|
Собранная хроника по попыткам внедрения системы рангов в разное время, говорит о том, что необходимость в её существовании была. Правда, реализация системы рангов была не совсем эффективной, но при этом шел процесс по совершенствованию и исправлению ошибок. Тем, кто начинают принимать участие на форуме в качестве новичка, должны понять, что усиление требований применимо ко всем. Опытный пользователь с большим стажем и высоким рангом также понимает, что новичок проходит период обучения, и как любому начинающему будет оказана поддержка. А заручиться поддержкой новичек сможет тогда когда его публикация будет иметь смысл, полезность, информативность для таких же как он, начинающих так и завсегдатаев форума.
|
|
|
|
There is 18.5 million BTC in circulation right now, more than 1 million BTC is lost or in dormant addresses, the biggest crypto funds and exchanges keep buying it. What happens if just a few whales will buy and control them all?
Let's imagine. If bitcoin were materialized in the form of a monetary unit minted and made of gold, on the territory of the ancient country of the Incas, then collecting and completely buying up all the coins would make sense for a philatelist. The reality is different for bitcoin, just like for a whale. Bitcoin is a digital asset that is more beneficial for the whale as a source of enrichment and replenishment of the bank account (s) in Switzerland. There is a means to make a profit on an ongoing basis, then it doesn't make sense for whales to completely buy a cue ball at all. |
|
|
|
|
It is high time to enter the era of digital currency (the era is at its initial stage in the countries of the African continent), which is difficult to manage and which is more effective in combating lawlessness, violence and police brutality.
|
|
|
|
XRP: The best advanced blockchain technology is available in XRP for the global payments.
ETN: Electroneum is a unique project, There are over a billion unbanked people with no digital payment method. No Visa. No Mastercard. No PayPal. No Apple Pay. Every day, Electroneum (ETN) is helping people around the world pay for goods and services, both in-store and online.
Both currency are so good currency but which better for payments
So please drop your opinion & experience
The first thing to do is to proceed from trading preferences, listing on stock exchanges, and daily trading volume. Here is the undisputed leader of the Ripple, according to all of the above criteria. In essence, like a payment system: XRP leads again. Based on the general information about the objectives of the ETN and the audience coverage plan (according to the plan 1 billion, now - 4 million people) for the period from 2017 to the present day, it is 0.4% of those in need. There is a dubious need for ETN. The choice is more than obvious. |
|
|
|
In the process of trying to be a future whales you could lost everything,trust me this got me no where and I realized that I've lost tons of money because I was never contented, be smart and always take advantage of any project that brings you profit, do not stare at your wallet and say 'im gonna be rich in 3 years later' this is 1% out of 100% chance that it's ever going to happen, remember, been rich isn't the most important part of our lives but living a good life is.
If you do not know what the result of your investment should be, do not take part, take a break and start a new search. You found an interesting idea that brings you to a consensus, while not promising huge benefits, but guaranteeing a stable profit, which is similar to your ultimate goal - try it. |
|
|
|
-//-
НО: Непонятно...касается ли это крипты, битка или совсем других "цифр".
Удивительно, что Китай еще раньше не начал создавать подобного толка "законопроекты" по борьбе с электронными деньгами, читай "суррогатом". Не первый год электронные денежные средства существуют. А то что они успешно затабуируют любые виды средств, что также и касаемо криптовалют, не регулируемых через Народный банк, нет сомнений. Отдельно позобавил пункт что "законопроект находится на стадии общественных консультаций". При их государственном строое, социализме, решение за Компартией. |
|
|
|
|
Путь для достижения новых рангов и званий становиться далеко не простым. Требования и правила становяться более жесткими, соттветсвенно и времени на получение нового ранга затрачивается существенно больше. Но, как бы там нибыло, ценность советов и рекомендаций людей, получивших и достигших новый уровень, стала еще более авторитетней как для новичков, так и для олдов. bakasabo, Smartprofit, icopress - поздравляю! Заслуженно!
|
|
|
|
It's not hard work to join Airdrops I guess that's why many refer to them as free money, you just need to follow the project social media accounts like facebook and twitter and do some retweeting, this won't take much of your time, can't be compare to bounties that takes weeks and months
This is the main point for involving the maximum number of participants through the airdrop system: obtaining benefits with the minimum of effort. Most often, tokens received through airdrops add to your crypto portfolio numerically and at the same time will have no value - they will remain just garbage. But in general, airdrops as marketing - working well. |
|
|
|
I am a regular participant in signature programs and I find that they do not help projects. The signature program is inferior to Twitter, Facebook, Telegram, Youtube Video ... because it only affects the Bitcointalk forum. Other social networks have more users and certainly bring more advertising value.
In what you wrote, there is a place to be, but partially. The bitcoin talk forum effectively promotes projects through signatures. First of all, this is due to the profile and narrow focus of the forum. It discusses the basics, development and promotion of projects by people who have knowledge since the inception of blockchain and cryptocurrencies. Therefore, social networks are thieves in importance. |
|
|
|
Мне интересно, а кто какую пропорциональную зависимость ставит себе в паре BTC/ETH? Насколько реальна постоянная цифра 0.1 BTC за 1 ETH? То есть если биткоин теоретически может покорить в этом году отметку 20к$ может ли эфириум рвануть вверх до 2к$ (о цене в 500 долларов я думаю вопрос можно считать закрытым).
Мне кажется, что цифра 0.1 BTC за 1 ETH уже нереальна в принципе вообще, ни как постоянная, ни как временная цифра. Последний раз такое было в январе 2018, с тех пор соотношение только падало. И нет никаких причин, которые бы снова вытянули соотношение 1 к 10. Постоянные переносы 2.0 и отсутствие внятных решений по решению проблем масштабируемости этому не поспособствуют. Думаю, что даже если биток снова пробьет двадцатку килобаксов, то эфиру светит максимум 600-650, не более. Увы, но все пока идет к этому. Идет постепенная тендеция снижения шансов, что соотношение битка и кефира равное 1:10, маловероятно. Как автор и говорит, что предпослыок нет - сухие обещанияв остатке о масштабируемости и 2.0. Тесты сетей - хорошо, а вот результат пока особо на рынке крипты не заметен. Думаю, что девы сами понимают это, и со временем найдут решение эффективное и котоорое даст отличный результат. |
|
|
|
Depends on how they do it. Normally the idea is not to increase the credibility but it is to increase the marketing of it, you would want more and more people to be interested in the project you do and when you are giving money to people for signature campaigns you are getting a lot in return, people all over bitcointalk will be hearing about your project which will create this "demand" for your project, not a ton but at least people will hear about it and know about it even if they do not get involved and a bit of them will get involved as well.
Of course, the expectation of getting more profit from investments in a particular project is normal. Do you want more confidence and credibility from the project? See who wears the signature, their rank on the bitcointalk's forum and their trust ratings, read why the trust rating was increased. I noticed that the chances of getting a good return on investments in projects, the signatures of which are worn by people with a positive trust, their projects are successful and work further. There may be exceptions, as in any rule. |
|
|
|
First I will check the projects website if it is properly done or just a piece of crap. Second is their product or application if it is really working or not. Third is the roadmap of the project that will give us hint whether one of those written in there actually is happening or in progress. Fourth is the idea of the project whether it is applicable or useful in the long run. Fifth is the project team of course because through them we can check their capability to do the job done. If you can see that they are active or they are participating community discussions maybe the project is legit but that is not really an assurance whether the project is worth investing in. Just make your own due deligence in choosing the right project to jump in.
The steps that you are mentioning are not wrong however if it was up to me I will put checking the project team above all, after all there are projects that may not be as groundbreaking as some others and yet if they have good developers willing to work for years on the project you will eventually get to see good results, on the other hand even if the idea behind a project is innovative and everything seems in order if the developers are lazy and irresponsible most likely that project will never develop successfully. Of course, will the project be of high quality and successful when a group of like-minded people donate their personal time to improve, modify and in-depth analysis of the mistakes of the phased creation of the project. Moreover, as you said, the expectation of the investor's result can be encouraged by a team that has worked for many years, or by losing investments from those projects where the developers promised more, but did the work from the promises at least. Either the project is closed at the final stage. The best depends on the focused, hard work of a team that can challenge the challenges that come with a project. You must have to an iron willpower and endurance. But a heavy and debilitating brainstorm brings good results. |
|
|
|
Following PayPal information, Venmo allows payment of its services in BTC, ETH and a few other tokens, the price of BTC has increased sharply, sometimes surpassing $ 13,000 and is still holding at $ 12900. But why is the market reacting so positively? BTC can reach $ 20000 after PayPal, Venmo accept payments in BTC, ETH?
You shouldn't be under the delusion that the economies of the leading countries will instantly begin the transition to work with crypto. Requirements from regulators are not softened, and there are no loud statements yet. But as positive news for the market, Paypal's allowing work with BTC, LTC, ETH and BCH affected, but did not quite live up to expectations. |
|
|
|
|
The creator of the theme started with a small, but sure step - a survey from those who haven't any tools for a long time and have gone through the stages of mistakes, losses, useless investments. Having received useful information, he'll generalize for himself and draw conclusions about future investments. Any beginner should initially come up with a deep understanding and awareness that the risk of losing investments is great, even with the possessions of the same BTC or ETH. You need to start working with them, thereby cutting back on your ambitions for maximum profit in a short period of time.
|
|
|
|
|
In fact, airdrops can be said to be part of an existing bounty company or a company that will launch after a while. And filling out Google forms, subscription requirements at the offiсial groups bounty companies and other - formalism, more suitable for reporting and analytics of the correct or not path of development of the bounty company.
|
|
|
|
|
Confidence in one or another ICO, even without reaching the signature, can be justified by the rule of careful study of the project. This should be the rule. If in doubt, leave the ICO for later or mark it as unwanted. And the signature and wearing it is an advertising move to attract potential investors, as well as to attract new participants to promote the project. Something like this.
|
|
|
|
|
Since the beginning of the pandemic and its current active phase (more than half a year has passed), I watched the tokens and coins that reacted negatively to the pandemic's situation. The decision was not made immediately, but I think it was right: part of the cryptocurrency portfolio was sold at a profit by me. The smaller part remains history. The heavyweights crypto have shown their best side, fluctuations in the market before and during the panademia are common. By doing this, they only strengthened their confidence in their presence and the correctness of the analysis.
|
|
|
|
|
At the moment, too little time has passed to give a final assessment or present an award such as "Golden Year of Crypto". It was just a stage in a revolution in the global economy. The highest point has not yet been. It's just that not everyone understands and understands the importance of cryptocurrencies in the modern digital world. It will take time for those who have doubts about investing in cryptocurrencies to take part. Only by covering the maximum number of participants can conclusions be drawn.
|
|
|
|
В итоге BNB сейчас откатился обратно к тем же значениям, что и до пампа и всех этих стейкингов ради BEL и WING. Кстати WING разочаровал, что то только падает и расти видимо вообще не собирается. Не знаю, вырастет ли еще BNB?
В отличи от большинства монет, бнб как раз удержался при небольшом движении битка. А ведь так. За последние три месяца BNB планомерно идет в рост, немного апается от битка, хотя и объемы капы уменьшаються, периодически стабилизируясь. Что же, подзабыл о BNB, а теперь стоит рассмотреть стратегию по владению BNB. |
|
|
|
Yes and the day is not far away when people will stop investing into new projects and moreover the will be no participants for new projects if the current trend of scamming, mismanagement continues to exist. It's high time that we need to stop entertaining scam projects by validating their entry into every single crypto related forum as well as exchanges. We have seen a lot of altcoins ending up as dead coin due to the short sighted plan of the developers.
Exactly. Smoothly, but the stage of weeding out useless projects that lead to nowhere will come, we can say that it is already underway. ISO, the failed ones, their mistakes, unsolved problems, will be studied by a generation who will fix them and create a useful and useful product without fraud, deceit and empty promises. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
