Who is a "core dev" ?

[LiteCoinGuy]

Who is a "core dev" ?





You can find alot more cool graphs on 
https://forum.bitcoin.com/post683.html#p683

[btcjoin14]

Well this is a nice chart. Definitely informative to the newer members of bitcoin.

[LCSociety]

interesting data here. Have been looking for a list like this to make a distinction between members of the foundation and actual core devs

+ 1

[alani123]

That's an interesting chart, but what do you make out of it, LiteCoinGuy?

[Amph]

pieter wuille is the true satoshi in my book look at the astonishing contribute that he has gave to bitcoin

[~Bitcoin~]

very informative chart thanks litecoinguy i have never find full developer list of bitcoin untill now. Thanks will use this info to write some articles about bitcoin.

[LiteCoinGuy]

That's an interesting chart, but what do you make out of it, LiteCoinGuy?

just some data and insight. 

[Lauda]

Is this a bad attempt at advertising the dying forum that you moderate? Post the charts here or go back to that cave.

That's an interesting chart, but what do you make out of it, LiteCoinGuy?

Example conclusion 1: The decision to remove commit access from Gavin is justified as he doesn't contribute anymore.
Example conclusion 2: On the seventh day, God rested but Pieter Wuille submitted a pull request. [1]
[1] - Source.
Update: I don't hate on anything; advertising that horrible forum is not in my list of favorable actions.

[LiteCoinGuy]

Is this a bad attempt at advertising the dying forum that you moderate? Post the charts here or go back to that cave.

That's an interesting chart, but what do you make out of it, LiteCoinGuy?

Example conclusion 1: The decision to remove commit access from Gavin is justified as he doesn't contribute anymore.
Example conclusion 2: On the seventh day, God rested but Pieter Wuille submitted a pull request. [1]
[1] - Source.

4 people already said "thanks for the valuable informations" so why so much hate? the info is free for everyone.

[AGD]

Is this a bad attempt at advertising the dying forum that you moderate? Post the charts here or go back to that cave.

That's an interesting chart, but what do you make out of it, LiteCoinGuy?

Example conclusion 1: The decision to remove commit access from Gavin is justified as he doesn't contribute anymore.
Example conclusion 2: On the seventh day, God rested but Pieter Wuille submitted a pull request. [1]
[1] - Source.

4 people already said "thanks for the valuable informations" so why so much hate? the info is free for everyone.

and it's a good one. Thx LCG

[hdbuck]

Is this a bad attempt at advertising the dying forum that you moderate? Post the charts here or go back to that cave.

That's an interesting chart, but what do you make out of it, LiteCoinGuy?

Example conclusion 1: The decision to remove commit access from Gavin is justified as he doesn't contribute anymore.
Example conclusion 2: On the seventh day, God rested but Pieter Wuille submitted a pull request. [1]
[1] - Source.

4 people already said "thanks for the valuable informations" so why so much hate? the info is free for everyone.

cuz this is quite an old chart and you're a prick.

[LiteCoinGuy]

Is this a bad attempt at advertising the dying forum that you moderate? Post the charts here or go back to that cave.

That's an interesting chart, but what do you make out of it, LiteCoinGuy?

Example conclusion 1: The decision to remove commit access from Gavin is justified as he doesn't contribute anymore.
Example conclusion 2: On the seventh day, God rested but Pieter Wuille submitted a pull request. [1]
[1] - Source.

4 people already said "thanks for the valuable informations" so why so much hate? the info is free for everyone.

cuz this is quite an old chart and you're a prick.

2-3 month old maybe. and why am i a "prick" in your view?

[Kprawn]

Still people think Gavin should be in charge, but it's clear that the top 3 people have contributed the most to the Bitcoin code... Well apart from the creator "Satoshi" The most significant piece of

information, is in the last entry to this graph. Mike Hearn contributed nearly nothing and the press made him out to be the CEO of Bitcoin. A little bit of research would have brought these facts to

the table, but they simply ignored that part. Thanks LCG ... I saw this graph before and it highlights some key points in regards to who should be in charge. 

[thejaytiesto]

I remember this chart, I think it was Nick Szabo that originally posted in in his twitter. It's clear that Gavin hasn't done anything for years now, so I don't see how we had some fanboys crying about how he got removed, I think it's fair because we can not be having those sort of privileges granted to people that don't do anything for years, that is an exploitable weakness.

[LiteCoinGuy]

I remember this chart, I think it was Nick Szabo that originally posted in in his twitter. It's clear that Gavin hasn't done anything for years now, so I don't see how we had some fanboys crying about how he got removed, I think it's fair because we can not be having those sort of privileges granted to people that don't do anything for years, that is an exploitable weakness.

I agree.

I would just clarify a few things -

1-- There are 368 Core developers thus far but 50-60 active ones
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin

2- Lines of code doesn't necessarily dictate the value a developer brings to the table as there are many things that developers contribute towards- research, testing, troubleshooting, documentation that isn't gauged in the infographic above. This being said Pieter Wuille and Greg Maxwell have clearly contributed the most in all categories these last couple years.

3-- One should acknowledge the many different competing but rarely used implementations libbitcoin, Bitcoin Unlimited, XT, Bitcoin Classic, Bitcore, and more that make user choice with a diversity of implementations available. Core currently has most of the talent thus it would be great if other implementations found methods of encouraging and paying for other repos.

4-- Core isn't a unified project , but a diverse group of developers with many different backgrounds, opinions, and funding sources. No one group controls Core and anyone can choose to contribute and support this open source project.

[2c0de]

Nice chart, but my personally favourite dev, btcdrak,is missing.

[hdbuck]

Is this a bad attempt at advertising the dying forum that you moderate? Post the charts here or go back to that cave.

That's an interesting chart, but what do you make out of it, LiteCoinGuy?

Example conclusion 1: The decision to remove commit access from Gavin is justified as he doesn't contribute anymore.
Example conclusion 2: On the seventh day, God rested but Pieter Wuille submitted a pull request. [1]
[1] - Source.

4 people already said "thanks for the valuable informations" so why so much hate? the info is free for everyone.

cuz this is quite an old chart and you're a prick.

2-3 month old maybe. and why am i a "prick" in your view?

1/ you're a big block nao forker that does not understand the integrity and decentralization of the network
2/ you're a shit talker that has been stirring shit on most social media spreading misinformation and fud
3/ you're a bitcoin foundation prick that only served his own shitful ego
4/ you're a corporation shill that only see bitcoin as a visa/paypal competitor
5/ you're basically a moron that nobody cares about but the few XT/classic/USGavin/Hearnia morons

I could go on and on but you are certainly not worth my nor any honest bitcoiner's time.

Wake up pal, you are finished in bitcoin's community so do us a favor and fuck off already..