meono
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 20, 2015, 03:00:17 PM |
|
@meono, you can comment it from your original forum account
Can you PM the admin and tell them that? Anyway, do you want to argue while others clearly explained it to you? Its you that refuse to understand it.
|
|
|
|
meono
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 20, 2015, 03:01:05 PM |
|
@meono, you can comment it from your original forum account I don't find, where it is called. Can you show me?
There isn't ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) It is simply not true, this place if full of trolls and ignorants that simply doesn't know and doesn't want to understand anything about the topic. It's a feature against dos attack, and if you don't like it? Bam! Just add -disableipprio before running the node/client. OMG!!! Move on. The most of the users are not aware about -disableipprio switch and this is not excuse. XT client has Anti-DDOS tor blocking feature enabled by default which means that user's privacy can be compromised.No it does not, Show me the code that does what you say. So we can explain it to you.
|
|
|
|
|
everaja
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 20, 2015, 03:14:49 PM |
|
The Twitter Post By bitpay clearly reveals that it is supporting Larger Block size and they should , i also support Larger Block size as i want Network to Process much Transaction than it is doing Right away. I think OP got it another way that Bitpay is supporting Bitcoin XT.
|
|
|
|
cogabonito
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 20, 2015, 03:17:12 PM |
|
What a legendary shill. They don't support XT, they support bigger block sizes. That's already supported by almost everybody in the community.
|
|
|
|
Lauda
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 20, 2015, 03:17:47 PM |
|
Let me clarify this one more time. Supporting bigger blocks =/= supporting XT Supporting BIP101 =/= supporting XT.
Unless someone explicitly states that:"I support BIP101 and XT/within XT.", you're talking things out of context.
|
"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks" 😼 Bitcoin Core ( onion)
|
|
|
HostFat
Staff
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4256
Merit: 1208
I support freedom of choice
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 20, 2015, 03:24:29 PM |
|
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/chainparams.cpp vSeeds.push_back(CDNSSeedData("bitcoin.sipa.be", "seed.bitcoin.sipa.be")); // Pieter Wuille vSeeds.push_back(CDNSSeedData("bluematt.me", "dnsseed.bluematt.me")); // Matt Corallo vSeeds.push_back(CDNSSeedData("dashjr.org", "dnsseed.bitcoin.dashjr.org")); // Luke Dashjr vSeeds.push_back(CDNSSeedData("bitcoinstats.com", "seed.bitcoinstats.com")); // Christian Decker vSeeds.push_back(CDNSSeedData("xf2.org", "bitseed.xf2.org")); // Jeff Garzik vSeeds.push_back(CDNSSeedData("bitcoin.jonasschnelli.ch", "seed.bitcoin.jonasschnelli.ch")); // Jonas Schnelli OMG, even Bitcoin Core is leaking our IP! ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) And no, it is NOT true, if the node is set to use a proxy, it doesn't download the list. Everything that you are writing is not true. Move on.
|
|
|
|
LiteCoinGuy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1014
In Satoshi I Trust
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 20, 2015, 03:26:57 PM |
|
![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fs2.postimg.org%2Fagdjmvqhl%2Fzbitpaybitcoinxt_Untitled.png&t=665&c=UrQGLLpbKJqJrg) It is inevitable. All major players will support XT because it scales their operations. I'm pretty sure Mike and Gavin have been approached by them to release the code in the wild so they can use it. The free market will prevail. that could be true yes. the major players bet on bitcoin ...on a "big" bitcoin with hundreds of millions of users. bitcoin core will not adopt bigger blocks - so it will be XT in the end
|
|
|
|
meono
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 20, 2015, 03:29:42 PM |
|
Jesus christ the amount of idiots in here are heartbreaking.
Support BIP101 means the BitcoinXT is completely compatible with whatever chain it is after the fork
Hence the BitcoinXT will remain as alternative client just as it is now.
This is EXACTLY the point Gavin wants to make by letting it out in the wild and LET THE NETWORK COMES TO CONSENSUS..
Now go laugh at your core devs because the Network WON.
|
|
|
|
pedrog
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2786
Merit: 1031
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 20, 2015, 03:37:33 PM |
|
Mike already commented on that: You seem to think I hate Tor. I am actually the maintainer of a full blown Tor implementation (Orchid). I've done a lot of work on integrating it into bitcoinj and I'm basically the only guy who can actually move the needle on Tor/Bitcoin usage, by enabling the use of it by default in consumer wallets that have hundreds of thousands of installs. We're not there yet (it's still too slow) but we're a lot closer than before.
This doesn't change the fact that Tor is heavily abused. It can be useful but it's a frequent source of attacks of all kinds. So finding ways to get the good without the bad involves some tricky coding.
Below, you say "anyone can jam the network with just two IP addresses". Yes, that's unfortunate isn't it. I've been sounding the alarm about Bitcoin Core's poor DoS protection for years. Nobody listened, that's why I have now written a new anti-DoS system that can handle this sort of thing. It starts by clustering and deprioritising Tor because we've seen actual jamming attacks that came through Tor, and because using it is a lot safer and more convenient for an attacker than using your own IP addresses or using a botnet. But it absolutely should be extended to have more advanced heuristics. Instead of whinging that (gasp) loading a file from a web server is "insane", maybe you should be writing code instead. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10048768So, where's your code?
|
|
|
|
Carlton Banks
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3430
Merit: 3080
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 20, 2015, 03:37:38 PM |
|
I don't find, where it is called. Can you show me?
There isn't ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) It's a feature against dos attack, and if you don't like it? Bam! Just add -disableipprio before running the node/client. OMG!!! That works in a way that stops your own node from discriminating against Tor traffic, it doesn't prevent anyone using the feature from discriminating against you as a user. They can.
|
Vires in numeris
|
|
|
HostFat
Staff
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4256
Merit: 1208
I support freedom of choice
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 20, 2015, 03:46:01 PM |
|
That works in a way that stops your own node from discriminating against Tor traffic, it doesn't prevent anyone using the feature from discriminating against you ....
IF the node is under a dos attack. Move on.
|
|
|
|
turvarya
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 20, 2015, 03:48:33 PM |
|
A lot of people already did. Some of us are trying to narrow it down to the actual code. I don't want to discuss hearsay.
|
|
|
|
Quickseller
Copper Member
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2968
Merit: 2370
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 20, 2015, 11:05:55 PM |
|
Please stop misinforming community. What are you doing is blatant manipulation in order to promote Bitcoin XT.
BitPay supports BIP101 (large blocks), but not XT!
The tweet mentioned in the OP links to a blog postA few snippets: --snip--
In our opinion, BIP 101 should be pulled into Bitcoin Core.
Currently, the block size limit is hard-coded to 1mb, which constrains overall transaction throughput. BIP101 proposes to increase that limit to 8mb after January of 2016 when a supermajority (>75%) of the blocks being mined indicate they support the increase. The limit on block size will double every two years after that until it reaches 8gb in 2036.
--snip--
In summary, we believe BIP 101 will safeguard Bitcoin’s decentralized nature while providing a reliable, immediate path toward greater network throughput, and we would like to express our support for merging BIP 101 into Bitcoin Core. From the looks of it they are supporting the hard fork that will happen once 75% of the miners (based on blocks found) accept BIP 101. I don't think it is entirely accurate to say that BitPay is not supporting XT. I think it would be more accurate to say that BitPay is supporting Bitcoin Core to have the same rules that XT will have regarding larger blocks.
|
|
|
|
meono
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 20, 2015, 11:14:38 PM |
|
Please stop misinforming community. What are you doing is blatant manipulation in order to promote Bitcoin XT.
BitPay supports BIP101 (large blocks), but not XT!
The tweet mentioned in the OP links to a blog postA few snippets: --snip--
In our opinion, BIP 101 should be pulled into Bitcoin Core.
Currently, the block size limit is hard-coded to 1mb, which constrains overall transaction throughput. BIP101 proposes to increase that limit to 8mb after January of 2016 when a supermajority (>75%) of the blocks being mined indicate they support the increase. The limit on block size will double every two years after that until it reaches 8gb in 2036.
--snip--
In summary, we believe BIP 101 will safeguard Bitcoin’s decentralized nature while providing a reliable, immediate path toward greater network throughput, and we would like to express our support for merging BIP 101 into Bitcoin Core. From the looks of it they are supporting the hard fork that will happen once 75% of the miners (based on blocks found) accept BIP 101. I don't think it is entirely accurate to say that BitPay is not supporting XT. I think it would be more accurate to say that BitPay is supporting Bitcoin Core to have the same rules that XT will have regarding larger blocks. Let me clarify BIP101 blocks will have the same version as BitcoinXT blocks hence BitcoinXT will count them to the 750 blocks target, so it does not matter if bitpay use XT nodes or not
|
|
|
|
Carlton Banks
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3430
Merit: 3080
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 20, 2015, 11:50:37 PM |
|
That works in a way that stops your own node from discriminating against Tor traffic, it doesn't prevent anyone using the feature from discriminating against you ....
IF the node is under a dos attack. Move on. Lol that doesn't even make sense loosely. I think you knew that though.
|
Vires in numeris
|
|
|
SebastianJu
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2674
Merit: 1083
Legendary Escrow Service - Tip Jar in Profile
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 21, 2015, 08:17:13 PM |
|
This is not the version available for download from official XT site. Official XT version has a backdoor that allows NSA/CIA and other parties to start ddos attack that blocks Tor and de-anonymizes users. Did you buy this account? ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) You surely should not believe every world conspiracy gossip. If there would be a backdoor then it would be known already. Though i agree. Hearn is stupid to add such things. If he thinks he will win more users then he is really stupid.
|
Please ALWAYS contact me through bitcointalk pm before sending someone coins.
|
|
|
|