Block size increase status!

[BlindMayorBitcorn]

If you scroll through the forum, especially this main Bitcoin discussion thread, you can see there is much less talk about the all XT fork situation and block size increase.

If I had to guess, the loudest proponents from each side (XT/BIP101 vs. everyone else) have put their opponents on "ignore", hence the lack of vitriolic discussion over the past several days. Have we achieved any sort of consensus? Invariably, no.

But the way that bitcoin works -- if there is no consensus on a new protocol change, the status quo prevails. ^^

.

This is the way I see it; the problem isn't even so much the scaling up, it's the governance model in place to do it. It seems sort of broken. I attribute it to human error 

[Blawpaw]

I personally believe the code should be untouched. The solution lies on Colored coins, Sidechains or even with the Bitcoin Lightning Network proposal.

[Ilove-Obama]

If you scroll through the forum, especially this main Bitcoin discussion thread, you can see there is much less talk about the all XT fork situation and block size increase.

So where are we exactly on this? Have we moved anywhere closer to the solution?
Or are the people just tired of talking about this problem so they refuse to do it anymore?

Or are we so confident that the consensus will be reached and problem will be solved during the next 2 workshops of which the first is in Montreal so we already consider it a done deal?

    
I'm against XT. it is better to increase to 1 MB current network