Bitcoin Forum
May 26, 2024, 06:06:32 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 [3]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Trump or Clinton: Does it matter?  (Read 1852 times)
XbladeX
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1302
Merit: 1002



View Profile
September 06, 2016, 10:11:14 PM
 #41

Clinton = WW3
Trump = US bankrupt and no WW3

Clinton would kill all people on the world you saw her talking BS on Kadafi with smile.
Trump can is buisness man so i don't know if all his BS is just true or BS and when he comes to be president all is BS
and nothing really happened becouse people in charge are BANKS at end.

Request / 26th September / 2022 APP-06-22-4587
tvbcof
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4592
Merit: 1276


View Profile
September 06, 2016, 11:09:16 PM
 #42

Clinton = WW3
Trump = US bankrupt and no WW3

Clinton would kill all people on the world you saw her talking BS on Kadafi with smile.
Trump can is buisness man so i don't know if all his BS is just true or BS and when he comes to be president all is BS
and nothing really happened becouse people in charge are BANKS at end.

One of the biggest thing I'm looking forward to in a Trump presidency is to 'go bankrupt.'  I very much liked it when the guy say 'I the king of debt.  I love debt.  I love to play with it.'

My opinion is that if entity A defaults on a debt to entity B, it is more entity B's fault than the other way around.  This is the reason I have very little sympathy for those who lost money/Bitcoin in the myriad of instances when an exchange folded up and appropriated their funds.  (BTW, Mt. Gox still owes me a $5k wire and I consider it 100% 'my fault' since I made the calculations about how much to allow them to owe me.)

Back to the U.S., nobody for the last 20 years should have expected to get their money back when they bought our debt, and certainly noone as sophisticated as, say, China.  They were strong-armed into buying our debt for other benefits (e.g., monetary flows to build their industry, oil flows to keep it running, etc.)

I would say that we'll have a 'bankruptcy' (as well as more war) under Clinton or her replacement as well but in that case our resources will be offered by the well connected to the creditors.  This will include our infrastructure, our in-the-ground mineral reserves, and even the private property of innocent U.S. citizens.  This is more-or-less what happened as the Soviet Union fell apart.  Many of the resource grabs (e.g., the EPA's WOTUS rule) look a lot to me like a setup for just this eventuality.


sig spam anywhere and self-moderated threads on the pol&soc board are for losers.
awesome31312 (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 826
Merit: 504


View Profile
September 06, 2016, 11:12:59 PM
 #43

He is the king of debt only when he has the US Government to bail him out and take his side, and he owes his success to exploiting legal loopholes which he won't be able to benefit from when trying to apply the same techniques to resolving America's debts with China and Russia

Account recovered 08-12-2019
Spendulus
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2898
Merit: 1386



View Profile
September 07, 2016, 07:47:42 PM
 #44

Clinton = WW3
Trump = US bankrupt and no WW3

....

Of those options I definitely like the second one.
Sundark
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 502


View Profile
September 07, 2016, 07:56:55 PM
 #45

Clinton = WW3
Trump = US bankrupt and no WW3

....

Of those options I definitely like the second one.
Then why exactly general media presents Trump as WW3 propagator? I got the impression that he is presented as bad guy and potential catalyst of new conflicts.
While Hillary is calm and rational person who will rather negotiate and try to find a peaceful solution - is not that right?
Masha Sha
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 252


View Profile
September 07, 2016, 08:32:15 PM
 #46

Hillary Clinton. I see something better,  something can make US better.
As a woman,  she can be a motivator for the girls around the world that a woman can be someone.
Woman can be a leader, woman can lead a big country.




Okay? So go back plotting your sdr take over, it ain't gonna happen... But maybe you are so uninformed that you don't know who is the woman on the picture? It wouldn't surprise me from someone who wrote what you did.

/sarc /snowflakeshield /iammorevirtuousthanyou /2692 /pixelsonscreeen /fuckthemusep2p /p2p=love
Pages: « 1 2 [3]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!