 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 »
|
|
3
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: BYTEBALL: Totally new consensus algorithm + private untraceable payments
|
on: November 05, 2017, 02:52:24 AM
|
Question: Can the contract language in byteball handle crosschain atomic swaps? Bitcoin's lightning network Atomic Swaps are working now on Bitcoin Cash, Litecoin, Decred, possibly Vertcoin, Particl, and there are different types of atomic swaps (not requiring Lightning) for other networks: Komodo, ETH, ETC, maybe Waves, Steem / Bitshares and others I would expect? Atomic swaps can be done on Byteball. It is one of the many features. Yes, but can the contracts be configured for cross chain swaps (seems this would be obvious)? Maybe, has anyone ever done it? |
|
|
|
|
4
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: BYTEBALL: Totally new consensus algorithm + private untraceable payments
|
on: November 04, 2017, 10:54:10 PM
|
Question: Can the contract language in byteball handle crosschain atomic swaps? Bitcoin's lightning network Atomic Swaps are working now on Bitcoin Cash, Litecoin, Decred, possibly Vertcoin, Particl, and there are different types of atomic swaps (not requiring Lightning) for other networks: Komodo, ETH, ETC, maybe Waves, Steem / Bitshares and others I would expect? |
|
|
|
|
8
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: BYTEBALL: Totally new consensus algorithm + private untraceable payments
|
on: August 28, 2017, 05:19:39 AM
|
1) Can I chat another user's byteball address, or does the user have to send me a pairing code?
2) Can the pairing code be used by more than one person / address? Like, could I put a paring code in my sig line?
1. Only pairing code allows to pair and therefore to chat. 2. Sure. Otherwise we won't be able to pair with the exchange bot. There are 392 people there now. Thanks for the answers... heh... and I am one of the 392 from the wiki link. hahah... should have figured out #2 Thanks again! |
|
|
|
|
10
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] [ICO] [NMS] [byteball] {Crypto Intelligence as-a-service}
|
on: August 25, 2017, 04:06:59 AM
|
|
If you need it, I can write cheesy English very well. Brilliant fluid mindfull's of poetic satisfaction are best served with succulently* interesting yet well presented bites of technical elucidation.
* Succulently - not really a word, me thinks.
Other prowess:
- Versed in all the arts of search and organic domination.
- Intriguingly good at understanding and communicating abstract technical detail.
- Willing to be paid in crypto.
By the way, I like your project as well and am working on my own byteball based wonder. We shall see if it comes to life with a little lightning...
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Speculation (Altcoins) / Re: What's happening when there is a massive buyin?
|
on: July 05, 2017, 12:57:03 AM
|
It just another pumping group, The massive adoption will make the coin will be stable as you can see with the bitcoin after some countries are tries to added bitcoin as legal payment. The chart has told me if that's obviously true. It's pure pump and the group dump it again just in a second. That looks very odd in my opinion and it was too far from the massive adoption.
Right, I agree. I assume this is not a pump group, but a single buyer. There are many institutional traders that have access to this kind of money. But the thing I cannot understand is how they get their money out. Third parties (except for bots) cannot even buy in fast enough to take advantage of this. As a matter or fact, that is all I can figure: maybe the trader has identified certain bot patterns, and is taking advantage of a bot that cannot understand massive buyins. |
|
|
|
|
15
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [Mining OS] SimpleMining.net - Easy to use GPU MINING Operating System
|
on: June 18, 2017, 04:27:53 AM
|
You are paying him $2 a month for whatever product he has created so far. You and I both know that payment only started about 20 days ago... before that it was completely free.
My recommendation is simply that you offer him more... $85/hr is what my mechanic charges to fix my Tahoe. I figure he's worth at least that.
If you are paying your mechanic 85$ / hr you are being screwed big time... My mechanic is a badass. He opens shop at 4am. If I have my truck to him at that time, its ready to pickup by noon. My truck has all kinds of mods and runs great all the time... because of him. A couple of times he has made a mistake or missed something that made it so I had to drive my wife's Honda. Guess what? He made it right. He reminds me of Tytanick. That is what I am communicating here. I love people like that. |
|
|
|
|
18
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [Mining OS] SimpleMining.net - Easy to use GPU MINING Operating System
|
on: June 17, 2017, 07:40:14 PM
|
Tytanick,
Several of us have posted about our ongoing issue with unstable cards that started a couple days ago, and with the exception of one dismissive post, you have refused to address this issue. I'm happy that you are opening your OS to new customers with the introduction of Nvidia support, but how about a little support for your established client base? Who knows, the problem may be caused by a third party, such as Claymore, but there is no way to tell as long as you ignore our concerns.
Offer him (or someone) money to help you troubleshoot. He is not being funded to develop this... its all on him if it fails. He has no malice toward you, he just has time to either develop or to trouble shoot individual cases. Development is (obviously) more productive for him. Someone here said that moving to Claymore 9.5 solved the issues, Tytanick himself said that he prefers 8.1. I actually find that 9.4 is stable and that it gets more shares than 9.5... Now, YOU go and take some time to try different options and get back with a more complete analysis so that he (and others here) can better understand your issue. I and others tried changing Claymore versions, it didn't help, and wrote about our efforts here. You are right, I missed your post saying that you tried 9.5 and switching pools. That's useful. As for your suggestion to offer him money, I am already paying him.
You are paying him $2 a month for whatever product he has created so far. You and I both know that payment only started about 20 days ago... before that it was completely free. My recommendation is simply that you offer him more... $85/hr is what my mechanic charges to fix my Tahoe. I figure he's worth at least that. Besides, my and others' problems arose precisely [with] an update. As I noted in a previous post, this does not definitively establish that his update is the cause, but it means it is a damn good place to start.
I agree. Actually, better error logging to the console would be cool. It would help us all. |
|
|
|
|
Right? If so, hella yes! If not, heh, oh well.
