Bitcoin Forum
June 28, 2024, 09:58:09 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Claymore 9.6 AMD XMR Miner - Help with Hashrate Readings  (Read 1375 times)
minerman121 (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 45
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 01, 2017, 11:42:50 AM
 #1

Hi all

I didn't know how to work the question properly, so I found no answers.

A very quick one though;

I am using the Claymore Miner in a pool of choice. I know the M option gives hashrates of individual cards. However if anyone has mined XMR you would notice every so often when a new job is received, you get a hash rate reading. that reading when the new job is received is at least 120-150 Hash LOWER than the combined M option individual card Hash readings, averaged out over, say 5 iterations.

Any suggestions as to which is correct?

The main reason I want to find the info out is because I am tweaking power consumption to the ideal hash. Optimal profits and all that jazz Smiley
m1n1ngP4d4w4n
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 100

CryptoLearner


View Profile
January 01, 2017, 03:00:29 PM
 #2

Why not post your query in claymore topic dedicated to this miner  Huh Huh Huh Huh Huh

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=638915.0
minerman121 (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 45
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 01, 2017, 04:06:41 PM
 #3

That is good advice... Lol TY!
ethereumhunter
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 2940
Merit: 542


Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform


View Profile
January 01, 2017, 05:00:31 PM
 #4

Hi all

I didn't know how to work the question properly, so I found no answers.

A very quick one though;

I am using the Claymore Miner in a pool of choice. I know the M option gives hashrates of individual cards. However if anyone has mined XMR you would notice every so often when a new job is received, you get a hash rate reading. that reading when the new job is received is at least 120-150 Hash LOWER than the combined M option individual card Hash readings, averaged out over, say 5 iterations.

Any suggestions as to which is correct?

The main reason I want to find the info out is because I am tweaking power consumption to the ideal hash. Optimal profits and all that jazz Smiley

do you read the manual before you use the software and how to set up the software so its work properly with your hardware? if you read, then if something is not work then i think you need to read more about the manual because the result from each miners could be different although they using the same hardware, same software and same pool.

..Stake.com..   ▄████████████████████████████████████▄
   ██ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄            ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██  ▄████▄
   ██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██████████ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██  ██████
   ██ ██████████ ██      ██ ██████████ ██   ▀██▀
   ██ ██      ██ ██████  ██ ██      ██ ██    ██
   ██ ██████  ██ █████  ███ ██████  ██ ████▄ ██
   ██ █████  ███ ████  ████ █████  ███ ████████
   ██ ████  ████ ██████████ ████  ████ ████▀
   ██ ██████████ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██████████ ██
   ██            ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀            ██ 
   ▀█████████▀ ▄████████████▄ ▀█████████▀
  ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███  ██  ██  ███▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
 ██████████████████████████████████████████
▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄
█  ▄▀▄             █▀▀█▀▄▄
█  █▀█             █  ▐  ▐▌
█       ▄██▄       █  ▌  █
█     ▄██████▄     █  ▌ ▐▌
█    ██████████    █ ▐  █
█   ▐██████████▌   █ ▐ ▐▌
█    ▀▀██████▀▀    █ ▌ █
█     ▄▄▄██▄▄▄     █ ▌▐▌
█                  █▐ █
█                  █▐▐▌
█                  █▐█
▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀█
▄▄█████████▄▄
▄██▀▀▀▀█████▀▀▀▀██▄
▄█▀       ▐█▌       ▀█▄
██         ▐█▌         ██
████▄     ▄█████▄     ▄████
████████▄███████████▄████████
███▀    █████████████    ▀███
██       ███████████       ██
▀█▄       █████████       ▄█▀
▀█▄    ▄██▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██▄  ▄▄▄█▀
▀███████         ███████▀
▀█████▄       ▄█████▀
▀▀▀███▄▄▄███▀▀▀
..PLAY NOW..
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!