Twitter and Bitcoin

[Silver80]

So I think it's really important for Twitter and Twitter shareholders that it continues to see the space and invest aggressively in it. It's not just Twitter that has a strategy for crypto money. Another social media giant, Facebook also has a digital currency. There is a clear need and reward therefore. And I think the original open standards of the internet is the way to go, which is why my focus and our focus is ultimately on Bitcoin.

Not only facebook, but also telegram, even though Facebook failed in its "libra" because of the lawsuit and replaced it with "silent", telegram with "TON" is a problem with the regulations rules, now Foobee is starting to plan with his "FBE" which was made a bounty by manager  irfan_pak10.

Either way, this type of method  sooner or later will be employed by others and so right now it is a matter of time.

it wouldn't be the same as what would happen if applying it was taken for granted.

[coupable]

So I think it's really important for Twitter and Twitter shareholders that it continues to see the space and invest aggressively in it. It's not just Twitter that has a strategy for crypto money. Another social media giant, Facebook also has a digital currency. There is a clear need and reward therefore. And I think the original open standards of the internet is the way to go, which is why my focus and our focus is ultimately on Bitcoin.

Not only facebook, but also telegram, even though Facebook failed in its "libra" because of the lawsuit and replaced it with "silent", telegram with "TON" is a problem with the regulations rules, now Foobee is starting to plan with his "FBE" which was made a bounty by manager  irfan_pak10.

All of them (except with telegram) claims to be using cryptocurrencies to produce more optimistic products for tipping and commerce which can reach people from all arround the world; this is surely true to reach every potiential custmer but the problem imo is that those companies still studing the procedure of how they will get profit from it with the maximum less taxation to be paid. Facebook even tried to create something similar to cryptocurrencies but with a very centralised authority (fortunetly it failed before to start) while twitter aims to use bitcoin in particular (despite all the technical obstacles) also to reach the max largest population as bitcoin is the most known cryptocurrencies.

[Shenzou]

I feel like over the past few years we have seen many companies big or small, trying to implement the use of cryptocurrency like bitcoin in some way or another, one would say how twitter could possibly be using crypto or bitcoin and here they surprise us with the tipping feature, and i feel like they will be creating some type of cryptocurrency specific to them just like Facebook did, and i am sure that a lot of other companies are planning to do this since this is a very profitable industry that has been growing at a fast rate.

[milewilda]

I feel like over the past few years we have seen many companies big or small, trying to implement the use of cryptocurrency like bitcoin in some way or another, one would say how twitter could possibly be using crypto or bitcoin and here they surprise us with the tipping feature, and i feel like they will be creating some type of cryptocurrency specific to them just like Facebook did, and i am sure that a lot of other companies are planning to do this since this is a very profitable industry that has been growing at a fast rate.

Doesnt really matter much whether its a big or small company who had accepted bitcoin or make out some integrations.What matter most here is the recognition of those companies which does signify
that adoption is really on the move.I wont be surprised if in future we would really be seeing these kind of integrations or recognition in other companies as well or known platforms.
All we do need is some catalyst that do really start up such step forward but well lets not make our hopes up because it doesnt mean that we would make out some guarantee that we
are heading there.

[Silver80]

So I think it's really important for Twitter and Twitter shareholders that it continues to see the space and invest aggressively in it. It's not just Twitter that has a strategy for crypto money. Another social media giant, Facebook also has a digital currency. There is a clear need and reward therefore. And I think the original open standards of the internet is the way to go, which is why my focus and our focus is ultimately on Bitcoin.

Not only facebook, but also telegram, even though Facebook failed in its "libra" because of the lawsuit and replaced it with "silent", telegram with "TON" is a problem with the regulations rules, now Foobee is starting to plan with his "FBE" which was made a bounty by manager  irfan_pak10.

All of them (except with telegram) claims to be using cryptocurrencies to produce more optimistic products for tipping and commerce which can reach people from all arround the world; this is surely true to reach every potiential custmer but the problem imo is that those companies still studing the procedure of how they will get profit from it with the maximum less taxation to be paid. Facebook even tried to create something similar to cryptocurrencies but with a very centralised authority (fortunetly it failed before to start) while twitter aims to use bitcoin in particular (despite all the technical obstacles) also to reach the max largest population as bitcoin is the most known cryptocurrencies.

why do you exclude with telegram isn't "TON" owned by Telegram?, so far I haven't heard line from japan, wechat and waido from china do the same, how do you analyze "everything"?  don't just think Facebook acquired whatapp and Instragram they have taken over all your social media you're wrong!!!

I feel like over the past few years we have seen many companies big or small, trying to implement the use of cryptocurrency like bitcoin in some way or another, one would say how twitter could possibly be using crypto or bitcoin and here they surprise us with the tipping feature, and i feel like they will be creating some type of cryptocurrency specific to them just like Facebook did, and i am sure that a lot of other companies are planning to do this since this is a very profitable industry that has been growing at a fast rate.

Doesnt really matter much whether its a big or small company who had accepted bitcoin or make out some integrations.What matter most here is the recognition of those companies which does signify
that adoption is really on the move.

The easiest way is to do it with the state legalizing it.

[coupable]

So I think it's really important for Twitter and Twitter shareholders that it continues to see the space and invest aggressively in it. It's not just Twitter that has a strategy for crypto money. Another social media giant, Facebook also has a digital currency. There is a clear need and reward therefore. And I think the original open standards of the internet is the way to go, which is why my focus and our focus is ultimately on Bitcoin.

Not only facebook, but also telegram, even though Facebook failed in its "libra" because of the lawsuit and replaced it with "silent", telegram with "TON" is a problem with the regulations rules, now Foobee is starting to plan with his "FBE" which was made a bounty by manager  irfan_pak10.

All of them (except with telegram) claims to be using cryptocurrencies to produce more optimistic products for tipping and commerce which can reach people from all arround the world; this is surely true to reach every potiential custmer but the problem imo is that those companies still studing the procedure of how they will get profit from it with the maximum less taxation to be paid. Facebook even tried to create something similar to cryptocurrencies but with a very centralised authority (fortunetly it failed before to start) while twitter aims to use bitcoin in particular (despite all the technical obstacles) also to reach the max largest population as bitcoin is the most known cryptocurrencies.

why do you exclude with telegram isn't "TON" owned by Telegram?, so far I haven't heard line from japan, wechat and waido from china do the same, how do you analyze "everything"?  don't just think Facebook acquired whatapp and Instragram they have taken over all your social media you're wrong!!!

Sorry man, I think i am somehow mistaken about few points.
I mis-read the symbol "TON" and thought it's "TRON". I was discussing how/why those projects preffered to use their own built cryptocurrencies and not using a one of the major altcoins in the market? I thought about this after reading op about Twitter to lunch more products using bitcoin as main system for paiements.
In fact, i can't compare wechat and waido with telegram and twitter because those companies are leaded by China which is a country who want to control everythings people use.

[Silver80]

So I think it's really important for Twitter and Twitter shareholders that it continues to see the space and invest aggressively in it. It's not just Twitter that has a strategy for crypto money. Another social media giant, Facebook also has a digital currency. There is a clear need and reward therefore. And I think the original open standards of the internet is the way to go, which is why my focus and our focus is ultimately on Bitcoin.

Not only facebook, but also telegram, even though Facebook failed in its "libra" because of the lawsuit and replaced it with "silent", telegram with "TON" is a problem with the regulations rules, now Foobee is starting to plan with his "FBE" which was made a bounty by manager  irfan_pak10.

All of them (except with telegram) claims to be using cryptocurrencies to produce more optimistic products for tipping and commerce which can reach people from all arround the world; this is surely true to reach every potiential custmer but the problem imo is that those companies still studing the procedure of how they will get profit from it with the maximum less taxation to be paid. Facebook even tried to create something similar to cryptocurrencies but with a very centralised authority (fortunetly it failed before to start) while twitter aims to use bitcoin in particular (despite all the technical obstacles) also to reach the max largest population as bitcoin is the most known cryptocurrencies.

why do you exclude with telegram isn't "TON" owned by Telegram?, so far I haven't heard line from japan, wechat and waido from china do the same, how do you analyze "everything"?  don't just think Facebook acquired whatapp and Instragram they have taken over all your social media you're wrong!!!

Sorry man, I think i am somehow mistaken about few points.
I mis-read the symbol "TON" and thought it's "TRON". I was discussing how/why those projects preffered to use their own built cryptocurrencies and not using a one of the major altcoins in the market? I thought about this after reading op about Twitter to lunch more products using bitcoin as main system for paiements.
In fact, i can't compare wechat and waido with telegram and twitter because those companies are leaded by China which is a country who want to control everythings people use.

what's unique is that Chinese manufacturers should turn on the TRC20 network such as TRON, BTT, and others, but so far they don't use it, we know China is a very smart country and tends to use its own products even though they often have problems, interesting things are waiting for them there to invade cryptocurrencies.