Bitcoin Forum
June 29, 2024, 03:13:07 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10]
 91 
 on: Today at 09:54:31 AM 
Started by Findingnemo - Last post by Hatchy

The problem with fiat all started when government and banks became too greedy and went on printing too much fiat, causing it to have less worth due to excess supply. Money is meant to be scares as if there's supplus, it becomes a problem for the economy of a country. How? A single man can decide to keep so much of their fiat locked up somewhere and try manipulating the whole economic system. Every common man from his child hood to becoming an adult had a single currency and some countries tries to teach them the history of their fiat in basic school. Still they can't fully understand the mystery behind fiat system and why it continues being a bit complicated. Bitcoin is new but still we can't compare it to fiat. The idea about decentralization has made Bitcoin stand out from all other currencies out there as no one, not even the government can control the system making it have less complications from confused leaders who try to manipulate the market system thereby causing fiat to drift alongside them.

 92 
 on: Today at 09:54:17 AM 
Started by acme89 - Last post by Cricktor
I'm not sure if this scheme is actually great. It looks overly convoluted to me and frankly I don't know why it's that much layered, to be honest. @satscraper could you explain what kind of attack vectors you try to remedy or your reasoning with such a multi-layered approach?

Then indeed more points of potential failure are introduced, at first glance. The hardware keys would need copies otherwise you're pretty much screwed if you've only one and this sole one gets damaged, stolen or lost. (OK, after actually reading SEED storage on digital media., you use three hardware keys from Yubico, so it seems there's redundancy.)

I hope you've a hell of a good instruction manual for those who are supposed to inherit your stuff should something bad happen to you. And don't forget, you know your scheme well enough now, you constructed it. Years later and without much use, this could change as human memory is a fragile and changing thing. For those not involved in your scheme, instructions would need to be much more elaborate.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not per se against digital storage but I'd like to understand why such paths are walked and to what problems it's aimed to be a valid solution. People need to understand why handling such precious data like mnemonic recovery words and/or mnemonic passphrase on digital devices is potentially dangerous and how to do it safely.

And don't do fancy and complicated procedures just for the sake of it and because you can. There should to be a clear purpose and need for every layer of protection!

 93 
 on: Today at 09:45:09 AM 
Started by krishnaverma - Last post by BitGoba
Bitcoin is very young, its market cap is still very small, and daily trading volume is low at only 30-40 billion dollars. Most people don't understand what Bitcoin is, which affects its volatility. Due to this lack of understanding, we experience panic selling, but this is changing over time. Volatility is decreasing and will continue to decrease as time goes on. When it reaches a larger market cap, Bitcoin will likely move in correlation with gold.

 94 
 on: Today at 09:43:22 AM 
Started by krishnaverma - Last post by chigo
That's what I'm waiting for. Because with Bitcoin dropping 10-20%, it means I have the opportunity to buy bitcoin at a cheaper price and I can save more money than I would have spent otherwise.


 95 
 on: Today at 09:37:49 AM 
Started by larry_vw_1955 - Last post by BitGoba
that's why bitcoin struggles once it gets to about $70,000 because no one is really using it for any real world use cases, they are just hodling. hoping to sell it for more than they bought it.
"Hodling" is a real-world use case lol. I don't really know why a lot of people are so against holding as if investing in an asset that you think will increase is a bad thing.


that's why i'm starting to think that ethereum will eventually overtake bitcoin in usefulness in the real world since ethereum seems to be upgrading their network and really pushing the envelope. not that i'm a huge fan of ethereum but the writing is on the wall about that. eth has more development efforts going into it than bitcoin for sure.
Because both assets have a different use case. Bitcoin's schtick is an asset that has a network and codebase that's so secure that you wouldn't even need to be updated to what's happening every month.

Ethereum, on the other hand, is a decentralized applications platform so they need to make updates frequently with the risk of having errors/failures/exploits.


Many people don't understand what Bitcoin is and what altcoins are. Altcoins are like tech companies with their own founders and CEOs. Bitcoin is a decentralized monetary network, the apex predator. Bitcoin doesn't compete with any altcoin, most of which are scams, but rather with gold and real estate

 96 
 on: Today at 09:30:39 AM 
Started by larry_vw_1955 - Last post by BitGoba
https://cointelegraph.com/news/bitcoin-activity-lowest-level-since-2010

Juan Pellicer, a senior researcher at IntoTheBlock, attributes Bitcoin’s decreasing wallet activity rate to weaker retail participation than in past cycles.


that's why bitcoin struggles once it gets to about $70,000 because no one is really using it for any real world use cases, they are just hodling. hoping to sell it for more than they bought it.

that's why i'm starting to think that ethereum will eventually overtake bitcoin in usefulness in the real world since ethereum seems to be upgrading their network and really pushing the envelope. not that i'm a huge fan of ethereum but the writing is on the wall about that. eth has more development efforts going into it than bitcoin for sure.


Don't take seriously what you read on Cointelegraph. Cointelegraph is a propaganda service for promoting scam shitcoins. They are scammers.

Activity on the Bitcoin network is at an all-time high, the mempool is full, all blocks are full, and there are 250,000 transactions pending.

Check it yourself

https://mempool.space/

Activity on the Bitcoin Lightning Network is also close to the all-time high from 2021. In the Lightning Network, 5,200 bitcoins worth over 300 million dollars are locked.

https://mempool.space/lightning


ETH is highly centralized and very risky. You have to trust a group of people led by Vitalik Buterin not to rug pull you and leave you with nothing.


ETH, besides being highly centralized and, in my opinion, a scam, has very high inflation, and you never know when the team in control will change the supply policy and print more ETH for themselves. Be very careful and don't put significant funds into ETH because you never know when they might rug pull.

That's why I only trust Bitcoin and don't use altcoins


 97 
 on: Today at 09:28:41 AM 
Started by Pmalek - Last post by Pmalek
I would not expect durable hardware wallet and therefore, prepare money in your pockets.
Of course not. Trezor, like any other hardware wallet manufacturer, makes money by selling its products. If their customers don't buy their hardware wallets every couple of years, Trezor won't make the money they need and want. They can hardly expect a constant influx of new users who buy a device for the first time and only one time. So, they have to sell a new gadget to their existing userbase every couple of years to remain profitable. They will introduce just enough new features and options to call it a new device that provides you with something extra, but nothing too fancy that will last forever. And in 2, 3, or 5 years, they will press repeat and do it all over again. 

 98 
 on: Today at 09:25:50 AM 
Started by larry_vw_1955 - Last post by Don Pedro Dinero
Juan Pellicer sounded quite Spanish to me, and as I see in 'about us' all the team have Spanish names but are based in Miami, so they could easily be Cuban expats or descendants of Cubans.

that's why bitcoin struggles once it gets to about $70,000 because no one is really using it for any real world use cases, they are just hodling. hoping to sell it for more than they bought it.
"Hodling" is a real-world use case lol. I don't really know why a lot of people are so against holding as if investing in an asset that you think will increase is a bad thing.

Well, if everyone holded I don't know what value bitcoin would have, as no one would want to trade it, even if they believed it had a lot of value. This is an extreme case that will never happen, obviously, but the richest economies are those where the most goods and services circulate, whether they are exchanged directly for fiat or other assets such as bitcoin.

 99 
 on: Today at 09:24:32 AM 
Started by Jean_Luc - Last post by NotATether
Can anyone explain why a sloppy modular multiplication is used? The 3rd step is missing, otherwise there exist probability of an incorrect result. Or is it proven that only 2 steps were sufficient (I doubt it)?

Since no one answered, I will assume it's taken for granted that the multiplication used by JLP is correct (2-folding reduction steps). However, according to page 15 of this research paper:

https://eprint.iacr.org/2021/1151.pdf

under the analysis of "Sloppy reduction" it is proven that unless a correctness check is performed, then you need a 3rd reduction step.

Otherwise, the modular multiplication reduction has a chance (around one in 2**193) to be incorrect, because:

Quote
Thus, if sloppy reduction is applied to a randomly chosen number in the interval [0, R2 − 1], the probability of an incorrect result is about r(r−1) / 2N

There is a missing potential carry that is assumed it can never happen, after the 2nd reduction. And no one can explain it.

I do recall JLP himself writing that it's using projective coordinates in the ecmath. So I guess for his modular multiplication implementation too (this is the same for VanitySearch).

In such a coordinate system, a different variable holds the divisor that's accumulated during the multiplication steps of the other two variables, so that reduction can be done much much later (as it is still expensive, even if you use heavily optimized algos of binary GCD and 2x52 legs).

Since the multiplication can be done by repeated addition, this page might come useful: https://www.nayuki.io/page/elliptic-curve-point-addition-in-projective-coordinates

 100 
 on: Today at 09:18:11 AM 
Started by Donneski - Last post by justdimin
The newest revelation that has led many to accept BTC is the fact that the government of any country can either chose to adopt it as a legal tender or use it in addition to their countries currency by merely regulating its activity. Now, that's a big plus for something that was seen as a chaos waiting to happen, hence why many governments created their CBDCs to prevent or discourage their citizens from patronizing cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin for real because of the lure of what digital currency stands to represent and project.
It's now very potent, in that all the sayings and thought of the first and popular cryptocurrency, Bitcoin failing, has been disproved.

A time will come when the world governments would have no choice than to adopt BTC and cryptocurrencies as a recognized means for payments after transactions because because of its consistency in proving regulators wrong and doing the needful where our regular commercial Banks fail or fall short.
That time has already come and we are seeing a lot of people making a lot of changes right now. Look at governments, most of them are making a mistake and we should consider how this is a very normal situation. I think the best thing about the current deal is that we need to make sure that we can hold it, as long as we can so that we can profit from it while governments end up with getting a better result.

Just consider the fact that we are going to be seeing a lot of the best things possible happening to bitcoin by governments not only accepting its existence, but putting good laws into it as well, saving people from scammers and also keeping it legit and a commodity as well. So all in all, I think we are on the right direction.

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10]
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!