The "Will kill" society!

[myrkul]

Tell me, what do you think the effects on crime would be if every single person in New York over the age of, say, 18, were given (and, of course, trained in the use of) a pistol, 20 rounds of ammunition, and concealed carry permit?

I don't believe it will reduce crime...

Thank you for answering. I suppose we can continue.

You don't think that the next time someone tries to rape a woman, or rob a convenience store, that the newly-armed populace will defend themselves?

[vampire]

You don't think that the next time someone tries to rape a woman, or rob a convenience store, that the newly-armed populace will defend themselves?

There will be an increase crime in one area and decrease the crime in the other ones. We already went through the statistics, guns reducing crime is a myth. Educating people does reduce crime.

Just quote old posts if you want to argue the statistics.

So now answer my question or you LOST your argument. Game over.

[myrkul]

You don't think that the next time someone tries to rape a woman, or rob a convenience store, that the newly-armed populace will defend themselves?

There will be an increase crime in one area and decrease the crime in the other ones. We already went through the statistics, guns reducing crime is a myth. Educating people does reduce crime.

But is the increase in one area the same as the decrease in others?



And I didn't see any questions you asked worth answering. Unless you were referring to this:

Do you agree that "will kill" is an idiotic idea.

It's not phrased as a question, but it's the closest thing to a question you've posted lately.

I do not agree that it is an idiotic idea. It is hyperbole, to prove a point. Hyperbole is often absurd. That's the point.

[vampire]

You don't think that the next time someone tries to rape a woman, or rob a convenience store, that the newly-armed populace will defend themselves?

There will be an increase crime in one area and decrease the crime in the other ones. We already went through the statistics, guns reducing crime is a myth. Educating people does reduce crime.

But is the increase in one area the same as the decrease in others?

May be? Possible? Statistics says so. Since you contradict yourself with every new post, it's pretty silly to answer these questions.

And I didn't see any questions you asked worth answering. Unless you were referring to this:

Do you agree that "will kill" is an idiotic idea.

It's not phrased as a question, but it's the closest thing to a question you've posted lately.

I do not agree that it is an idiotic idea. It is hyperbole, to prove a point. Hyperbole is often absurd. That's the point.

I am done talking. There is absurd and there is idiotism.

[myrkul]

You don't think that the next time someone tries to rape a woman, or rob a convenience store, that the newly-armed populace will defend themselves?

There will be an increase crime in one area and decrease the crime in the other ones. We already went through the statistics, guns reducing crime is a myth. Educating people does reduce crime.

But is the increase in one area the same as the decrease in others?

May be? Possible? Statistics says so. Since you contradict yourself with every new post, it's pretty silly to answer these questions.

Which statistics would those be? John Lott did a great deal of research for his book, and came up with the opposite conclusion, that the substitution was much less.

And I didn't see any questions you asked worth answering. Unless you were referring to this:

Do you agree that "will kill" is an idiotic idea.

It's not phrased as a question, but it's the closest thing to a question you've posted lately.

I do not agree that it is an idiotic idea. It is hyperbole, to prove a point. Hyperbole is often absurd. That's the point.

I am done talking. There is absurd and there is idiotism.

Oh, let's be honest. You were never "talking," this has all been logorrhea.