Bitcoin Forum
November 13, 2024, 02:05:55 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Are signature campaigns actually profitable for the people who host them?  (Read 991 times)
BTCLovingDude
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1134
Merit: 1010

BTC to the moon is inevitable...


View Profile WWW
February 21, 2016, 12:46:26 PM
 #21

they must be profitable for their owners, otherwise they would have stopped a very long time ago. Overview of Bitcointalk Signature-Ad Campaigns was created in 2014 and they must have been active before that so more than two years of profitability

--looking for signature--
plost24
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 21, 2016, 02:51:40 PM
 #22

signature campaigns is all about marketing so you any comapany need promotion so it is very profitable Wink for all of them

For rent 1.4 Bitcoin for 11 months starting Feb 1 2017
Bitinity
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3220
Merit: 1316


View Profile
February 21, 2016, 05:38:49 PM
 #23

This question has crossed my mind several times. signature campaigns must have paid out hundreds of BTC's by now,but how much profit did they generate to the hosters? what do you guys think?

There is no guarantee that signature campaigns will give profits, but it is how marketing and promotion works. Site's owner needs to promote their site as effective as they can in order to get visitors. There were some signature campaigns last year, just alive for less than a month. It means that their signature campaign was not profitable for them. But there are also some signature campaigns that running for long time, it means that that the signature campaign is still profitable (at least still give positive effects to the site)
mkc
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 517
Merit: 501


View Profile
February 21, 2016, 06:00:44 PM
 #24

Not only they are profitable, they are getting a better deal than Google, Facebook ad.
What they get here is intended,concentrated audience with high conversion rate.
Also they claim they are supporter of Bitcoin community, which is quite true as well.
It is a win win situation. The only regret I have us I should join one earlier.
DodoB (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 500


View Profile
February 21, 2016, 11:15:52 PM
 #25

In my opinion, if signature campaigns weren't profitable for the company, they will close them.

Yeah that makes sense. but i wonder how much they profit in terms of %? for example if they pay 1 BTC and get 2 BTC revenue from clicks,if ad campaigns are that profitable maybe every gambling site should host them
traderbit
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 798
Merit: 1000



View Profile WWW
February 21, 2016, 11:21:39 PM
 #26

We have seen mostly betting and gambling signature campaigns are most fast profitable at the moment (from zero to profit), but also campaigns like bitx and themerkle which I'm currently i think will bring lots of visitors and the popularity of the website and ranking will increase too, so there is a profit.

Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!