to rent out my avatar for not less than 20999999.9769 BTC/year.

507	Other / Meta / Re: Do you want more or less freedom?	on: November 28, 2020, 12:13:05 AM
My request stands: Quote from: nullius on November 28, 2020, 12:00:19 AM Re: Do you want more or less freedom? Quote from: nullius on November 27, 2020, 04:20:14 PM Loyce, please add a poll option demanding a ban of people who, being accused of being cunts, reply with famous fine-art paintings of cunts. Thanks. —Notwithstanding: Quote from: nullius on November 28, 2020, 12:00:00 AM Link is NOT “NSFW”, unless your workplace prohibits you from viewing the websites of museums. Quote from: https://bitcointalk.org/modlog.php [...] Delete reply: Re: Do you want more or less freedom? in topic #5293277 by member #976210 [...]

508	Other / Meta / Ironically removed content re: ...museum artworks deemed “NSFW”?	on: November 28, 2020, 12:00:19 AM
Quote from: Bitcoin Forum A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator. Posts are most frequently deleted because they are off-topic, though they can also be deleted for other reasons. In the future, please avoid posting things that need to be deleted. « Sent to: nullius on: Today at 08:09:26 PM » « Sent to: nullius on: Today at 08:33:40 PM » « Sent to: nullius on: Today at 08:39:01 PM » Parts of one of the deleted posts, which in turn quoted parts of the two others: Re: Do you want more or less freedom? Quote from: nullius on November 27, 2020, 04:20:14 PM Loyce, please add a poll option demanding a ban of people who, being accused of being cunts, reply with famous fine-art paintings of cunts. Thanks. Subject: Re: Reeeeeeeeee: nullius is a cunt Quote from: nullius on November 27, 2020, 10:02:50 AM Despite my political and aesthetic disagreements with Courbet, I will defend this in Meta if Puritanical Americans whine for censorship of a painting that is currently displayed in the Musée d’Orsay in Paris: *Gustave Courbet, L’Origine du monde* (oil on canvas, 1866) [—REMOVED—] Exhibit 0: A cunt. Exhibit 1: The Musée d’Orsay [...] Quote from: nullius on November 27, 2020, 04:02:51 PM [...] WTF, are you John Ashcroft?** Or perhaps are you one of those people who irreparably damaged Renaissance artworks in European churches by effacing artistic displays of genitalia and/or female breasts? Would you Bowdlerize Shakespeare, too? Quote from: Shakespeare, The Tragedy of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark (modernized spelling for the ineducable peasants and proletarians here) [...famous Shakespearean pun about “country matters”...] [...] Some people wonder why I have become habituated to using my highlighter pen. I will illustrate here by example: My point was, of course, that if a painting is hanging in full public view in a major Parisian museum, and is displayed on that museum’s website (try my links!) with no 18+ check or other indicia of so-called “NSFW”, then I am sure it can embedded on this forum. [...helpful highlighting to assist with comprehension...] I even showed the museum itself, for a reason. Do you suggest that this Very Venerable and Serious Museum publicly, openly displays things that cannot be embedded in posts on the libertarian cypherpunk Bitcoin Forum? The above-linked Telegraph article, in pertinent part: Quote from: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/1383108/Curtains-for-nude-statue-of-justice.html Curtains for nude statue of justice By Toby Harnden in Washington 29 January 2002 • 00:01 am AMERICA'S puritanical attorney-general, John Ashcroft, has had the half-naked statue of the Spirit of Justice covered because he was annoyed at being photographed in front of the exposed right breast. Curtains costing £5,500 will now shield the aluminium art deco work - nicknamed "Minnie Lou" - and its companion, the Majesty of Justice, a male figure naked apart from a loincloth. [...] Last November, after announcing a restructuring of the department to cope with the threat of terrorism, Mr Ashcroft was presented with press pictures showing his serious visage next to the Spirit of Justice's breast. A coda for those who may be confused by modern false dichotomies: Unlike “conservatives”, who want to turn back the clock by about fifty years, or “paleoconservatives”, who want to go back about a hundred, I want to return to the Renaissance—or to classical antiquity. With a few exceptions, most of the nude artwork that I have posted is classical or (more or less) neoclassical—not Courbet, of all people; but Courbet is unavoidably a part of nineteenth-century art history, and is not pornographic or “NSFW”. —Unless famous museums are deemed to meet that description. I dispute that, which is why I am raising this issue in Meta.

509	Other / Meta / Are fine artworks in European museums deemed “NSFW” by forum rules?	on: November 28, 2020, 12:00:00 AM
A question that I ask because I do strive in good faith to heed the forum rules: Is the content of websites of famous European museums considered “NSFW” by Bitcointalk.org moderation policy? Link is NOT “NSFW”, unless your workplace prohibits you from viewing the websites of museums. Quote from: https://bitcointalk.org/modlog.php Delete reply: Re: Reeeeeeeeee: nullius is a cunt in topic #5293050 by member #976210 [...] Delete reply: Re: Do you want more or less freedom? in topic #5293277 by member #976210 [...] Delete reply: Re: Reeeeeeeeee: nullius is a cunt in topic #5293050 by Another question: Is my avatar permitted? Although it is exoterically an infinite zero, it has an esoteric meaning that is sexually graphic and explicit. Quote from: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=avatar It must be safe for work. —Yes, I am serious. I am well-known for double entendre and beyond: Onion-layered multiplicities of meaning. Inter alia, the green oval with a dot of my avatāra has always evoked and invoked the yóni opening to the liṅga at the moment of intromission, in accord with my private study of the kāmaśāstra.^* Quote from: nullius on April 24, 2020, 04:17:43 PM I have spent more time studying and practicing kāmaśāstra than science and technology! Now, why don’t you quote that, PM theymos, and ask him to ban me because I like sex, and I am not ashamed of it. * No, I did not even try to decline all these Sanskrit words tossed into an English sentence. Eh. 🤬 On another note, I request heavier moderation of rude trolls. Some foul-mouthed lowlife called me a “c—”, and I am deeply offended! Sincerely offended: Courtesy is important to me; and I am in principle against the use of anatomical terms as “dirty words”, on grounds that such usage defiles the cleanliness and sanctity of the human body. Naturally, what with this being the Internet, and what with my being a mature grown-up, I just rolled with the punches instead of demanding that my feelings be protected. But I admit, *my feelings* are hurt: I am shocked, outraged, and indignant! 😭 Where is the Bitcointalk.org Trust and Safety Team!?** What with this being a private forum, I will not repost the deleted content without permission. Rather, I do hereby as I promised: I am taking this up in Meta, in an appropriate manner. However, I will publish in Post #2 a brief excerpt of such deleted content as is—most ironic, and not only relevant, but essential to this discussion. — See you next Tuesday. —

510 Other / Beginners & Help / Re: [Merit] Hey Bitcoiners! Can You Send Encrypted Messages? on: November 27, 2020, 08:35:57 PM

I presume that OgNasty is away for the American Thanksgiving holiday. But this question is easy to answer:

Quote from: Marvelman on November 27, 2020, 07:42:06 PM

OgNasty, may I ask what was wrong with my message?
I apologize if I did something wrong.

Quote from: Marvelman on November 22, 2020, 08:37:23 PM

Code:

You suffered some sort of an encoding/escaping error. The two \u003d strings in the above quote should each be =.

Corrected:

Code: (marvelman_fixed.asc)

It indeed appears to be correctly encrypted to OgNasty’s keyid—although this cannot be proved for certain, without OgNasty’s secret key:

Code:

$ gpg -v -v < marvelman_fixed.asc
gpg: WARNING: no command supplied.  Trying to guess what you mean ...
gpg: armor: BEGIN PGP MESSAGE
# off=0 ctb=85 tag=1 hlen=3 plen=268
:pubkey enc packet: version 3, algo 1, keyid A338C617DE66E656
	data: [2048 bits]
gpg: public key is 0xA338C617DE66E656
# off=271 ctb=d2 tag=18 hlen=2 plen=101 new-ctb
:encrypted data packet:
	length: 101
	mdc_method: 2
gpg: encrypted with 2048-bit RSA key, ID 0xA338C617DE66E656, created 2014-04-24
      "OgNasty <askognasty@gmail.com>"
gpg: decryption failed: No secret key

HTH.

Quote from: OgNasty on November 26, 2020, 05:58:44 AM

^All that text and you failed to send an encrypted message...

Not only did I send an encrypted message: I showed the exact command that I used to encrypt it. I look forward to your response.

Quote from: nullius on November 26, 2020, 03:29:44 AM

Code:

[...]

The exact command that I used to encrypt the above message to OgNasty:

Code: (/bin/sh)

gpg -a -s -e -r 0xA338C617DE66E656 -r 0x5A00591B2F307E0C < 2020-11-26.ognasty.txt > 2020-11-26.ognasty.asc

511	Economy / Reputation / Re: Reeeeeeeeee: nullius is a cunt	on: November 27, 2020, 06:52:39 PM
Quote from: sirazimuth on November 27, 2020, 06:02:00 PM Quote from: nullius on November 27, 2020, 05:25:46 PM ...This thread is about me being a cunt. ... ..... well, I admire your honesty anyway.... You see, unlike most “people” who pretend to do Bitcoin, I take the divine mandate of Bitcoin seriously. So, who wants to attempt insulting me next? 🙃☮ * nullius badgers the hostile witness, who unwillingly and unwittingly attests his supreme mastery. Quote from: nullius on November 17, 2020, 11:53:32 PM Quote from: friends1980 on November 17, 2020, 09:47:25 PM Well, this time you haven't fed the trolls, you've fed nullius. May the gods have mercy on your soul. Quotable.

512	Economy / Reputation / Re: Reeeeeeeeee: nullius is a cunt	on: November 27, 2020, 05:25:46 PM
Quote from: suchmoon on November 27, 2020, 04:16:36 PM If I was a really snarky cunt 0. This thread is about me being a cunt. Not about you. Your post is an off-topic attempt to derail the thread. Quote from: suchmoon on November 25, 2020, 01:32:56 AM No self-mod and no rules here other than your post must be about nullius being a cunt. You are a rule-breaker and a hypocrite, to boot! But you do not deserve the high honour of being called a cunt on a thread started by you, for the purpose of your whining about me. 1. Please be advised that I have been retained to ~~shill for~~ represent the interests of Sarcasm. Please be further advised that when you were Quote from: nullius on November 27, 2020, 10:02:50 AM summarily FIRED! from Sarcasm’s signature campaign, your End User Licence to Snark was terminated pursuant to §31.37 of the terms thereof. Your attempts to abuse Sarcasm are in violation of Sarcasm’s intellectual property rights. Quote from: nullius on November 27, 2020, 10:02:50 AM ^^^ Image is of suchmoon’s signature, at the time that the quoted post was made. Be guided accordingly, etc., etc. 2. Stop “derailing” the topic title. I am much more than “a wee bit” of a cunt, figuratively speaking. You added no qualifiers when you started the thread—don’t chicken out now, pussy! Official guide to the application of vulgar idioms: nullius = cunt (extremely evil! Officially certified cuntiness, according to Bitcointalk Suchmoon’s Vision (BSV) and endorsed by suchmoon’s darling cryptohunter.) suchmoon = pussy (coward—but assuredly 🐁 not a cat!)

513	Economy / Speculation / [WO] Reeeeeeeeee: nullius is a cunt	on: November 27, 2020, 10:46:05 AM
Quote from: JayJuanGee on November 27, 2020, 08:53:50 AM Quote from: Lambie Slayer on November 27, 2020, 03:24:14 AM Quote from: JayJuanGee on November 26, 2020, 07:50:42 PM [ edited out] Happy Thankgiving, ya cunt. Aren't you a happy camper. Happy thanksgiving to you too, you non-cunt wannabe. Hey! According to Bitcointalk Suchmoon’s Vision (BSV), I, nullius, am the forum’s official cunt! There is a whole thread accusing me of being a cunt in the topic title—from someone who claims to have me on ignore. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5293050.0 My reply, with admission of figurative cuntiness: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5293050.msg55693619#msg55693619 Credit: My attempt to talk to CH follows a certain non-meanie example that I had seen in giving a fair shake to the bonesjones alt. Thus Jay, although you may still compete with me in WO for being a meanie, my lil selfie has you beat for being a cunt. Lambie, take notice. Quote from: JayJuanGee on November 27, 2020, 08:53:50 AM I must be feeling charitable, today for some reason. Wow, I have a lock on being the Wall’s #0 meanie, too.

514	Economy / Reputation / mdayonliner has returned	on: November 27, 2020, 10:19:38 AM
Quote from: mday_alt on April 23, 2019, 06:22:56 PM I am in the process of willingly locking my mdayonliner account. I will update this post once the lock process is done. There will be no more posts from this account too. I needed to get theymos's attention and I got his response so there are no need for waiting one and two more weeks. Quote from: mdayonliner on November 25, 2020, 04:30:06 PM After leaving (reason) the forum and taking a long break, I have decided to re-join the community. Thanks to the recovery team and hello to all! Protip: If you want or need to leave the forum for awhile, just do it without locking out your account. I am surprised that the forum’s recovery team returned to you an account that you had locked out intentionally. Whilst you have been so kind as to drop by, don’t forget to deliver a lecture to suchmoon about her déclassé means of misbehaving as a Quote from: suchmoon on November 25, 2020, 04:44:12 PM drama queen

515	Economy / Reputation / Re: Achtung! suchmoon = Wannabe Mrs Cryptohunter ❤️ ❤️ ❤️	on: November 27, 2020, 10:06:14 AM
❕ RESERVED by Order of the High Priest of Nullianity.

516	Economy / Reputation / Achtung! suchmoon = Wannabe Mrs Cryptohunter ❤️ ❤️ ❤️	on: November 27, 2020, 10:05:59 AM
Context: “Re: Reeeeeeeeee: nullius is a cunt” (a déclassé whine thread by suchmoon) Quote from: (probable^H^H^Hobvious cryptohunter alt, named in honour of Lauda) on November 26, 2020, 01:44:46 PM It is fun to watch this. I knew it would happen. Undoubtedly nullius is a cunt, however this is not the root of the conflict between suchmoron and nerdius. Suchmoron views nerdius as a cunt for a few reasons. None of which have anything to do with being an actual cunt. 1. Nerdius can convincingly ( to imbeciles which make up 99% of meta and rep posters) appear both intelligent and cultured. Suchmoon doesnt like that and hates being revealed as stupid. It knows nullius is more technically versed too. Nullius being kind of a very poor mans AM. 2. Nerdius can garner a lot of praise and grovelling respect from the dregs that also slobber over suchmoron. ( not that burger flipper direwolf that is suchmoons chief assmuncher or alt) 3. Nerdius will stand up to suchmoron. In short nerdius is casting a shadow over suchmorons light here. Suchmoon doesnt like not being the centre of attention. Quote from: suchmoon on November 26, 2020, 02:50:25 PM ^^^ Image quoted at a sane size, and now stored not under suchmoon’s control. Get a room, the two of you! suchmoon, I know that you are too shrewd and calculating not to understand that your “DO NOT FEED THE CRYPTOHUNTER” pic is the ultimate feeding for him. He loves it! And you know it. You are not that fucking dense: You are feeding him deliberately, you sleazy two-faced cretin. You are a troll; and feeding cryptohunter this way is your way of trolling with “plausible deniability”. N.b. that since you pretend to have me on ignore (whilst creating new threads about me—LOL! pathetic), I am stating this for the audience. As I do with all of my posts about you lately (and one planned upcoming). For you are subtler than the average troll, suchmoon. You are more cunning than cryptohunter. You have fooled me in the past. Others need to see your true face. Thank you for showing it to them: You are the bride of cryptohunter, a match made in Hell. Quote from: KaneVWE on October 20, 2020, 03:55:40 PM Quote from: nullius on October 20, 2020, 03:43:41 PM Quote from: suchmoon on October 20, 2020, 03:42:54 PM Thanks. So stop bumping the damn thing. I love this post. With one exception. Telling suchmoon to stop posting her pic here is not permitted. She may post it in my self moderated threads at my discretion. [...] Nullius can post but don't tell hot bbw beast wrestlers like suchmoon what to do on my threads. [...] If suchmoon stops now because you told her too that is really unsportsmanly. ❤️ ❤️ ❤️ Quote from: KaneVWE on October 20, 2020, 08:18:58 PM @ nerdius - no more disrespectful comments to forum legends like OG or I'll have to ban you from this valuable and informative thread. Also no more ordering my fav BBW around. If she wants to post her little pictures on my self moderated threads then I will permit it as and when it suits me. ❤️ ❤️ ❤️ Quote from: KaneVWE on October 21, 2020, 08:49:35 AM Ah that reminds me. Suchmoon will never win our posting/deleting battle. There can be only 1. ^^^ It takes 2 to tango. This has been coming for awhile: Quote from: nullius on October 21, 2020, 11:36:26 PM In a CH troll thread which suchmoon has been feeding by pretending to tell others not to feed it (ill-behaviour that I have not yet had time to address adequately), Local rules. Will be enforced. For the purposes thereof, both of the two above-named lovebirds are being accused on this thread. However, posts that substantially consist of the cryptohunter-feeding pic will be deleted regardless.

517	Economy / Speculation / Re: [WO] Corn talk .org sleeps at Turkey Time	on: November 27, 2020, 04:43:01 AM
Quote from: philipma1957 on November 27, 2020, 02:47:35 AM Market got better. Have some pumpkin pie. And stay in New Jersey. `:-)` Lambie, a cordial protip from my own perspective as a flame-warrior: Put your post and Jay’s post side-by-side. Compare objectively. One of you comes off as reasonably intelligent, and the other comes off as just wildly slinging mud. If you take aim at someone who can express himself well, then you need to increase your calibre. Using myself as an example, observe this contrast: Some abject loser recently insulted me incoherently. I told him that a dog fucked his mother, and then proceeded to humiliate him thoroughly. He then left the forum. (LOL, by the way—the same dog also fucked Mnuchin’s bitch wife.) Some of the shrewder members of DT have a bone to pick with me. When convenient, I point out to others their dishonesty, their sleaziness, and their hypocrisy. I do so in cogent terms. That means fewer cusswords, and more substance. —N.b. that I am not comparing them to Jay; I think that Jay seems honest and decent. The analogue here would be explaining why his strategy is suboptimal for his financial goals—not merely from a few bad trades, but overall, in the long term. Jay, consider this to be my lil contribution to the quality of debate on the Wall.

518	Economy / Speculation / [WO] Corn talk .org sleeps at Turkey Time	on: November 27, 2020, 01:30:41 AM
Quote from: explorer on November 27, 2020, 01:04:54 AM Corn ain't quite dead yet. What will fake news have to talk about, I wonder? Murican turkeys are now busy eating corn on the cob. The Wall Observer is not dead, but sleeping.

520	Other / Politics & Society / Re: Are people dying from stupidity, or the results of democratic epistemology?	on: November 26, 2020, 11:52:30 PM
Quote from: o_e_l_e_o on November 25, 2020, 04:05:06 PM Quote from: Shagufta3 on November 20, 2020, 05:24:18 PM share your opinion Opinions are irrelevant. All that matters are facts. Nonsense! Please share your opinion in my new poll! Quote from: nullius on November 26, 2020, 11:39:38 PM Quote from: nullius on January 21, 2020, 11:02:45 PM everybody is entitled to an opinion

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 [26] 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 ... 128 »