1. The M&G Shares cant vote and nobody can vote with them.
I agree not voting would make things easier and it seems to be what people want. but, why?
Why should these shares abstain and the fund not have an input, especially considering the next suggestion of creating a board. Shouldn't this board use the voting power to help steer the company?
I am not personally against just considering the shares inert, but I want to make sure the decision is well reasoned. Are there any regular wall st examples of how this should be done?
2. a Supervisory Board elected from the shareholder check and allow expenses and investments!
greets chuck
Assuming we decide to go down this route, how do you guys think we could effectively create a board with the tools available to us in bitcoin land here?
