Bitcoin Forum
June 07, 2024, 12:24:15 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: 21m coin limit promotes wild price swings  (Read 721 times)
slothbag (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 369
Merit: 250



View Profile
April 11, 2013, 02:05:59 PM
 #1

I think if Satoshi had created bitcoin with 1billion or 1trillion base units instead of 21million then we would see less wild price swings.

Think about it, if the early adopters bought at 0.000001, and the first bubble was 0.000031, and the recent ramp up was 0.000266 then it doesn't sound like that big a deal.

The price per bitcoin in usd even though arbitrary is a psychological factor.

I guess the difference is the current method is great at promoting value and growth compared with other currencies metals and stocks etc, but also bubbles.  Whereas a much lower rate would maybe not attract enough attention quickly enough to catch on.

Thoughts?
john_doe
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 137
Merit: 100


View Profile
April 11, 2013, 03:12:50 PM
 #2

If you bought Bitcoins at $0.01 and now they are worth $0.001 it's (practically and psychologically) the same as if you had bought them at $100 and then they were worth $10.

You never traded penny stocks?  Roll Eyes

If you believe my post is helpful and you feel like donating a small amount, please use this address: 165i2m6WNT3v4KPWbFesKhceaXf2shcUDR
slothbag (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 369
Merit: 250



View Profile
April 12, 2013, 12:57:53 AM
 #3

But nobody quotes in satoshi's. everyone quotes in bitcoin (the whole unit) of which there is only 21m.  If everyone was quoting in satoshi's then 1usd = 0.00000266 doesn't sound very over priced does it.

I'm just saying the high valuation caused from quoting in bitcoin whole units makes it SOUND over valued.
crazyfingers
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 28
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 12, 2013, 01:06:00 AM
 #4

But nobody quotes in satoshi's. everyone quotes in bitcoin (the whole unit) of which there is only 21m.  If everyone was quoting in satoshi's then 1usd = 0.00000266 doesn't sound very over priced does it.

I'm just saying the high valuation caused from quoting in bitcoin whole units makes it SOUND over valued.

Agreed, there is certainly a psychological factor to it, which is why as someone who only got into this recently I purchased litecoins more heavily.

Yes, BTC is divisible to the 8th digit or whatever, but IMO most non mathematically-inclined people are not instinctively comfortable with dealing in fractions. I wouldn't be surprised if a significant minority (or greater) doesn't understand the different between .1 and .01.

edit: Then again, as time passes and payment systems such as BTC debit cards and smart phone apps are developed and popularized, this problem with perception might work itself out.
Luckybit
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714
Merit: 510



View Profile
April 12, 2013, 01:25:11 AM
 #5

I think perhaps BTC is not deflationary enough. 21 million probably should be 11 million.
romerun
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1078
Merit: 1001


Bitcoin is new, makes sense to hodl.


View Profile
April 12, 2013, 01:49:05 AM
 #6

gox should add LTC to dilute the market and swinginess
Elwar
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3598
Merit: 2386


Viva Ut Vivas


View Profile WWW
April 12, 2013, 01:50:24 AM
 #7

But nobody quotes in satoshi's. everyone quotes in bitcoin (the whole unit) of which there is only 21m.  If everyone was quoting in satoshi's then 1usd = 0.00000266 doesn't sound very over priced does it.

I'm just saying the high valuation caused from quoting in bitcoin whole units makes it SOUND over valued.

Going from .000000266 to .000000050 would not be that big of a deal.

First seastead company actually selling sea homes: Ocean Builders https://ocean.builders  Of course we accept bitcoin.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!